Nvidia offering 2016 performance for 2019 pricing

>nvidia offering 2016 performance for 2019 pricing
>amd still making housefires that struggle to compete with 3 year old nvidia cards

Time to pray to our Intel overlords for salvation

Attached: Intel-Graphics-Card-Xeon-Phi-Mockup.jpg?resize=678%2C381&ssl=1.jpg (678x381, 40K)

Or just stop playing AAA/MOBA trashs

>user still making 2016 income in 2019

>muh 4k ultra 60fps on horrendously unoptimized pubg trash

Battle royal*

>Intel overlords
O yeah, baby, the salvation is nigh.

Attached: .jpg (704x396, 42K)

Consider that amd igpu are better than intels despite being shitty
If Intel would release a gpu it would be worse than radeons

You can't beat CUDA.
BASED Huang will bury both intel and ayymd.

Unironically Intel can make quite good iGPUs.
Iris 6200 for example. In 2015 it had the performance of current Vega6/Vega8.
There's just no point of competing with AMD in APU segment. Most people that are buying APU and using it for 3D are just trying to save some cash. And obviously Intel isn't good at saving peoples cash.
So they're just stuck with 2013-level performance of their iGPUs. Because it just werks, there's really no point of increasing price by making them better and it's 100% fine for office usage.

>intel
>price/performance
Pick one.

>Intel
>GPU performance
>Our savior
We're fucked

G4560 :)

>we may have amd cpu + intel gpu rigs soon enough

Attached: 1470989003578.jpg (638x476, 53K)

>AMD fail to deliver for the next decade
>everyone hails GTX 1080ti as the next king of GPU
>decade of stagnation occurs in GPU
>nvidia's next series of GPU offers 5-10% improvement each increment to top end and prices increase 20-30%

The Pentium line is actually pretty low multicore value, it gets destroyed by Ryzen 3 in that regard
The only advantage is being as cheap as physically possible to sell for

>it gets destroyed by Ryzen 3
Hahaha no.
And Ryzen 3 gets destroyed by i3-8100

They're near identical, and the 8100 costs $20 more, which is a lot when you have a price tag in the lower 90s on Ryzen 3
Not to mention poor integrated graphics and no overclocking support on the Intel side

>better integrated graphics
Niche market at best. You will need a dedicated graphic card anyway unless you like to play at 720p low setting.

Sure it's niche, but it's also value added and there is no big downside (except PCIe cost but most likely that isn't a big deal). Still cheaper, so even if you don't want that you aren't set back.
For older games and emulation the Vega can work fine, or to hold off on a video card purchase if one of yours dies it will at least run games unlike Intel where sometimes it's never playable

>For older games and emulation
>AMD
Pick one. Older games and emulations always prefer Intel.

>emulation
>GPU

Don't forget that Kaby Lake & Coffee Lake microarchitecture adds full fixed-function H.265/HEVC Main10/10-bit encoding and decoding acceleration & full fixed-function VP9 8-bit & 10-bit decoding acceleration & 8-bit encoding acceleration.
And Video Coding Engine is shit.