>tfw you love your resolution so much but it's a rare and dying breed

Attached: 12.png (1920x1200, 40K)

Other urls found in this thread:

exhentai.org/g/1342333/e5de2e1882/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I have to use something just under 1080p because of the weird fucked up TV I'm using. It's like 1768x996 or something

I loved it too, but i've moved on to 3840x2160 @ 32"

I'll never look back.

>yfw 1680 x 1050 never took off

Attached: tears_crying_girl_anime_92287_1680x1050[1].jpg (1680x1050, 509K)

I'm jelly, user. I'll get there someday.

Who ever decided a TV needs permanent overscan should be shot
Thank god TVs have gotten so PC friendly in the last few years, you can now get a perfectly PC usable 4k display for $300

I used a 4k display for a while and while definitely IS nice I didn't like how much power you need to push all those pixels. I mean it makes sense on a big screen but in my case I prefer 24inch displays since I don't like to stare a fucking wall all the time. 1920x1200 @ 24inch is the absolute sweetspot for me.

1600pfag reporting in!

1440x900 should've been as widespread as 1366x768. fucking hell why is that god damn resolution still being used to this day? I really can't stand 16:9

I will never give up 16:10. Not now. Not after I've known that it truly is the ratio of the gods.

same, it's just so fucking pleasing to look at

tfw you buy a new 1920x1200 laptop and its really great

Attached: 2433259701514835336.jpg (2048x1152, 118K)

The patricians resolution. My 24" 16:10 LCD is 11 years old now. I already had to repair it once due to failed caps. I can't believe everyone is normalized to 16:9. It is a travesty.

your beloved resolution makes you unique and easy to track

Why not 4k @ 24inch?

Attached: 4E31D4D6-611E-4C11-B767-DC6565D4CA90.jpg (208x250, 14K)

>tfw reusing 1200 display from my old d800

Attached: 1541852751815.jpg (728x1231, 125K)

As I said, don't like bigger than 24" because I have the monitor on the desk in front of the window and I like to have a nice view out of it while still having a decent monitor size. Just prefer having the monitor there. Then going higher than 1920x1200 would stress my shit too much and I don't spend money on shit I don't necessarily need. My computer is perfectly sufficient for my work an recreation shit and upgrading just because I don't want to make out individual pixels is a shit deal in my opinion. But that's just me.

Also to clarify, especially at 24" I don't see why I should go for 4k when it might look kinda neat but otherwise has no advantage for me.

16:10 triggers me harder than Linux faggots.

Attached: 1548609339101.jpg (750x581, 461K)

HA! That's one of those chinese custom driver boards you get on ebay, right?
How much did you pay for yours?

post comic

Why? 4:3 is okay too, especially great for laptops but 16:10 just feels right for desktop use.

I got you senpai
exhentai.org/g/1342333/e5de2e1882/

Attached: 001.jpg (1280x1809, 341K)

Watching 2560x1600 lose to 2560x1440 was painful, and seeing 2560x1080 ultra-"wide" (i.e., short) eat into that segment is even worse, but 43" UHD has been a comfortable new home. It's at least big enough that I don't even really notice that it's not 16:10 anymore.

~40" 8k can't come soon enough though.

Less than $30.

that's a great deal

anything =

Just get 2 monitors for work?

>liking a resolution and not an aspect ratio

YIKES

NPCs bleat and cry if fullscreen netflix has visible black bars. That's literally it.

fug, all of them are slightly different, why did industry change the Ratio several times?

see:
1600 / 1200 = 1.333
1920 / 1200 = 1.6
1366 / 768 = 1.77

Jow Forums is the only place I've ever heard people complain about black bars. Also, consider the prevalence of 8:5 screens on Macbooks.

This.

my TV uses 1360x768.

Attached: 3DC04038150D46E89EDA963E7890D1F2.jpg (560x560, 210K)

1440p master race reporting in. (Computer is 5 and a half years old, BTW, and I've no need for a replacement.)

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-01-28 at 2.42.48 AM.png (228x261, 37K)

what anime is this from

>imac
You're part of no master race, faggot.

I videotape weddings in 4K, and this iMac has no problem editing it. What do you do?

(((Marriage)))

>16:10
>not 8:5
y tho

>16:9 screen
>when computer needs replacing, have to chuck a perfectly good monitor
kys

>What do you do?
edit 4k on a 5k screen.

3:2 is the perfect ratio, imo. Even more vertical space than 16:10.

It's the one thing that Microsoft really nailed it on with the Surface line.

There are rumors that they will come out with a stand alone 3:2 desktop monitor in the next year or two. I will definitely buy it if it comes out.

got 43" uhd for normal pixel density.
how do you like 32" uhd for office stuff?

Patrician tier: Two 16:9 or 16:10s, vertical and portrait
Turboghettonigger tier: Everything else

Attached: 1293379248938.jpg (1050x1050, 122K)

16:9 is fine once you go above 1080p. Particularly 4k, there is so much real estate the ratios stop mattering.

