2060 BAD!!

>2060 BAD!!
>It's comparable to 1070!!!

Hello my fellow NPCs

Attached: relative-performance_1920-1080.png (500x1050, 54K)

hello, faggot

Also 2060 consumes less power than a 580.


The irony of how amdrones shit on nvidiots for being brainwashed by a company

2060 launched with the same price as the 1070 when it launched.

Vega is literally dead. There's 0 reason to get it

Sure but if I'm going to buy a GPU I'm going to see current price and choose, not pick an imaginary price.

Why don't you give shit to AMD for having watt black holes vegas that cost more and perform less than a 2060?

I was never pro-nvidia, but I never understood the amd fandom.
Like, it's a fucking company and they make shit.
I just get the best items for their price.

Idle should take no more than 1w, 10w should be illegal

Attached: 1524222251349.png (500x1010, 50K)

10% better is not worth upgrading from my 1070 for the exact same price.

>not worth upgrading
Why is this even a sentence?
Who asked you to upgrade?
Why would someone think a 70 model should be upgraded to a 60 of the next series?

kys

>reference to reference
lmao any aftermarket 1070 BTFOs it

+1
off yourself nigger shill

what a stupid person

1070 MSRP was $30 higher, and you couldn't find the card at MSRP during release. I think the lowest you could get it was like $420 for quite a while. 2060 on the other hand isn't very difficult to find at MSRP.

sure thing, I bet "aftermarket 1070s" btfo 1080's

lmao aftermarket 1070 might go from 83% to 85% at best, not even close to a reference 2060

AMDrones got btfo'd, literally this time.

What biased testing situation puts the 2070 13% above the 1080? Almost every reviewer shows them roughly equal except for TPU.

2060 is definitely the best value of the RTX cards if you can actually get it for $350 or less, but TPU is super sketchy and an outlier on their RTX card tests.

Almost all benchmarks show 2060 being on 1080 level

GamerNexus OC'd 2060 and said it's closer to a 2070 than to a 1070ti

No dipshit, everyone says it's comparable to a 1070Ti, which is corroborated by your image.
You blew yourself out.

>corroborated by your image
I literally got that exact 2060 EVGA card and it's slightly over 1080.

stop wasting oxygen

>closer to a 2070
So yeah a 1080 when OC'd. lmao?

>you blew yourself out
lmao, check the pic again, you blew yourself, le irony face.

Pls don't say that to me, tell that to Steve from Gamer Nexus you love so much.

>1070Ti: 94%
>2060: 97%
From OP image.
>b-but if I compare aftermarket OC to stock then!
Nope.

HAI GUISE

Attached: gt1030-02G-P4-6332-KR.png (887x545, 161K)

man, if they had 8GB on the 2060... FIGURATIVELY no one would buy a 2070.

How are you this retarded?
Gamers Nexus also put stock 2060 as similar to the 1070Ti, and 2070 similar to the 1080. Lines up with what I said, and with TPU being an outlier.

Attached: firefox_2019-01-19_12-25-47.png (583x322, 66K)

The 1000 line was destroyed by the bitcoin mining inflation prices. 2060 is actually reasonable finally.

1070TI: 94%
2060: 97%
1080: 99%

From OP image
Can you do basic arithmetic?
Do you realize it's closer to the 1080?

Great now at least you understand that you're a subhuman

That's dishonest tho, it varies from game to game.

Go average them all up from Gamersnexus review. The 2060 is similar to the 1070Ti. The 2070 is barely above the 1080, not 10% above.
TPU is an outlier who followed Nvidia's new review guide very closely.

>it's better than the 1080!
>actually I meant worse
>being within 3% isn't comparable!
>NO YOU'RE THE RETARD

Here are my posts:
Quickly, point out where I said it was nowhere near the 1080.
Oh wait.
You can't.

Attached: 1361173054815.jpg (315x315, 12K)

YOU'RE A FUCKING RETARD.

