This is what happens when you let the government have your private data

Perhaps. Although if you have a flu most schools and workplaces expect you to stay the fuck away so you dont infect others, and if you have some disease thats a public health risk the one to diagnose you will quarantine you.

>Goverment buys service from 3rd party
>Service gets hacked
>You see it's the goverments fault

Attached: 1547070006730.jpg (248x459, 18K)

This

This

This

I would say especially if it's lifelong and not temporary.
If we could somehow make it practical to automate adding and removing from this registry then sure for everything else too.

are you implying that you're okay with having aids?

this

Protip: HIV no more dangerous than having asthma. Medication allows people to live a normal life.

We should stop stigmatizing and sensationalizing HIV disclosure.

Someone on medication can't transfer HIV to you

Attached: Dx-9DLJXQAAPlq1.jpg (1024x298, 42K)

goverment lets itself get ripped off so yeah

you had me until you said gun owners
kys

stds are eugenic
it prevents normies from fucking like rabbits and reproducing faster than autists

>HIV people
>infects you and kills you
>gun owners
>shoots you and kills you

Both are groups that present an extremely elevated risk to the general population. I don't see the issue.

don't you fucking reproduce
kidshealth.org/en/parents/hiv.html
>HIV also can pass from mother to child during pregnancy, childbirth, or breastfeeding.

No. Hiding facts helps nobody.
Pretending like disease carriers are not still potentially dangerous is promoting ignorance. The whole basis here is that the person takes their medicine which cannot be assured. While their viral status can be assured if it was ever known in the first place.

so does the government
all police, military and 3 letter agents should have their identity and addresses revealed then i will agree

Better to just raise a traditional family and teach kids not to be so promiscuously stupid, the prevention itself will save everyone money

>have AIDS
>cut finger with chink case
>???
>die from chinkus bacterium.

meant for

> he has non-marital sex
cringe

think of it this way - if you're on the list people won't fuck with you.

You have no choice in Singapore. 100% totalitarian country, stricter than China.

If you refuse to have sex with somebody with aids, or try to force a person with aids to tell you they have it before having sex, you're a horrible person using a prejudice to attach a person for something that is literally nothing

Also it's not their problem if you get aids from them, just fucking deal with it

>just like gun owners
#ITWASHERTURN

Marriage has nothing to do with it.
Did you ever see that story about the abstinent Christian Russian who unknowingly dated a transexual for years and proposed to it.
He was tricked for the entirety of the relationship up until the point of consimation.
If you can hide that you can hide AIDS.

>"OOoga booga I'm gonna rape you with my pathriarcical dick"
>"Noo please don't!!! My body my choice"
>"I have aids"
>"Oh, Okay then, enjoy my body"

on the contrary, people will be trying to poke you with needles trying to get your gaids to give to people they hate.

This isn't even funny from a Poe's law perspective.
It's just not funny.

Literally trapped

>Although if you have a flu most schools and workplaces expect you to stay the fuck away
Is your place handling it like that? Do you get replacement lessons later and do you get paid leave from work or not?

HIV is fairly dangerous when you have it, but apart from blood transfusions and such the infection rate is actually low. See the table here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS#Transmission

Disclosing it only before sex or other such sub-percentage but at least noteworthy chances is good enough.

Nice try, Ezra.

Attached: 4chan_66.jpg (500x500, 50K)

Quality inflammatory post, chap.

HIV is like diabetes nowadays. You don't have to worry about it, just take a pill a day.

Attached: ivana-trump-before-after-plastic-surgery-1.jpg (590x350, 45K)

>you newer be trapped to marriage by cute russian boipucci

Attached: kjakj.jpg (767x450, 24K)

HIV isn’t a problem in developed countries these days. Medication makes the disease undetectable and untransmissable. Condoms are effective. PrEP taken daily will prevent you from getting it even if you’re exposed to HIV. There’s also PEP which you can take within 48 hours if you happen to be exposed with not on PrEP.

But unvaccinated children are a threat and should be documented and have their location data tracked. Their parents should also be euthanised for child abuse.

>just take a pill a day.
Yes, just take any of MY pills.

