What's the most interesting thing you've researched?

>Research flat Earth.
>Sounds stupid til you actually do.
>Once you go flat, you never go back.
>Disclaimer: Jesus and God are not real.


>atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html

>youtube.com/watch?v=-Ax_YpQsy88

Attached: REEEEEEEEE.jpg (474x608, 58K)

Attached: flat earth 40.jpg (564x614, 51K)

>Real flat Earth facts:
>Understand that most information on the net about flat Earth, and most flat Earth sites ARE fake news meant to push you away from the factual pieces of evidence.
>Understand that Earth is level, and has zero to do with a god or a jesus, or so on.
>Realize that the government agencies across the world are in overdrive, shills are trying to stop this movement.
>The following is a list of truths. If anything deviates from this list, you can bet your ass you're getting your information from a shill.

1. Nobody BELIEVES a dome REALLY exists. It's a myth, a theory. Nobody has been able to go to test it, so that's ruled out and finalized.

2. All we know is you can't have a negative pressure system (space) alongside a positive system (Earth) without some kind of barrier. This is real science. Tested daily. Tards claim a dome must be this barrier. (Atmosphere is not the barrier).

3. There is no accurate FE map out there, some come close but all are ultimately bogus. No REAL flat Earther will claim a map is correct unless he is stupid, or new to the movement.

4. There may or may NOT be an icewall surrounding Earth 360 degrees as pictures depict. Wall may open at some point, may not. No trustable maps exist.

5. Flat Earth is NOT a disc located in space spinning around and flying upwards at 6mph.

6. Space is not 'stars and planets', it is much deeper than that. Think sonoluminesence, sound creates light, star in a jar, etc. Google it. (GOogle is a CIA front).

7. The ONLY legit flat Earth forum is HTTP://IFERS.INFO .

8. The flat Earth society is a mock group, not real, do not visit, their info is bogus. Government shills. IFERS is not the FES.

9. NASA or affiliated agencies have never been to space. Physics demonstrates to us the highest any 'rocket' can go is 100mi.

10. Do your own research.

Attached: You see it.jpg (490x427, 30K)

>NASA have never been to space.
>NASA launch sideways into restricted waters where the rockets are recovered and faked as successful.
>NASA shows cartoons as proof.
Cartoons are not proof of reality.

Attached: NASA sideways to space.png (752x768, 447K)

>Real planets.
NASA cartoons are not real.

Attached: sat1.jpg (522x522, 41K)

Attached: main-qimg-3d76075472afe85120c63d9233b50a59-c.jpg (602x339, 37K)

>The sun is not a star.
>Stars are not suns.

Attached: real stars.jpg (564x564, 44K)

>No real images of satellites exist. The only place you'll see a satellite is in a museum, or in a cartoon image from NASA affiliated agencies.

>Point a scope in the sky tracked with some NASA satellite site , and see a flash of light - that's all. Not a satellite. Could be anything. Be critical. Just coz they say it's a satellite, doesn't mean it is.


Before satellites existed, people saw lights in the sky moving. Ask your grandparents what them lights were before 1959 when satellites first were invented.

Them lights whizzing around at night are not satellites. Satellites do not exist.

Everything is done by ground based repeater towers and high altitude balloons and craft.

Attached: satellite-bs.jpg (978x596, 201K)

>The stars move above.
>Earth is stationary.
>Timelapse over even a short period would show a moving Earth, instead it proves a motionless Earth.

Attached: polaris-2-15-2013-Ken-Christison-NC-sq-e1495561020753.jpg (800x800, 129K)

>The wall surrounding Earth which keeps the waters in.

Attached: ends-of-the-earth.jpg (951x592, 94K)

Attached: waa.jpg (1024x768, 185K)

>Model of what could be over the wall...

Attached: Alt.jpg (572x403, 55K)

Attached: Internet+melts+your+brain+flat+earth+belief+faq+can+you+fall_01d068_5842354.jpg (900x675, 105K)

>mexican sugar dancing
>second hand smoke isn't real
>hindu milk miracle

>hindu milk miracle
lol.

