>dughhh the mun landingh is fake and gay
Save us some Time and Google retroreflectors on the moon
Stop with this stupid Theory
Liam White
Other urls found in this thread:
reuters.com
twitter.com
Joshua James
Isaiah Moore
um no sweaty, the moon landing was fake.
Aaron Edwards
there is legitimately a truck load of high quality evidence suggesting that the moon landing may have been faked
theres alllloooootttt of stuff that is really hard to explain away
Henry Lopez
Russia verified the moon landing in 1969
Just lėtai the burger have this victory
Easton Thomas
*Let
Josiah Brooks
Interesting, please explain
Adrian Ramirez
What victory? we were the first in space, the first to send artifical sputnik ,the first human in space, the first object send to space was soviet
it was only small gain for yankees
Eli Young
they could have been placed by unmaned probes
Evan Harris
Looks like a homemade wah wah pedal.
Joseph Stewart
reuters.com
"oopsie, we lost all the originals"
"enjoy the new digitally enhanced versions"
*wink wink*
Landon Ross
They never landed. They flew past and threw these out of the window, then left.
Elijah Bell
Why,if they where already there why would they imstead of landing throw retroreflectors through the window and fake it later?
Noah Sullivan
What's the year of origin for large scale US govt scams, then? I always thought it was 2001, then I found out it could have been even as early as 1971 (fiat decision).
Now suddenly it's 1969. I just can't believe that.
Anthony Rodriguez
Simple. They never really wanted to land of course, just take some pics, but they got to close and had to lose some ballast. Damn litterbugs.
Anthony Johnson
>they got to close and had to lose some ballast.
Doesn't really work at those orbital speeds to just lose a couple of hundred of kilos. It would buy only a few seconds more time. Minus the human reaction time to counter.
Please, do the math. A basic newtonian math is quite sufficient here.
Colton Brown
A few seconds was all they needed. All calculations were already done by NASA, but they were a fraction off due to an error in the floating point unit of their abacus.
Austin Rogers
Come on. You are effectively claiming those guys did something about tenfold more amazing within the Moon's gravity field than an actual Moon landing?
Do the fucking math.
Brayden Butler
I would show you, but those abacus floating point units are a collectors item these days and cost a fortune. Besides, the OS they run on (abacus basic 2.3) has no emulator because the specs are understandably a state secret.
Gavin Davis
You know, your claims have a zero transparency.
You are exactly like some religious bigot.
Jack Morris
I mean... probably way earlier then most people think.
I'd probably start, at a bare minimum with Kennedy.
Matthew Roberts
1963? Really?
Easton Nguyen
No need to get all insulty. You told me to do the math, and I told you it was actually an error in the math that made them have to drop some ballast. If you've got better math you should show it, not just expect others to do the work for you.
I'm open to new evidence, you've just not shown any. Just a bunch of wild claims and expect me to just take your word for it. Tsk tsk.