Attached: shrekli-cockli-trump.jpg (750x742, 58K)

>your life depends on medicine
>don't have to worry
I don't want aids or diabetes and neither do any of the diabetics I know.

if you really think that then your opinion if of no value to me.

>you don't have to worry about having Diabetes
fucking americans

Attached: 09d.jpg (400x400, 16K)

Do you have any idea how expensive that shit is?

Hey it's part of his culture. What are you, a bigot?

That's nonsense. If I have diabetes and fuck somebody, they won't catch diabetes from me. If I have AIDS and fuck somebody, they can catch it.

No because goverment pays my medicine. How these things are done in the burgerland?

I always wondered why republicans doesn't want gun owners to be recorded in a register, but voter registration is super important to them.

What if I accidentally drink your sugary piss and catch diabeetus too? I think I have a right to know.

Name ONE benefit of letting the government keep an index of all people with HIV.
Tip: you can't

HIV medication is free in my country and most of Europe.

>man gets hit by car
>gets put in hospital
>government observo-drone starts beeping
>"Aha! It's one of dem gays! Handle with care!"
>nobody caught aids that day
thanks observo-drone!

Creating government programs for disease containment
Publicly funded medication

There's two.

>No because goverment pays my medicine
I hope you realize this still comes out of tax dollars. If medical costs like this can be avoided it's better for the whole country. Saying "it's not a problem because it's not directly my problem" is not an excuse to be careless about contracting HIV. More HIV patients means more costs for everyone when socialism like that is employed.
Remember, you pay taxes too. More AIDS = higher taxes.

>Theres like a sub-culture of gays who find it hot to purposefully give aids to others with sabotaged condoms
Based, faggots getting what they deserve.

Using sick leave is pretty common here in socialism land, sometimes its paid altho people want it not to be so people abuse it less.
Lessons is pretty weird, if you slack off you fail the exam and thats that.

brb just going to donate some infected blood to the clinic while being an organ donor too

It should already be public information

>I hope you realize this still comes out of tax dollars.
Not neccesary there are also goverment own companies which make profit thus money can come from there faggot. But yeah even if it comes 100% from the tax "dollars" I don't complain

>I like unprotected sex
>Me too
>Do you have HIV ?
>Umm... no
>Let me check the database
>Um, yeah dude I think my mom just called me home, see ya
>You told me your parents called you a faggot and disowned you
>Well, this is awkward
And nobody got HIV that day.

and that's why everyone hates faggots like you

Alternatively you can choose not to have another mans penis ejaculate in your rectum.

I don't think it should be. People can't handle probabilities.

Put the probability of an airline's airplane crashes right next to where people order tickets and like 9/10 people will run straight to an unrated airline instead.

Unless you do it for all diseases, you'll turn HIV infected people into outcasts over the near fuckall risk they pose to public health.

>you can act as a human being that's not mentally ill
We're talking about the average faggot here

>hurr durr information and transparency is dangerous

>>shoots you and kills you
No, they don't. Statistically, you're more likely to get shot by a cop than a legal gun owner.

Just because they potentially make profit doesn't magically make the labor or resources free jackass. Somewhere someone has to pay to keep your leeching ass alive.

you can get it from non degenerate transmissions so no argument but i was triggered

>observo-drone starts humming
>"Oh, it's one of dem jews! Give him the expensive treatment"
observo-drone saves the day again

>Exterminate HIV positives
>There's no more HIV

You'd have to kill all monkeys too since africans would just create another hiv epidemic from them.

Well you know I pay 2% tax to goverment and added to other mandatory fees(pension, insurance etc) and voluntary union-fee the total tax is ~11% off from my paycheck. It's all good and I don't complain about taxes especially when I and everybody else get 100% cover for healthcare, medicine, unemployment, free-university(lol they actually pay to study) and housing. It's all good and can't complain

Attached: benis.png (500x363, 19K)

Maybe just kill them?

>you'll turn HIV infected people into outcasts over the near fuckall risk they pose to public health
The keyword is "near". An infectious disease is an infectious disease and as a result it's a potential risk that affects more than just yourself.
You want to play mr compassionate sympathy for the aids victims but disregard the majority of people, the uninfected.

