Will Google knowingly put their customers' lives in danger for ad revenue?

Will Google knowingly put their customers' lives in danger for ad revenue?

Attached: waymo.png (595x768, 280K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tesla.com/it_IT/blog/Tesla-model-s-achieves-best-safety-rating-any-car-ever-tested
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

bump

absolutely

undoubtedly

Yes because few deaths doesn't decrease profits too much. If you are at risk to die, then you are probably worthless to Google anyway.

Yes, but not out of malice or even greed, but due to a complete lack of understanding that an error could lead to injury or death. This is why I hate the term "software engineer". Actual engineers have this stuff drilled into them in university, but a programming degree doesn't care. The idea of failing safe is completely foreign, because safe and unsafe are completely divorced from the physical world in their minds. Teslas for example are hugely unsafe compared to other cars in their class. And teslas have been basically designed by software devs since Memelon Musk bought the company.

is this even a question?

Not if we kill them first. If it is possible to reactivate an old artillery gun, we could hitch it to a truck, drive to San Francisco, and start shelling the ever loving fuck out of their headquarters.

>Vehicle that automatically navigates through cities with populations of multiple millions, with thousands of points of failure
>Doesn't need a way to communicate with world around it
You are an incredibly unintelligent person.

Attached: 1547653794639.jpg (161x161, 18K)

What's a connected car gonna do? Google search for neighboring cars?

i have android and all google apps bring it on.

In a matter of speaking, yes.

If they're not locally autonomous, they have no fucking business on the road.

i agree that we arent taught to make sure all of our programs fail predictably and safely
what if we learn ourselves to engineer software properly? can we be called software engineers?

This

I always thought if all cars were able to communicate with one another within say, a mile or so that it'd be great for crash statistics.

The (((auto insurance))) companies will cry some delicious tears, as well.

The sooner an open standard is adopted specifically for this purpose the sooner we can all have self driving cars, which then becomes flying cars and skyways. Simple as.

did you know that you can have separate internet component and critical component like self driving?
this step is good one if we want to further develop cars and technology.

"smart" cars are inevitable

Cars have horns

anything for money

/Thread

This

Not on its own. You need a governing body to uphold standards and to be certified by that body. Moreover you must be accountable for failures in your software. Those are minimum conditions.

You can use that magical thing called sensors for that. You don't need fucking tcp/ip and wifi.

>Teslas for example are hugely unsafe compared to other cars in their class
Tesla model s was almost literally the safest car of all time.

tesla.com/it_IT/blog/Tesla-model-s-achieves-best-safety-rating-any-car-ever-tested

5 star safety in every category and subcategory without exception.

Lol, little musky. Just lol.

>not due to malice
I don't believe that. These companies are huge and if they have a company structure that ignores or discourages coming with this kind of critique it should be regarded as malicious.
You're malicious if you intentionally ignore facts presented to you to further yourself in contrast to a moral high ground.
>tesla
Far more reasonable. Yet still malicious. There's less to ignore. With cars they don't normally blow up when they're from other companies.
IoT is notoriously unsafe.

>model S has good safety ratings
for the absurd price they sell those for, it'd damn well better be safe

Bravo Billy! And the cow goes...?

Moooooo.

Meow!

Attached: 49425060_p0.png (760x920, 657K)

Yeah I also though that a teamspeack for cars would be nice.

This so god damn much. You fucking software babies have no idea what real standards look like, what safe actually means. Your paradigms and language """standards""" are laughable.

Do you think it's really possible when the car is basically one big computer? Modern software developers will go bankrupt if you stop them from being able to push updates any moment they want without physical access to the car. There's barely anyone left in the industry who has any idea how to properly get the software out of beta test (that they call "release" now) without years of live testing.

what is it with these tl;dr memes

It's the company's fault, if a software developer dares raise concerns about safety they get promptly fired for not being efficient or not believing in the vision.

>connection dips for a second
>swerve into traffic and eat shit