I have to put training wheels to this conversation.

If you have three numbers 3, 5 and 6

Lets say you get 5, now if someone says it's comparable to 3 and another person says it's comparable to 6, who's more correct?
BUT 3 IS SO CLOSE TO 5!!
Who cares, there is another discrete option that is closer.

KILL
YOUR
SERFU

Hello dishonest fuck.
I can play that game too.

Attached: rtx-2060-fc5-4k.png (877x964, 98K)

calm down bro

Attached: tomsnvmerchant.png (500x500, 70K)

>unironic all-caps
>wasteful double spacing
>completely unable to address the argument and has to invent a strawman to knock down
Yeah, we're done here.

HAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHA
I love how when I explained it to you like you were a 5yo, you understood and had to find something to attack.

Love it.
It's just frustrating having so many stupid people around me.
Why don't you stupid people just go somewhere so us smarties don't have to deal with you.

Also, can you admit you were wrong?
It would be the only redeeming quality you have.
I doubt you would.

>strawman
>somehow 94 is closer to 97 than 99

Read the posts, I never claimed anything else, the 2060 is closer to 1080 than to 1070Ti, you claimed that it was closer to 1070Ti.

>but it's closer to 1070Ti
Sure but there are things closer, that's how relative numbers work, you pick the closest not the second closest and pretend that's how comparisons work.

>2060 BAD!!
>It's OVERPRICED!!!!

Attached: performance-per-dollar_2560-1440.png (500x1050, 54K)

s-stop it
you're brainwashed by nvidia haha, you're being manipulated!!!

GUYS WE MUST SUPPORT AMD, IT'S OUR DUTY TO SPEND OUR MONEY FOR THEM!!

What point are you trying to make?
That shows the same thing, that the 2060 is barely above the 1070Ti and the 2070 is barely above the 1080.

You need to get your head checked if you think you're contradicting anything I posted.

>msrp of x60 card up by over 50%
Stop kvetching, goy, buy it! It just works!

Anyone who bought into this RTX beta is a complete retard.

my point is that it depends on each game.
For example this pic related

Attached: rtx-2060-sottr-1440p.png (810x923, 85K)

Nice try shlomo but actually it's weaker than a vega 56 and much weaker than 1080

Attached: RPX0xPN.png (770x845, 100K)

So if I want non-shitty performance what do I buy right now?

Thought so.Bye.

what is SOTTR?

A second hand pascal card.

Damn 2060 OC'd hits same FPS as 2070 in that game.

Exactly, 2060 is weaker than a vega 56!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The numbers are right there faggot and it's based on hundreds of samples not some random kike ((((((((review))))))))

shadow of the tomb raider
>second hand
kys, right fucking now

thanks user

You type like an imbecile so I'm going to assume you're one. I gave you a solution, if you're too retarded to apply it then you should fuck off.

Yes I agree with you, 2060 is definitely weaker than a Vega 56

Will RTX 2060 6GB VRAM be its achilles heel anytime soon?

I'm not convinced that the 2080 Ti is good. Lots of Newegg reviews talking about failures.

>type like an imbecile
Yikes.
Great solution.
What's that, X is expensive, then find somethign cheaper somewhere!

What's that, you have a problem, well then, my solution is to SOLVE IT.

Amazing tips, thank god you exist.

only if you want to play higher than 1080p

>yikes
Go back to plebbit you fucking child.

Attached: 1369160293252.jpg (300x260, 29K)

2060 not worth it, it's much weaker than a Vega 56.

>rationalizing spending more than $100 extra for a $250 card

Attached: marcus macaroni.jpg (750x750, 81K)

I don't. I have a 1080p monitor and a GTX 750ti at the moment and I'm looking for a new GPU. Would 2060 be a good upgrade?

You should close this tab and resume to your /b/ tab

>1070 barely above the 590
lol
Anyway, that still shows the 2070 as worse than the 1080. TPU shows the 2070 as 10% better. 1080 OC still beats the 2060 OC. 2060 barely beats the Vega 56 as well which you can often get for

You need to go back, ESL.