This. I've never been diagnosed with anything my whole life so my social/employment value would get a free rise if they did this. :)

That would be barbaric, better exterminate Afrikans

fair enough. still, saying you don't have to worry about it is wrong at least from my perspective. if you already have it then maybe not, i don't know. you shouldn't spread that shit, though.

the problem here is that the governament was been able to identify the guy who leaked this precious information. and they gonna punish him for doing justice. had him hid better his data online he may be able to avoid being caught

You do realize when talking about profit the labour costs are deducted from there and the profit part is €€€€€ to goverments pockets which is then used to fund things to benefit population for example to the public healthcare. As it should be. Then again it could be used to lover to taxes (as it been done too) but there is no need for that because taxes are pretty low anyways

Attached: zizek.jpg (700x393, 191K)

They should hand over the data to NEETs.

its not an excuse.
the money you will spend on medice is a damage to you.
also there is the ones who dont do medications and you should be able to take preventive action anyway. so you dont take any risks

This. I need to know who not to fuck and which houses not to rob

Lobbyists you fucking morons.

Nah, we're talking grass root republicans like Ben Garrison.

to not agree with something right to be done just because there is more right to be done is stupid

not sure if stupid or trolling

no matter you should not have to spend money on medice. all these guys approving of spreading aids must bell all infected and are trying to spread their disease.
misery loves company

Risk of violence you retard.

Nobody is going to to target voters, but gun owner registry might sent a leftiy lynch mob totheir door step or the hypothetical tyrannical would easily confiscate the weapons.

The whole reason gun are a thing is to ensure the people can easily overthrow any government they are unhappy about, government is supposed to be weaker that the people/

>Nobody is going to to target voters
Hardline conservatives are already calling 90,000 democrat voters "fraudulent voters", so yes they really are. It really makes you wonder how they gathered those numbers: anonymous voting is a pillar in any modern democracy. The American obsession with gun ownership is blown out of all proportions, more successful democracies have avoided tyranny and dictatorship without arming toddlers to their ungrown teeth.

>The whole reason gun are a thing is to ensure the people can easily overthrow any government
No it's not. The mandatory armed service is for that so population actually know how to organize to take down diciplined armed forces if neccesary. Also public known military weapon caches. You do fucking realize that your ar-15 will not do shit when faced against military machine which includes tanks, planes and whole set of toys which you probably newer heard of let alone know how to use.

>people are more likely to attack me if they know that I have a gun
What kind of retard argument is this? Isn't the whole point of open carry laws to prevent violence?

Are you retarded?
There are many ways to fake votes and voter registration is a way to find out and control the fraud.
The voting system needs to be entirely transparent and controllable so in the end you were sure that every vote is from a real person, not a dead person's vote, not from somebody who voted in 10 different states.
>It really makes you wonder how they gathered those numbers
They checked who voted where and found 90000 votes cast by dead people or samefags? THATS THE POINT OF HAVING A WAY TO CHECK

>know how to organize to take down diciplined armed forces if neccesary.
The best case scenario is that the military will shoot up the government themselves without citizens getting involved. It's not a strategy game, the military are PEOPLE and they can just say "No sir, fuck you sir" and shoot the commander.
The worst case scenario is that the military will split in two fractions and fight itself.

>Also public known military weapon caches.
Will be the first thing seized by the secret police.
Also the militia have artillery and tanks
>nd whole set of toys which you probably newer heard of let alone know how to use.

You do understand that the burger army is just one million people, a population of a small town, while the population of wntire burgerland is 500 millions people.
They probably dont even have a million of raptor missiles fo dronestrike everyone.

In fact there are only 300 predator drones, 300 that's it.

They kept track of which names voted for which party. If you think this is okay, then I suggest moving to communist China or some other dictator hellhole.

They keep that in every voting system everywhere because you need to have a way to check.

>Have an anonymous voting system
>your vote is stolen
>entire election is a fraud
>and there's no way for you to ever know about it

There's a reason voting is never anonymous.
You cant trust that guy who counts the votes.

>you need to register what party you voted in case you voted for the (((wrong))) party
No, you don't. Double envelopes, you fucking nigger.

It's funny how the US voting system appears to be fundamentally broken and literally millions of false votes, while literally all western European countries manage to do it without any significant voter fraud. You seriously need to overhaul your voting system.