Name more pathetic (((browser))) than br*ve

>browse up to x8 faster
...

I don't get why Mozilla doesn't sue them. This is deformation without any evidence whatsoever which is illegal in both burger land and EEA

Please post the link to this. I will unironicaly sue them I am a European Economic Area resident and this will make sure Brave will either pay Mozilla or get banned inside Europe.

Not defamation because it's true

Did you ever bother to read Braves source. They have telemetry that cannot be disabled (and even blatantly lie about it)'

Also since it is Chromium based using it will inform Google and other CDNs of your entire browsing history due to fingerprinting.

Brave is Brendan faggot eichs desperate attempt to milk some money from Indian brainlets and now apparently even Europeans fall for it.

even if it was true (which it isn't) they provide not a single bit of evidence. that is the literal definition of defamation. Brendan should sure hope he doesn't show this to European users.

this is true. those news articles are based on your website habits. mine always gives me articles about procrastination, politics and for some reason wedding bands. my mom on her firefox gets way different articles

Lol this.

>maybe if i use the parenthesis thing and star thingy at bad names they'll think i'm one of them and totally not a shill

>installs software
>doesn't read privacy policy nor official wiki

Tbh Every Browser by default should be the most botnet possible. It makes brainlets like you pay for intellectuals like me. All browsers are. But Firefox is the only browser that allows you and even explains in specific detail how to disable even the most redundant of networking "features"

compare that to Brave where they literally force telemetry onto you without being able to disable it

But he didn't shill. Think what happens for any single company that puts up an ad like this. Everyone would laugh at them. But if a company with an owner who has a known history of malicious acts does it it is fine?

The only shills are people pro Brave.

Already forgot that one guy couple days ago that even admitted to being an Indian paid Brave shill?

your assuming I don't want this feature. I do configure most of firefox like that but I like the news features and I trust based mozilla with my browsing habits

And where does it say Brave doesn't know a lot about you as well there? You can think it's scummy all you want but it's not defamation because Firefox does know a lot more about you than your location, just like every browser

See above. It is true.
Saying something without providing a source is hardly the definition of defamation no matter how much you want to stroke that EU cock it's not illegal there either.

Dunno about browsers, but I sure can't name more pathetic (((faggot))) than *P

>brainlet

Whether you use Chrome, Firefox or Brave won't make a single difference for you.

>I love having my browsing habits sold and the having them serve ads back to me

correct. I trust mozilla

Then provide me with the link. I will non ironically sue them in an EU court.

You are just a paid shill or a communist.

Mozilla has an official wiki explaining how to disable any single connection Firefox initiates. And it works I check the source and sniff the traffic.

Brave contrary even admits to sending IP at regular intervals without being able to be disabled. But sure go take your 5 rupees out of Eichs gay asshole

how am I a brainlet? fuck you bitch I will kill you irl

fucking test me kid

>I will non ironically sue them in an EU court.

Based

So according to your expression you definitely checked the source of Firefox and sniffed the traffic. Explain the part to me where a single link someone browsers ever leaves the browser.

Fyi the feature he is talking about downloads a huge list of links and then compares it locally to what links he visited and as thus recommends. It is literally open source

but hey. 5 rupees you clearly gonna lie for I mean 5 rupees you'd probably not earn this in 5 years would you

thats right bitch dont respond. ur fucking scared

I don't have a link, I don't even use brave because I dislike chromium forks. I don't know where op got that image. I don't care which browser you decide to use or or not because I'm not autistic.
Having guides on disabling something doesn't make that statement any less accurate and if you had read my post you would know that whether brave does the same or not is irrelevant.
They said "Firefox knows far more about you than just your location", that statement isn't a lie no matter how angry it makes you feel.
And no you won't sue them because you're sad larper.

Mozilla has admitted they use AdSense on several of their pages including the add-on page for "internal use"
Check gorhill github where he complained about because addons can't clock about:pages

>thats right bitch dont respond. ur fucking scared
That's just pathetic man

post the link to.ops image and I will instantly sue them. Gonna see it next week on news. Though I need the link for it.

Any browser including. rave knows more than your location. The only difference is that For Firefox you can disable it all.

>instantly sue them
Just go find it yourself larper

Absolutely based.

