DLSS is a complete sham

youtube.com/watch?v=3DOGA2_GETQ
>4K DLSS is worse than 1440p native in performance and visuals
Nvidia btfo

Attached: 1546983099180.jpg (503x503, 80K)

Other urls found in this thread:

myinstants.com/instant/the-simpsons-nelsons-ha-ha/
topazlabs.com/ai-gigapixel/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I don't get these stupid gimmicks. what's wrong with plain old supersampling?

Damn Really Shitty Sampling
>muh neural network

You cant jew people with plan old supersampling

Attached: 1544248650145.png (1111x597, 573K)

>upscale so shitty that even on a screenshot of jewtube video @ 480p shows it
this is what nvidiots who bought this crap deserve.
you were well warned that this sort of upscale shit was already being used for years on consoles and no one wants it.
suck it!

Attached: upscale scam.png (853x480, 890K)

JeremyClarksonRubbingVaselineOnCamera.webm

>VIDEO GAMES

Attached: excited soyboy.gif (365x400, 551K)

It's the same as running the game at 4k. DLSS was supposed to be a smaller performance hit than TAA

I can tell the difference on a fucking phone screen, I can't even imagine what it's like on a large monitor

Attached: Screenshot_2019-02-18-08-07-32-860_com.google.android.youtube.png (1920x1080, 3.2M)

Attached: DtTnfFH2Hjc.webm (640x360, 424K)

DLSS is just like existing meme upscaler like nnedi3 or ngu used in video players mpv and mpc-hc/madvr. Shitty oil painting filter

It's actually worse, nnedi3 and ngu can be used on any video of any resolution or aspect ratio while DLSS has to be trained for each game individually and requires you to be running it at a specific resolution.

Attached: 1541624494584.jpg (1110x515, 104K)

this is a clusterfuck I didn't even know about DLSS before the driver update. Why even bother.

> do upscaling, i.e., sub-sampling
> call it Deep Learning Super Sampling
what did they mean by this?

Attached: 1490957728451.png (1280x1024, 865K)

Bump because FUCK NVIDIA!

myinstants.com/instant/the-simpsons-nelsons-ha-ha/

Attached: nelson.jpg (233x217, 9K)

>5 months after launch
>dlss is a scam
>rtx is a scam
>same performance as last gen for higher price

absolute STATE of the morons who actually bought these cards

Attached: 1456857107001.jpg (300x300, 25K)

>Get better image quality for the same FPS with lower resolution/settings than with DLSS enabled.
>'BUT NVIDIA!'

Attached: robocop_3.jpg (620x331, 79K)

>16 minute video
>3 minutes of actual info
What did he mean by this?

It is conceivable that on 7nm cards RTX will not be a complete joke if enough extra compute is thrown at the problem, but the current gen's implementation will age worse than milk if that happens.

>supersampling

Nothing. Exploring new technologies lead to eventual benefits though. DLSS is garbage now, ray tracing might been seen as laughable in the face of compute reduction and lower FPS, but it's new tech. I'm actually super impressed with Metro's ray tracing. DLSS in the current state not so much.
Hope AMD joins in. If both companies are smart, they'd make basic cards without the tech for people that want just raw FPS and the new RTX type cards.

Too bad they can't dlss upscale their stocks

They're trying to do this topazlabs.com/ai-gigapixel/

The goal is so supersample with way less overhead.

>4K
>1685p
>1920 x 1080 jaypeg

If you can't tell the difference even in that picture you need glasses

the fact that it's so easily noticeable even at 1080p just shows how fucking awful it must be at 4k

DLSS = Doesn't Look So Sharp

>this low res of an image
shit thread, kys

>dlss objectively worse, even on a 480p image
>completely missing the point
>damage controling this hard
hi jensen, no money left to pay for a "multimedia marketing team"? hahaha, you fucking cuck!