anandtech.com
USB 3.2 at 20 Gb/s Coming to High-End Desktops This Year
Andrew Bell
Jason Lopez
>I'm maxing out my gen 3.0 universal serial bus.
said no one ever
Bentley Roberts
>usb 3+
>bukkakes the everything within a 200' range with EMI, shitting up bluetooth, wifi, cordless phones, etc.
>WHat we need is more bandwidth! xD
Isaac Phillips
The main problem with USB is host-based processing, the latencies are higher than a direct interface like PCI-express or SATA.
Carson Collins
Does host based processing = cpu intensive?
Juan Adams
Great, that'll make transferring podcasts to my phone so much faster. Thanks USB, you're my greatest ally!
Caleb Johnson
cringe
Cooper Gomez
Why not call it USB 4.0???
why do they love 3 so much???
Oliver Bennett
what's the cable length limit?
0.5 meter?
Benjamin Cruz
cringe
Aiden Wilson
Yay for USB being less and less "universal"
Landon Moore
Good job not reading, faggot
Aiden Murphy
it's a improvement over the current standard but not a whole generational change
Charles Young
We'll be able to use M.2 SSDs as USB drives. Imagine.
Adrian Flores
At full speed, I mean.
Xavier Morris
*blocks your path*
Cameron Fisher
>the couple of times a month you use a USB drive might be up to a second faster (if you buy all new hardware)
What's wrong with these nibbas?
Chase Thompson
>USB 3.2 has 20Gb/s
no, it doesn't, you mongoloid brainlet.
USB 3.2 will have speeds from 5Gb/s to 20Gb/s.
Brands won't tell you which one is it to fuck normies up.
new 20Gb/s is known as "USB 3.2 Gen 2×2."
old 10Gb/s is now known as "USB 3.2 Gen 2." (previously "USB 3.1 Gen 2." and "SuperSpeed USB 10Gbps.")
old 5Gb/s is now known as "USB 3.2 Gen 1." (previously "USB 3.0", "SuperSpeed", or "USB 3.1 Gen 1.")
Leo Bennett
cringe
also check 'em
Luis Bennett
Isn't thunderbolt a closed standard?
Josiah Ward
cringe
Ryder Wood
It's as if they are specifically going out of their way to fuck with the customer