My main issue with Brave is that there's a shitcoin attached to it so it will always be stained by greedy chinks and pajeets trying to dump their bags on others.
Can't use that shit

teach me how to instantly sue

cringepilled

based and redpilled

truly niggerlicious

Chrome. It is literal spyware.

but brave IS chrome

So Brave is selective spyware?

I use Icecat and Ungoogled-chromium.

Attached: 1548485434152.jpg (152x169, 9K)

Brave is not chrome. Brave is based on chromium. They are two different things. Brave rewrites a lot of chromium's shit. Eich posted a bit about it on twitter.

>slap a few settings in user.js
>no more botnet/spyware
>completely and demonstraby disabled
>"dur hur firefox is botnet"
>google is much much wors--
>"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE LA LA LA I CANT HEAR U INSTALL BRAVE"
>but brave still has spyware you can't disab--
>"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FURRYC U C K SHILL STFU U BEEN BTFO BAKA DESU SENPAI LMAO"

Attached: 1537894775781.jpg (482x253, 41K)

>vivaldi and firefox
true shit
>opera
inb4 muh ram usage

>there's a shitcoin attached to it
Besides Google, Bitcoins are the biggest threat to the internet and computers in general.The world of malware revolves around this shit. Cash out now faggots, you're killing everything.

Exactly!

But does it still have hidden extension that records you for not disabling the telemetry?

Attached: 1545976704932.jpg (348x342, 23K)

no spyware.neocities.org/guides/firefox.html

reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/akitmg/brave_gone_too_far/

redditor used inspect element to change "chrome" to "firefox" and rile up trannyfox users.

Attached: download (7).png (752x529, 205K)

Its true, that's why. Note I don't use brave or firefox, suck ma dic shills.

How about this? from this ghacks.net/2018/09/21/mozilla-wants-to-estimate-firefoxs-telemetry-off-population/

Attached: 1518333853443.png (748x265, 12K)

>protect your privacy
>brave
>we run 8x faster than whatever browser you're thinking of
Why the fuck are they still clickbaiting and false advertising? You don't have any privacy with Brave and Firefox can be infinitely more private than it without adding a single addon because parts of the engine have been built specifically for protecting user privacy with the tor patches merging. Chrome/Brave can't say the same.
>brave auto updates
>brave runs in background (on android) even after being killed, possibly to fetch adblock lists
>brave anti-fingerprinting and adblocking doesn't even work, making it's """private""" tor tabs useless
It's a literal shit browser.

That's because it's edited to trigger cucks like you.

I don't think you understand what "cuck" means, autist.

A comment on that page from Yuliya is interesting
>Three days ago I posted a comment here on the last few articles how Mozilla had sent “[email protected]” without my consent to a Firefox 62 installation running on a LTSB 1607 inside a virtual machine.
>
>The next day the situation repeated on my actual PC, running Windows 7 and Firefox 62. However, there was another addon there besides the aforementioned “fxmonitor” malware. It was called “[email protected]”. Every test, auto updater, everything auto and everything telemetry related is disabled from settings and then about:confing entries. I clearly opted out of telemetry yet I was sent this malware, and no matter how many times I was removing it, it kept coming back. The solution was to break Firefox’s access from a folder called “features” inside my profile folder.
>...

Trying to get ungoogled chromium to work on windows.

Really maeks you think.

Lamaoing at Firecucks. Can't wait to see your marketshare getting divided and conquered and finally adopting Chromium as base.

Why are you advocating for less competition? Serious question

>Mozilla has admitted they use AdSense on several of their pages including the add-on page for "internal use"

Attached: 13.png.jpg (1276x248, 77K)

Chrome

>they provide not a single bit of evidence
You say that as if they needed to.
I mean, I'm a Firefox user myself, but I do know perfectly well that not only the guy is not lying, I remember that Firefox is an open source browser too.
Finding proof to his claims wouldn't take more than a few minutes to someone like him, I'd assume.

pale moon

>My main issue with Brave is that there's a shitcoin attached to it so it will always be stained by greedy chinks and pajeets trying to dump their bags on others.
>Can't use that shit
No you won't unless you go out of your way to enable it retard.

ghacks.net/2018/09/21/mozilla-wants-to-estimate-firefoxs-telemetry-off-population/
askvg.com/tip-disable-telemetry-and-data-collection-in-mozilla-firefox-quantum/
github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-ios/wiki/Mozilla's-Telemetry-Service-Pings
restoreprivacy.com/firefox-privacy/
It's not made up at all.

based and redpilled. that is the question you should always ask yourself

Seriously people, compile your FF from source.
Or if you do not know how to compile get iceweasel from your repo.
And always use Tor when you can and limit the amount of online services you use.

why bravefags even post on Jow Forums
I can see dumb /v/ermins and Jow Forumsacks falling for their tricks, but do they really believe that Jow Forumsentoomen would ever use their shitty botnet browser? I mean, nu-Jow Forums zoomers can't be that bad, right?

when a product talks about competition in it's first line u just know it's trash

This has to be a record for the most buzzwords in one post.

