WHAT IS THE BEST LINUX?

DON'T SAY FOR WHAT JUST GIVE ME THE FUCKING BEST

Attached: Untitled.png (633x711, 524K)

Other urls found in this thread:

distrochooser.de/en
chromium.arnoldthebat.co.uk/
storage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html?prefix=Linux_ChromiumOS_Full/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

There is no best Linux, it's all fundamentally the same.

Debian GNU/Linux

>There is no best Linux, it's all fundamentally the same.

ONE HAS THE BE THE BEST PICK ONE

Attached: images.jpg (234x216, 4K)

LINUX 4.20 SINCE ITS THE NEWEST LINUX RIGHT NAO!!1!!11!!!!!

Attached: 1547561910543.png (515x286, 99K)

ChromeOS

Debian

based and passive consumerpilled

Zen kernel.

xubuntu

Attached: f2a774f8-7186-47c6-a497-4d7a40f707ca.jpg (590x436, 41K)

Arch

TempleOS

Automated and curated Beyond Linux From Scratch.

I would say debian or arch, but they have systemd.
So, the real answer is, none.

Android

Arch Linux

Slackware

Ubuntu/Mint with any desktop environment you want
apt is noob friendly enough and you can literally left click install .deb packages, and use snaps for everything else, literally just works.

Fedora for Desktop
CentOS for Server

Devuan ftw

I use Debian for both but I respect your choice, it's pretty sane and reasonable.

The one you're using.

Manjaro because it's number one on distrowatch

If you put it that way, probably Ubuntu (in its various flavors).

4.20.3

Slackware but unironically. Now fuck off.

linux

this is a wet dream of mine

To the kind of person who says there has to be one best, I'd say you're looking for Artix

4.18.20

FreeBSD

Gentoo.

Attached: 1539834083568.png (540x474, 425K)

KDE Neon is the general best Linux distro, if excluding specific usecases
>poo ez install, just like stock Ubuntu
>Plasma 5 is simple enough for normans to understand OOTB (Windows 10 copied Plasma 5 and anyone who disagrees doesn't know how to use a search engine)
>Plasma is extremely easy to rice for non normans, graphical tools for such are everywhere
>400-600mb RAM idle depending on how much eye candy and bloated daemons you're using, none of which are there by default, unlike Kubuntu, so it can run decently on a toaster OOTB
>compositor can be disabled with alt+shift+f12, furthering the toaster argument
>KDE Connect BTFOS Applel and Wangblows (though Wangblows never even had a half decent syncing system to begin with)
>best x compositor available
>Wayland is an immediate option, despite this
>many other reasons that would exceed the character limit
Let's all love Neon

Attached: neo1.jpg (3840x2160, 561K)

linucs arco

Attached: how to instal starch loonix.jpg (2170x1070, 519K)

Ubuntu

Fedora

They are all shit because of the high amount of autism the community is run by.

Attached: 02f28b7d01488fd0606e31c78ba1a719c54846d2d5aaf4019a7dfea03f1457fc.jpg (320x180, 11K)

>That is the best Linux?
The one that you don't have to keep switching or reinstalling... The one that just works.

MacOS X

They are all shit. Linux is a hobbyist OS for basement dwelling, lonely and unloved incel rejects like pedos and ricers who suffer from a multitude of mental disorders.

Attached: 1538773472533.jpg (1200x1200, 255K)

Fedora
SELinux on by default
Packages from this decade

Ubuntu

For what?

For what?

they all run the same on Virtualbox

Red Star OS

Manjaro, just perfect.

Debian/Fedora/Cent OS depending on your needs, you won't get a better answer you dumb fuck.

If I had to pick one, Debian.

Attached: 1543359364879.jpg (1280x720, 347K)

Linux Mint

linux from scratch/crux

GuixSD GNU/Linux-libre

Go for Ubuntu since things usually just work. If you want to spends hours upon hours fixing minor shit that is supposed to work out of the box. I.e sound not working or some other random fucking driver install any other OS.

Linux is cancer so pick your poison. I would of course pick the least sodomizing destro. They are all the same anyway one work the other doesn't.

distrochooser.de/en

Attached: 1460665825766.jpg (252x200, 14K)

heh i got devuan from this and im using devuan. happy with it btw

says the other autist

Loonics is a kernel, you idiot.
Having shit brain doesn't mean it's all shit

Xubuntu. You have your answer now go.

This is easy, you should be using Caldera Systems OpenLinux 2.2.

Linux from Scratch, because it covers the broadest possible use range.

5.0 has been out for several weeks.

Attached: best-linux.jpg (174x216, 10K)

Attached: corel-linux.png (1024x768, 463K)

Install gentoo

pearjuice on Aug 26, 2013 | parent | favorite | on: What would you like to see most in minix? (1991)

What you guys are referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

If you want to completely ignore what you personally need your distro to do or to be, just go with Gentoo. It can be whatever you want.

ubuntu/mint -> manjaro/debian -> arch/gentoo

just upgrade once you feel comfortble. It's also a scale from functional -> autistic

arnold the bats builds chromium.arnoldthebat.co.uk/
or storage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html?prefix=Linux_ChromiumOS_Full/
i got void

Linux mint with Unity desktop.

Arch. Tards gonna tard, but they know it's true

I'd like to interject for a mom-

No it hasn't.

Attached: IMG_20190118_161237.jpg (811x670, 70K)

Mint XFCE

Deepin

The latest release.
Linux distro - ubuntu.

Half of this shit you don't need to do. Stop being a retard making it hard for yourself.

fedora desktop
arch laptop

Tumbleweed KDE on the 4.20 kernel.

Tumbleweed KDE on the 4.18 kernel

>Windows
debian

No, fren, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?

(An operating system)!= (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Thanks for listening.

Toke up.

Attached: LOL weed.jpg (1920x1080, 236K)