DOS

If Jow Forums is so worried about bloat, and also backdoors, why not just use the OS which as source code so small you could peruse it in an afternoon?

Attached: 36456.jpg (720x400, 85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wiki.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS
ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/pkg-html/group-net.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>what is modern hardware

Nigger, give me a way to shitpost on Jow Forums with it and I would!

5.25 inch
typical asian

t. zoomer

CP/M also good

Attached: CPM_CLUB9.png (1066x554, 26K)

>3.5" floppies
We need to bring these back just because of how fucking cool it felt using them

Attached: face.png (680x497, 121K)

>*ker-CHNK*
>*enen-en*
>*enen-en*

Why when better alternatives like Haiku and AmigaOS exist?

Haiku is several hundred MB. Amiga may be a contender to OP's point.

5 1/2" floppies are better
fite me

FreeDOS is the only acceptable DOS

>broken 386 enhanced support on Windows 3.1
the absolute state of freetards

batch scripting is fucking comfy

Are you fucking stupid?

The Arachne web browser for DOS
...BUT... i don't know if Jow Forums recognizes it as an accepted browser. Someone on Jow Forums once posted that they posted using Netscape, and were banned for using a browser not recognized.

why?

>what is FreeDOS
Besides that, you can install MS-DOS just fine on modern hardware.

>you can install DOS on modern hardware

no you cant

but there is a lot of point in making a modern DOS (FreeDOS isnt it)

somebody should make a DOS which supports:
multiple CPUs so if a software can utilize multiplel CPU or cores, it has possibility to do so

CPU power states: you can adjust a runlevel into different state depending on the CPU speed you need, obviously it shoulndt require 100% of CPU core all the time

support for more than a few megabytes of memory (memory mapping scheme from a few megabytes up to several gigabytes)

support for large hard drives

NO SUPPORT FOR LEGACY DOS SOFTWARE (why would you need it anyway, supporting it would mean you need to make FreeDOS once again)

I think, I don't know, but
wiki.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS
Then install a browser
ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.2/repos/pkg-html/group-net.html
is where I would start. Probably a custom 4channel app after that.
Definitely test in a vm.

Im not worried about bloat
Alll i need is muh debian and muh suckless tools you nigger cock sucking inbred faggot

There's a difference between "not bloated" and "without functions, practically useless".
DOS and suckless fit in the latter.

There is without functions, practically useless and KDE.

Suckless fit in the latter

>no you cant
Yes you can. In fact, I've done so. At one point I had split my hard drive up into three partitions: DOS on the first one, then Windows 8.1 on the second, and then Linux on the third.
There is, literally nothing, stopping you from installing it on your system right now.