Objective values exist!
Absolute state

No just get a 580 or 590. It's pointless to get more for 1080p@60, you're just throwing money away.
The 580 is already over 3x the performance of a 750Ti to begin with.

upgrading to a 580 now is retarded

580 already struggles to get 60fps in some aaa games now

Sure thing /b/rother, we gotta troll (it's a meme ya dip)
Problem Hhahahha
TROLLFACE

580
or vega 56/1070ti for some more moneys

Holy fuck you're embarrassing. How sad do you have to be to shill for goyvidia on Saturday of all days? Do they at least pay you?

Attached: 1436854546240.jpg (480x542, 27K)

I'll pay $50 more for a used 1080ti

Why is everyone recommending 580 and 1060 for 1080p 60Hrz

There are plenty of titles where those cards get 50-60fps AVERAGE

That means there's dips into 40's and 30's
If I see dip in the 50's I puke.
I'm not visually impaired like you, I like >60 fps minimums.

based hahah
trollface.jpg

our secret club is secure, those plebitors will never find us :)

Rankings

Vega 64
Vega 56
SHIT
POO
2060

We have proof that Vega 56 is better than a 2060

just wait a few months for GTX 1160

But's much weaker than a 2060 tho
Literally something between a 1060 and a 1070, aka trash bin

>compatible
>same price
>less memory

>comes in 100 skus

no, objective value is a b-stock or used 1080. 2060 would be the best objective value at sub $250, just like every other xx60 card since the 260.

it will be 2060 without the meme tracing
i would say 20% cheaper

nope
It has much less CUDA cores, the consensus is slightly lower than 1070

>Why is everyone recommending 580 and 1060 for 1080p 60Hrz
>There are plenty of titles where those cards get 50-60fps AVERAGE
Because maxed settings looks exactly the same as very high settings in those games where they struggle.
Those maxed settings are just there to make the game run worse, not look better.

Hell, virtually all games from the past 3 years look better on 1440p medium than on 1080p maxed. That's how much of a joke max settings are.

what is an absolute minimum of a card for 1440p

>Those maxed settings are just there to make the game run worse, not look better.
I keep hearing this but I see no proof, might be a coping placebo rationalization to think like that.

Video games are bad for your soul because they keep you in place and waste your time.

Can everyone itt please go back to /v/?

Being loyal to a hardware company is low IQ. Pick whatever is best when you're upgrading. Sometimes it's AMD, sometimes Nvidia.

These thread kind of remind me of football fans lol.

1070 is the 1440p card

what r u smokin
lmao 2060 is at least 1070ti level and im many instances it surpasses and reaches gtx1080 levels

>no proof
Because you've literally closed your eyes to it if you can't boot up a game from the past 3 years, change settings from maxed to the next level down ie very-high, and claim you see a difference.

RX580/590 will generally do that, but Vega56 or a 2060/1070Ti is better. Used 1070 is also an option if you can get one around $200.

Techspot puts 2070 7%, computerbase 8%, hardware.info 9% and toms 10% above 1080. These were the first sites I found that had average performance across the whole set. TPU's 13% seems a little high, but it's not that unusual. They're definitely not "roughly equal" like you said.

It's usually not exactly the same, but this.
In other games, it's a setting or two that do little visually but are very demanding. Like Post processing in bf5 that makes a 30-40% difference for me, and I cant tell which looks better. I can see that some reflections are different, but not really better.

In MHW, turning off the volumetric fog looks better and almost doubles your FPS.

BFV originally looked worse with ray tracing turned on due to the culling errors and issues with the ray tracing itself which doesn't "just work". It does look better now day it overlaps SSR and DXR, but still, virtually everyone agreess that high resolution with DXR off looks better than lower resolution needed to run DXR.

>I set the retail price for a card
these are the retards that find their way to Jow Forums now