Attached: ultimate ignorance.jpg (666x500, 42K)

ok retard

Attached: POTATO.jpg (477x427, 42K)

Research Bigger Luke

Attached: Bigger Luke Logo [B-W] 350x350.png (350x350, 29K)

Assuming that Hitler started gassing Jews since day 1, that makes for 3,153,600 minutes.

6,000,000 Jews killed during 3,153,600 minutes comes out to 1.9 Jews per minute. That means Hitler killed roughly 1 Jew every 30 seconds. (LOL)

In Auschwitz, the most famous and biggest concentration camp, there are 15 crematoriums. According to Auschwitz survivors, Jews would go into the chamber, gassed for 15-20 minutes, then put into the oven.

It takes 1 hour to cremate a body using modern furnaces which operate at much higher temperatures than the traditional ovens at the camp. However, lets say that the ovens were operating at a level that we see today, that means it would take 1 hour, 20 minutes to gas and burn 15 Jews assuming they were all burned simultaneously. (Disregarding the time it would take for the gas to empty the chamber for the bodies to be transported from the chamber to the oven.) The elevators used to transport bodies were very slow and could only take up 7 bodies at a time with their weight capacity. However, for our greatest ally, we're going to assume that bodies were teleported instantly from chamber to oven.

That means 15 Jews were gassed and burned every 1.2 hours. That comes out to exactly 300 Jews every 24 hours (Assuming the gassing and burning of Jews was happening every hour straight for 6 years on an uninterrupted basis) the total number of jews killed would be 657,000 for those 6 years. The official Jewish story is that 4,000,000 Jews were killed at Auschwitz alone.

How can any Jew, Israeli, or Shill ever even argue this story when just simple math is enough to destroy the whole argument? Can any Jews respond to this?

>plane

You should do one of these with flat earth veganism AND that orher third thing you did that I forgot about

>Can any Jews respond to this?
i'm not Jewish but sure
your estimate is fairly close to the early estimates .Just from reading the Wikipedia article for Auschwitz it cites 3 separate estimations.
>French chemist and author Jean-Claude Pressac estimates that between 631,000 and 711,000 were killed at Auschwitz, of whom 470,000 to 550,000 were gassed
>Gerald Reitlinger's 1953 book The Final Solution estimated the number killed to be 800,000 to 900,000,[181] and Raul Hilberg's 1961 work The Destruction of the European Jews estimated the number killed to be a maximum of 1,000,000 Jewish victims
Later historians used the German data on train transit and deportations to come to a figure of 1.1 million in Auschwitz. which is consistent with the testimonies of Nazi war criminals. The other deaths were caused by starvation , forced labor, infectious diseases , individual executions , and other medical experiments. the left over bodies (not cremated) were buried in mass graves or burned in the open fire.
>The official Jewish story is that 4,000,000 Jews were killed at Auschwitz alone
This figure only came from the soviet union , and is regarded as untrue propaganda by most historians.\

just for some more context.
the around 2 million of the other 4.9 million jews that died in the holocaust were killed on the spot by German death squads (they never went to camps). the last 2.9 million were killed in the other 67 natzi operated concentration camps

i dont think plastic and water reflect things in the same manner

The curve was also much more pronounced in that image then it is on Earth

You should try to hijack it ahmed

this thread

I'm amazed that people can "do research", and the come back with claims like "All we know is you can't have a negative pressure system (space) alongside a positive system (Earth) without some kind of barrier.".
What kind "research" produces that type of crap? Even a basic skim through Wikipedia's articles on pressure and Newton's laws of motion would give a rough idea of how an atmosphere works, let alone actually reading a book on physics. Do they just look for stuff on youtube that confirms their views, and never bother tying to understand how things actually work?

Attached: 86518a14eb39f3e57560c0b71d3e3696.jpg (1134x1577, 1.27M)