>2009: 16:10
>2019: 24:10
Get with the times, grandpa.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 162K)

>fagOS

I'm using a 1440x900 monitor right now to browse Jow Forums while I watch a show on my 1080P monitor. Pretty great desu.

>trashcan mac
wew lad

>turn a 16x9 monitor sideways.

BOOM. Vertical room 4 dayzzz

2560x1080p
Regular 1080p 16:9 is shit I can barely stand it on my phone.
Waiting for decent 4k oled displays before I make the switch

:9 screen
>>when computer needs replacing, have to chuck a perfectly good monitor

When I SELL the still valuable 6 year old computer, the buyer will have a good monitor matched to it.

I hope nobody is delusional enough to buy a AIO that's been slowly cooking itself for 6 years because apple cant into thermals.

I'm using 1680x1050 right now, I want to upgrade to 3840x2400

given it's Jow Forums, you love your resolution so much because it's a rare and dying breed.

16:9 should be illegal.
Along with case windows.

1680_1050 master race here
Kek

I have one of these.
In fact all my monitors before 1080p were weird res. 1280x1024, 1440x900, 1680x1050

Yep.

I would love some 120hz IPS panels with a 16:10 aspect ratio. But I can't find anything in my country.

Attached: specgay.png (772x526, 38K)

Literally me

>59hz

Attached: hehe.gif (340x340, 144K)

I feel your pain.

1680x1050p here. Best gaming resolution
Acer V223W

What do you mean it's a "dying breed"?
If they stop producing them then just grab an old one.

It's not like there's gonna be any significant display improvement if CRTs from the 90s are 100% up for the modern tasks.

it's perfect

you went full retard with that post.

3840x1620 34"
I hate how ultrawides ruin everything. Once you go ultrawide, everything else feels like shit.

Attached: 1547960653697.jpg (1080x1350, 90K)

I used that resolution for 14 years.

i dont mind that for games, high enough that it doesnt look like complete shit, but not so high that it was resource hungry back on older hardware.

As i have a GTX1080 these days i just dont either bothing playing anything lower than 1080p, 1440p or 4k is my chosen resolution for games now.

ultrawide hips are not a meme.

Based.
1x 1680x1050 and 2x 1440x900

Attached: IMG_20190123_151314.jpg (4160x2340, 2.18M)

This, no need to waste money on a dead resolution

>tfw 1360x768

Attached: 1520226368737.png (386x366, 183K)

Why is 16:10 dying its peak comfy I just got an x201 and am liking the extra height

>1,366x768
Retro PC love

Attached: 151921-norcent-vion-lt-2090wbk.jpg (400x382, 15K)

My old (now secondary) monitor is 1280x1024 (5:4), it was fantastic for 4:3 things since it left space for the taskbar/controls/etc at the top and bottom.
16:10 is comfy as fuck too, probably my favourite aspect ratio as of now.

My eyes are crap so why would i need more than 1080p?! I rather have more Hz and fps in games than a couple more pixels i can't see anyway.

Using 1280x1024 and two 1366x768 monitors is patrician poorfag setup

Attached: 2019-01-13-1547434029.png (2646x1024, 3.59M)

Hot

I bought a korean monitor 5 years ago that uses that same panel(has the camera hole cutout). Still going strong. Glad I didn't have to get rid of it when I upgraded my GPU though.

at least we can be thankful that only premium monitors use 16:10

Sad that this really didn't become more popular. People are still very surprised when I show them my old dell laptop from 2004 that was doing 1920x1200, while they complain that they could only get 720p in 2012.

>not a word about 1366x720 masterrace
what the fuck?

Attached: epic.jpg (800x600, 29K)

%s/720/768
woopsie

>not having the 1600:900 version

>no 1:1 perfectly square monitors
>no displays projected inside of a glass orb so I can pretend to be a wizard

Oh but muh rectangle!!!!

>no 1:1 perfectly square monitors
get fucked

Attached: photo_big.jpg (1500x1000, 299K)

there is no x220 1600x900. Only t420

amen

Is that princess Leia?

1440x900 best rez in best laptop

Attached: l_kn_x201s_01.jpg (640x480, 139K)

man those screens fucking suck
the 900p one on my x200s might as well be monochrome. Also 50hz only why

god damn I despise the old thinkpad screens
everything else is perfect but the display gives me eye cancer

Wow that shit looks absolutely atrocious in terms of contrast, luminance. Absolutely everything basically.

3840x1080, no regrets.

yall pussies

I've turned mine sideways and set it next to my 1440p 32" monitor. PPI is nearly identical, and it works really well in portrait since it's not as skinny as a 16:9 monitor would be in portrait.

You memein but 38" 3840 x 1600 is super comfy.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 152K)