This kills the GNUtard

>not compiling linux with clang using tcsh,libreboot, and building everything else on top of the mit licensed .net core

Attached: 50745266_1109242589236268_1445318346928029696_n.jpg (841x623, 60K)

WTF, dont try to steal my idea bitch!!!!

>gnu programs have specific code written for GCC only
fucking really

I'd just like to interject for a moment, this is in fact LLVM/Clang/Linux/musl/busybox or as I've recently taken to call it LLVM/Clang+Linux+musl+busybox

Please say, out loud, what the G in GPL stands for.

Attached: general.jpg (2400x3000, 2.51M)

Girugamesh

>gnu isn't commie viru-

GNU software means a package from the GNU project.
gnu.org/software/software.html

everything in busybox is just slimmed down version of code that rms wrote

Do you have a single fact to back that up?

Everything in the GNU coreutils is just a bloated version of code that was written at AT&T and Berkeley.

>used nowhere
ok kid

>>used nowhere
Pretty much every embedded Linux device ships with busybox.
It's probably more deployed than the garbage GNU coreutils.

>It's probably more deployed than the garbage GNU coreutils.
another tool parroting what he read over at suckless

is musl even use somewhere?

Alpine linux

Seething GNUcuck

G stands for Good goy

Touched a nerve didn't I

Nice projection.
Busybox is more deployed than the bloated GNU shitutils. Deal with it.

>use musl
>try to use software
iT dOeSnT wOrK
>inb4 realize no application actually supports musl
>go back to glibc

Do you have a single fact to back that up?

that's a real funny way of spelling "distro nobody uses"

Any example of software not working with musl?
There's still uclibc, dietlibc, newlib, etc...

Untrue. Even the shell is different (almquist shell instead of bourne again shell)

dotnet core
firefox
steam
all nonfree games

>inb4 hE uSeS M$ SoFtWaRe
I actually like C#, it's usable on linux

>inb4 fIrEfOx bLoAt
firefox is pretty usable, it's better than chromium based ones.

>inb4 He UseS NoNfRee sOfTwArE
yes, I like gaming at times and see games as an art, so I don't mind them being nonfree.

>Some programs (mostly graphical applications) will work incorrectly, or segfault when run under musl. This may be due to programs expecting some glibc-specific behavior.
wiki.voidlinux.org/Musl

>not our bug
just like systemd

that's barely used, even in Docker

user shilled busybox in embedded Linux. Is Musl commonly used in embedded Linux as well? I have not yet seen it in practice anywhere.

>Is Musl commonly used in embedded Linux as well?
No. You sometimes see uclibc, but most of the time glibc is used. Even on relatively small devices the glibc bloat is acceptable.

how easy is this to do on gentoo?

Why doesn't any KDE component KDEizes Linux?

>OpenBSD made OpenSSH
cringe

no but you are using OpenBSD product
fucking idiot

>having the Sony logo doesn't make it belong to sony!

No, that KEEPS the GNU tard alive.
All the sucksmore and cucklicense faggots will finally piss off and we can be in peace again :^)

I never said I wasn't you fucking mongoloid. Using an OpenBSD product doesn't "OpenBSD"ize my system.

>In 1999, some OpenBSD developers set to the task of freeing SSH, cleaning up the license mess, and maintaining the codebase towards the future.

Attached: 1547056111204.jpg (812x1024, 61K)

How does choosing the GPL equates being branded GNU?
If I release a program under the MIT license that doesn't mean it belongs to the MIT.

stop using windows/OpenBSD systems kiddo

the only thing which keeps me from switching is ms office. i use libre right now but it keeps pissing me off.

can you build everything with musl? didnt work the last time i tried it

Some things require patches. Check the Alpine package list pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages

ok retard.

SEETHING

Because KDE devs are not autists like stallman.

just how much work would it be to port the libc of any BSD to linux?

>obvious /v/irgin quote
we're overrun with retarded /v/irgins who ironically idolize RMS

i hate this fucking board

So you have none? Here's a friendly advice, think before you make wild claims you can't substantiate.

Musl libc is a complete joke. Unstable, unreliable and slower implementation. If you want to be a hipster go use a shitBSD.
Good luck with hardware support.

>tcsh
That's a name I haven't heared in years

KNU Linux

I use GNU coreutils just about every day.

>So no bash, emacs, gnome, gzip allowed.
Good.

No he doesn't. It's another seething musl luddite.