I'm about to make the switch which one should i choose?

This.
That piece of spyware STILL doesn't have a competitor in case of performance, unfortunately.

the one with an inbuilt scheduler

oh wait

qbit. deluge seems to struggle when you have 1000+ torrents

Only on windows :^)

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com.jpg (256x256, 7K)

Qbit used too much memory and stalled a lot for me.
Deluge has a less friendly layout, but works better with my system over all.

I always confuse qbittorrent and qutebrowser logos so I have to open thread to see which one it it this time. It was the less interesting one it seems. Transmission is fine for this task already.

what are you doing with 1k torrents animal

BiglyBT on the desktop, transmission on headless.

anime, hentai and anime music

I've read rtorrent and transmission performs better than utorrent by people who seed thousands of torrents

>1000+ torrents
what the actual fuck

>seeding
HAHAHAHAHAHAH

t. public tracker plebs

I'm pretty sure I'm doing something wrong and stupid but here goes. For some reason qBittorrent doesn't connect to peers and start the download until I start another torrent client like uTorrent. What's going on and how can I fix it?

I don't get it.

What cutting edge torrent features is it missing?

He probably thinks only cucks seed torrents.

I personally can't imagine being proud of being a cunt, but hey, thats how it is.

My country has poor internet policies and it's my coping mechanism.

qbit is clearly superior in features AND in most important aspect: stability

I hope you like infected binaries

Old news. That happened in 2016, it's like saying gentoo git is still infected, or Mint website is hacked until this day. Fucking retard.

transmissionbt.com/keydnap_qa/

if you're not a power-downloader and willing to put up with a few minor bugs, picotorrent is pretty awesome

Attached: screenshot1.png (502x379, 13K)

you can try both and formulate your own opinion, faggot.
that being said, i prefer qbittorrent. it just werks.