Is there no hope for a mutt

mutts have the option to begin with, can you say the same, stinky shitholer?

>#yuropoorjealousy

I can actually believe the state of burgers like how do you guys even with yourself getting taken over by the jew and just accepting it like it's fine you get fed constant brainwashing media constant interracial porno/music and then if you want to even get a decent internet you have to pay literally 5 times more than my country and also you have loads of niggers

Lmao

Attached: Screenshot_20190213_203806.jpg (1080x1083, 181K)

>monopoly in my area is Cox

>up to 2gbps
Literally only possible if you live inside the local exchange. Dont believe their lies user.

Based

>up to
>300 dollarydoos

fucking hell

The service is only offered if you live within about 1/3rd of a mile of one of their fiber boxes. Then further they'll spend up to ~$15,000 on installation. They provide a Juniper ACX 2100 switch that hands off an SFP+ at ~2.2gbps both up and down. And a 1gbps Ethernet handoff. Both the SFP+ drop and the ethernet drops are assigned static IP addresses that can be used simultaneously.

The provided router has an SFP+ port, and 1gbps ethernet LAN ports.

If you want to use 2gbps on a client device, you need to provide your own router, either pro grade or PFsense box or similar.

There are plenty of speedtests floating around online of this service hitting full ~2.1gbps in both directions.

I don't even think I'd want IPv6 since it seems like it's a step back for internet privacy. Correct me if I'm wrong

Why is the UK waaaaayyy down at 33?

Attached: 2019-02-13 15_45_37.png (354x2144, 68K)

>you have to pay literally 5 times more
But we can save hundreds of bucks when building computers *dabs*

You're mostly wrong.

its basically just an ip address but theres more of them so you dont have to share and have it change periodically

rural is probably worse and densely populated areas better than the US, so the average isn't meaningful

How is the average not meaningful?

Not to mention, gigabit is a available to far more Americans by sheer number than people in the UK, even those in densely populated cities.

Sure we pay more, but we also have a LOT more infrastructure to build.

Extreme rural areas and many many tiny islands. Also unfortunately we have a tumour called Northern Ireland. Average is a poor measure.

>to far more Americans by sheer number
What about per capita

18 euros a month for 100Mbps here..

Go CenturyLink for 1 Gbps for $65/m.

Moved from the US to the UK.
Oh my god, the internet service and cell service here is cancer. Literally EVERYTHING is some form of DSL, with most places unable to get above 60 Mbps unless you are lucky and live in one of the areas that Virgin media has rolled out fiber.

Cell service isn't any better. The plans give much more data than the US, but the coverage is balls. No coverage in buildings, drops to fucking 3G all over the place, and lol good luck getting more than 2 bars in the "rural" areas here (which are all just like 3 or 4 miles from a town).

So yes, burgers do pay more for internet and cell service but we get a much better product. Also the disposable income of a burger is higher than that of yuros.

>2Gbps
In what scenario can you actually use that?

mainly because of lot of people are just old bastards who have normal DSL and they don't want to pay any more than like... Actually my dad I think is on DSL for 12 a month and is fine for what he does.

Also we have unlimited data 4G packages so a lot of people are quite happy with like 30-50Mbps and don't really need better.

I have never experienced anything like this and I've lived in the UK my whole life

Also depends what network your with desu

Also Virgin it's just a meme it slows down to a reported 10mbps during evening times when you have a fucking 500 mbps service lmao

I pay $80/month for 1Gb

Then why is your mobile data average lower as well?

Not that the US is particularly high on the list here either, but it's still better than the UK.

Attached: 2019-02-13 16.14.35.jpg (1080x8629, 701K)

The only real difference is no NAT, which was the intended way to do IPv4 anyway, even then IPv6 NAT should be totally possible.

there is no way this is accurate or not skewed
give me the median desu

I've been with Three, EE, and Vodafone. Some a better in certain areas than others, but overall I cannot count on having a decent signal unless I am right in a town or on a main motorway.
If you ever visit the US, get a Verizon SIM and you'll see what I mean. Literally everywhere you go will have 4G signal, no matter if you're on an interstate 70 miles from the nearest civilization.

I know people that legit cannot get more than 1 Mbps at their home because there's 4km of copper between them and the exchange.

The UK still uses 3G (HSPA+) in a lot of places, and busy 4G places are congested. At work, Vodafone and Three can barely get above 2 Mbps.

Averages are only good for normally distributed populations. Otherwise it's a rather meaningless stat, just like how GDP has no bearing on what most people are worth/own. Shock-horror, broadband speed isn't normally distributed. Learn a single fucking thing about statistics before commenting brainlet.

>Shit.net

When I do a speedtest in a my phone I only get 25 down but when I actually download something I'm getting almost 100 so I'm not sure what's going on there

I lived in fort Collins in Colorado and I had a Verizon SIM card and I got nothing more than 12-15 Mbps with patchy signal what I stayed and I lived right inside the town it wasn't like I was out in the country

Absolute meh tier service with Verizon in my experience.

ungrateful bitch

it costs 9,99€ in here for 100 mbs

you're not wrong but you're also not completely right

It's even worse in Canada

150Mbps for $120 per month

5GB cellular data is $80 per month

AUSTRALIA #6
AUSTRALIA STRONK.

You act like that means anything when your average annual income is 1/10th that of the U.S.

>he doesn't disable ipv6 on all devices

Attached: 1549857907828.jpg (648x484, 58K)

You're right. More IP addresses = more computers have unique IPs because no need to share them = easier to track

Toronto here. What dark corner of this country are you living in? Bell 1Gb fiber up and down. $100/month

If he lives in a major coastal metropolitan area, sure.

move somewhere relevant and use hyperoptic