A programmer was arrested for writing unreadable code.
He refused to comment.
A programmer was arrested for writing unreadable code.
He refused to comment.
op can i marry you
link?
Oops.. I know what my code is supposed to do everyone else can figure it out
How do I subscribe to your blog
Upvoted
epic
I call this Pepe variation "Bimmy"
How do you make a napkin dance?
Put a little boogie in it
There are 10 types of people. People who understand binary and people who don't.
What about those that can understand octal?
5 genderbinary people and 5 genderfluid people? and the former does understand binary?
cephalopods are appetizers, not people
What lawyers and sperm have in common?
One of them in a billion have a chance to become a human being.
CUTE !
What's the object-oriented way to become wealthy?
Inheritance
>Apple Watch
>Grindr
Of course.
A phone without headphone jack
Jow Forumswhoosh
and those who confuse it for ternary
What are 10 lawyers in the bottom of the lake? A good start.
bullshit
post source
Shouldn't it be 2 types
It's not comments that make code easy. Only simple minded beginners think that.
Actually, it's about structure and documentation.
Jow Forumswhoosh
r/whoosh
Lost
lmao.
A facebook fucktard. Of course.
The main benefit of SharePoint is that it solves 50% of the problems you didn't have in the first place.
Which is the favourite programming language of libertarians? Haskell. So functions don't rely on the state.
Why a facebook fucktard exactly?
go back
Filename
It's official then
How do you change your MAC address?
Just use Windows!
>searching for images on facebook
yeah nah. You just type the shit you want, download it and be done with it. You have to be retarded to trust filenames
Hahahaha omfg I love this pic hahahaha can I have it lol?
I wonder what his nose smells like lol hahaha wondering for a friend
There are 10 types of people. People who understand binary, people who don't. And people who thought this joke wasn't in ternary.
Jow Forumswhoosh
Did you really have to point it out for people who don't know what Jow Forums means?
Oh no no no no hahahahaha
I know it's all about being cool and on 9001 levels of irony now but I have to admit I got some chuckles out of this thread. Keep it up
underrated
based haha poster
oh the ironing
Bless your heart
imagine thinking youve seized an opportunity to roast someone on Jow Forums, but subsequently awaking from your dillusion only to discover that youre still a reddit cocksucker.
>years ago people would make mspaint OC drawing of an arrow going over user's head
>today zoomers just type reddit shit
cringe.
BIMMY AND JIMMY???
Now THIS is humour thread!
Kek
He should be in an L Ron Hubbard biopic
Kys
thanks for the pepe, completes my collection
What happens when you collect all 10 Pepes?
Good thread until a redditard came.
You ascend.
This is a good thread
{ 'shouldn't it be 2 types' ? 'kys' : 'carry on' }
epic thread OP
pic related
Good code should actually contain zero comments.
this
if you have to write supporting literature immediately around your code, changes are you could also take the time to simplify it as well. good code should speak for itself and shouldn't make you have to double take
gottem
>t. brainlet who codes fizzbuzz all day every day and never worked on a project with some level of complexity that inevitably requires comments to clarify some of the deliberate decisions made that would otherwise be impossible to decipher for anyone who didn't write the code
you may now kill yourself, my man.
Nice try, but no. Good comments explain 'why', and you don't need to explain 'why' on a line-by-line basis, per function is acceptable but preferably the code should self-document and the only comments should usually be per-module and on interfaces for external consumption. The fact you and other Jow Forumsnubs use the know-it-all comeback of
>t. brainlet who codes fizzbuzz
makes your deceit all the more egregious.
Sorry to shit up your based thread OP.
t.
int v; // this is the value
return v; returns the value
// this sums x and y
int z = x - y;
>w-wait, the comment seems to be lying, maybe it was outdated? who wrote this? or is it a bug in the code? damn, who wrote this? i need to ask him
No thanks. I've seen these so often in """production code""" that it's not funny amymore.
Glad I don't have to work with you.
Your python skills are shit and here's why:
>the apostrophe in shouldn't should be escaped
>the question mark should be within the string
Read more on Python dictionaries user, you need it