Well, how do you explain this then?

Explain what exactly? What he said is the truth, Brave IS trash when compared to Firefox.
What Brandon or whatever his name is said in Brave's page is true, but it is also true that you have 2 solid ways to disable every trace of telemetry and tracking within Firefox, something you cannot do with Brave.
And there's one more truth to be told here, when you have nothing good to say about your own browser and you have to talk about something else instead to get your point across? That means your product is definitely trash.
Although all in all, that's not surprising considering it's Chromium based.

>something you cannot do with Brave.
Source?

Describing brave browser:
>she persisted

You're retarded. You don't have to source your claims, so long as they're true. It's good practice to, but you can't sue someone for saying true things about you just because they didn't provide a source (but one exists). It's factually correct to say that Firefox knows more about you than just your location. How much that matters, and whether Brave does the same thing, is irrelevant.

...

holy fuck, does that mean i can watch 8 porn videos in the same time as 1 in firefox???

fuck this Chrome skin called Brave, so much fuss about a product that's not even done by them

Brave is a botnet.
Firefox is a botnet.
Chrome is a botnet.

It's reality. Better deal with it instead fightig each other and use a non botnet browser like IceCat or tweak FF so it doesn't spy.

based and redpilled
shit-tier Chinese botnet btfo just like the chinks in the trade war

Why would they target Firefox like that? They want a part of that

Because brave is a chrome rebrand with more botnet added on top of it.

>Because brave is a chrome
Jesus Christ... An open source browser is based off of a proprietary implementation of Chromium? Do you even hear yourself?
>with more botnet added on top of it.
Oh yeah, where?
github.com/brave
Must be all the Ungoogled-chromium patches.

why is Brave registered as for-profit company you think? what a for-profit company is supposed to work? how does Brave make money?

it's true though.

uhm, read their wikipedia page? they had a clear business plan from the start. show acceptable ads, and provide a way to support webpages (like you would tip the sites, based on the amount of time you spend on them).

it's really not rocket science, and much better IMO than datamining the users. Chrome + Firefox now wants to kill adblockers in general, so there is really no other way forward.

even though I now you're one of their minions now but how is this Chrome skin going to block ads where it's literally Chrome+affblocker-acceptable ads? their whole repo is nothing but javascript, it's basically fucking Chrome

like vivaldi, you can extend on Chrome. and no I am not a "minion", I have not used Brave at all, because I found their lack of extensions...unacceptable.

been a Chrome user since it came out, it was always sooo much faster than Firefox. used BFilter to block ads back then. if they kill uBlock, I will go Brave though. its the only way.

are you retarded? Brave is basically Chromium and it uses the same APIs provided by Chromium just like Chrome, if they "hurt" adblockers (which they will not btw) Brave can do nothing about it

It's so pathetic that adding new ad blocking filters was assigned the lowest priority possible

Chrome was a lot faster than ff < 55. Currently chrome is still a bit better at loading pages, however sucks a big one when it comes down to actual interaction

Brave is FORKED from chromium and can do whatever the fucking hell it wants. Why is this so difficult for you inbreds to understand?

so Brave is going to be fixed at an old version while Chrome et al. are years ahead, great

Chomecucked Opera post 12.18

>(((acceptable ads)))
Finally you show your true colors. Fuck off, Brave shill. Unless the entire advertising industry gets a regulatory reckoning, no ads are acceptable ads.

>for means they can rewrite core parts wholesale
This is how I know that you’re some MBA marketing shitter who hasn’t written a single line of code before. This is a pathetic way to earn your shekels and I hope you get flayed alive when the (((data merchant))) empire you serve so faithfully gets destroyed.

Oh fucking fuck off. Everyone knows that those can only be seen if you go out of your way to enable BAT. Not the same person though.