Internet as we know it will be dead in a near future

>internet as we know it will be dead in a near future
How does it make you feel?

Attached: internet.png (630x747, 95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

quora.com/What-big-event-is-on-the-verge-of-happening/answer/Matthew-Bates-27
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>internet as we know it will be dead in a near future
That's not what this screenshot of yours says.
>How does it make you feel?
Pretty happy if all the tracking dies down and all go away for good, along with Javascript which enabled most of online data mining and exploits.

All ads*

>function in society
How about I keep on using a computer while taking precautions to protect privacy and not use shit sites like facebook and such?

>How does it make you feel?
Like I'm talking to stupid people.

I don't fucking care. Everything I type here I say in real life. Fuck your coward shilling.

where is that text from?

quora.com/What-big-event-is-on-the-verge-of-happening/answer/Matthew-Bates-27

I hope the future has gulags for people who think pic related is fine.

I understand why a lot of that would be worrying but this is a good way to think

I wouldn't give someone something in real life then get mad when someone else gets it

Once it belongs to someone else it's theirs too

Attached: Screenshot_20190225-040132~2.png (1312x153, 90K)

I think what it means is; government officials can see the pictures you're sending.

Well the original language is "that person can do with them as they please" which I agree with. Something you own is yours to give.

Normalfaggots ruined the internet.

Agreed, that paragraph is not weird at all, if you send somebody something, it's obvious they have full control over it. Nothing special about this.

>he still think its just the single sites
How many sites do you use with AWS?

You're posting here and filling out captchas so you're already part of the Google botnet.

They can also get your info from other people. If your grandma signs up for Facebook and allows access to her contacts they now have your phone number. And now that they have your phone number they can find accounts using that number. There's only so much you can do.

But of course corporations wont be held to these standards because why would they?
>Anything you transfer to someone else isn't legally private.
So if I download some software from a company, I should be able to do with it what I please because it is no longer private.

confidentiality is a thing in real life, why not online? this is an incredibly retarded attitude to have.

I'm watching you! :^)

If this was true, why do people get busted for uploading their ex gfs nudes all the time?

>19 replies
The old Jow Forums was made up of neckbeards who cared for your privacy. We would go on raids, install Gentoo and promote privacy-awareness. This new generation of Channers is just pathetic.

Internet has already died a decade ago.

say it with me:
"Uncle Ted was right!"

Attached: ted_professor.jpg (1024x802, 144K)

Time to go back to trading disks.

Whoever wrote this doesn't know about "reasonable expectation of privacy". That's an American thing for you Eurotrash.

Come sweet death

>That's an American thing for you Eurotrash.
that's why you people bought alexa devices in droves right?

Quick reminder originally internet wasn't anonymous at all, everyone had a fucking mail, phone number and occupaion under all shit they wrote. The great influx of retards made the checks impossible, but now we're catching up in tech and sure as hell can verify everyone in real time.
We're going back to how it used to be.

PRISM involves what country's government and what country's corporations?

Hardly. The culture has changed dramatically since that time. There was no problem signing your name to whatever you said when things were more accepting of fringe views. There was no mass panic over copies of the Anarchist's Cookbook floating around and porn and piracy used to be fucking everywhere.

And anonymity was always important for people on BBSs and FidoNet because they were all just Little Guys.

>Whoever wrote this doesn't know about "reasonable expectation of privacy"
and in an age where people willingly post their innermost thoughts for the entire world to see, alongside their name and sometimes even location, what is "reasonable?" Does posting on facebook, twitter, or linkedin mean your reasonable expectation of privacy is "zero?" What about using Gmail, through which you agree that google can read and use everything you send and receive?

Do you even know what "reasonable expectation of privacy" is? If someone is in a private facebook group, that is reasonable expectation to privacy. If someone sends a private message to someone, that is reasonable expectation to privacy. If someone makes a public post on a public page for anyone registered or not to read then that is not reasonable expectation to privacy.

unironically he was desu

good goy, mr. shlomo is really proud of you

Seeing what the internet has become it makes me feel like nothing of value will be lost.

Its the web, but even Tim Berners-Lee has said he's disappointed how it turned out.

le this

Attached: 1540413926033.jpg (736x460, 161K)

bump

>There was no problem signing your name to whatever you said when things were more accepting of fringe views.
No one would have accepted your DA JOOOS nazi shit then, and most importantly, you would never have written it under your name. At least don't lie to yourself. Take your friend and fuck off to

You were not required to enter your real name or phone number when getting an email adress though.

There was (is, technically) a white nationalism newgroup.

Whatever would take its place would probably have similar issues. These data miners aren't going down that easily.

professional or academic orientated stuff posted by somewhat already public figures was the outlier with credits posted under their real name but the norm was to have personal or hobby shit posted under pseudonyms, that of course didn't make you anonymous to your isp or other service providers but nobody ever claimed otherwise
what changed wasn't that technology caught up to be able to verify peoples identity but rather monopolistic sites like facebook started requiring real names while banning those under pseudonyms while google started pushing heavily to get people to use their real names for products like youtube, which was an incredibly controversial move at the time, you can't even sign up for a google account without a phone number any more for comparison
companies like google and facebook normalising entering names/addresses/phone numbers while occasionally banning people that didn't do this coupled with these companies generally being more professional and trustworthy (at least compared to a mail server hosted out of somebodies parents basement) led to people being far more blasé with their private information and ditching the pseudonyms that they thought once protected them, this isn't a return to norm but a breaking of it

if you're still doubtful just go look up the infamous 'dumb fucks' quote by zuckerberg, it was surprising to him that members of prestigious universities would put up their real information for a reason

white nationalist groups and people openly being white supremacist in countries like america where it isn't inherently illegal isn't surprising, however those groups have always had a larger member base and set of donors that wish to remain anonymous because that shit is publicly damaging to their careers outside of their home towns and this has been the case for generations now

Attached: LeeAtwaters.jpg (806x558, 122K)

ted was right

Not him but, Jow Forums pass. Also genuinely, can you post some information about AWS related to tracking? I understand that they host a large majority of the internet but they certainly aren't physically able to track what happens on secure endpoints, so I don't see how that could possibly be a security issue. The only thing I believe that you could be alluding to is that AWS tracks your IP address through their servers and makes connections based on that, which is obviously a weak graph anyway and is easily subvertible by any basic proxy.

The panopticon will be corporate rather than government.
It already is.
Why Facebook needs to know what your heartrate is or when your girlfriend is ovulating is beyond me. But you can bet there's money in it.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-02-26 at 10.07.08 am.png (463x361, 75K)

decentralize everything

HACK THE PLANET!

Uncle Ted was right!!!!

He was a loser who couldn't handle his feelings being hurt.

Why do you need freedom? You have something to hide?

Attached: 1539032538268.gif (264x264, 1.64M)

Factor analysis of scores of such data allows making accurate predictions of what you're likely to buy and when. This in turn allows to minimize marketing overheard thus increasing company profits.

>hurr the internet is going to die
>all of the points posted are either bullshit, more than half a decade old news, or can easily be averted if you aren't a completely oblivious consumer
Imagine being this retarded.