So youtube demonetizes the antivaxx videos but leaves them up?

Now, the info is still out there but there are no ads, making them easier to see.

Or, they are still ads, but youtube keeps the money?

How is this not adding to the problem? Why don't they just remove the fucking videos? God knows they remove plenty of other crap that shouldn't.

Corporate posturing by tech companies is exactly why the Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

Attached: Untitled.jpg (1600x900, 269K)

>government injections good
>government never uses mandatory injections for bad
>ur dumb, die of polio antivaxxer!

Attached: 1547489945013.png (500x517, 145K)

You're a fucking retard if you think the "anti-vax" hate isn't corporate propaganda to begin with.

They have to be VARY lean-lent on what to remove to maintain classification as a Platform. Removing videos at a certian magnitude could cross a line to be considered "editorializing." Thus, Youtube would be found a Publisher; which carries different standards and legalities Google wishes to avoid.

Demonetazsation interestingly makes it less likely to turn up in recommendations as a side effect.

If video.profit = 0 then recommend = false

not really that surprising

>arbitrary removal good
>bash the fash

Anti vaxx panic is a psy op to get people to oppose freedom to refuse injections. I'm not anti vaccination, I am pro-choice.

a post like that is exactly the kind of thing a russian propagandist would say

the antivaxxers don't need the recommendations, they go looking

>arbitrary
misconstrues entirely

Fuck off, vaxtards. My body, my choice.

Attached: 1548924737011.png (625x605, 57K)

I'll never understand why Reddit hates antivax so much

Youtube is now the morality police

That misconstrues nothing. It is arbitrary and you know it.

spreading diseases is a violation of the nap, I'll take your ass to private arbitration in chains

Attached: anball.png (547x402, 66K)

You're immune, how exactly is the NAP violated? You got your vaccine... right?

Get vaxxed, or doesn't that work? Fucking vaxtard, enjoy your autism injewctions.

I can't tell if you faggots are rping anymore

a decent percentage of people can't get vaccines due to legitimate medical reasons ranging from allergies to existing conditions and in those cases the only protection they get is in the form of herd immunity, but it doesn't matter if it's smallpox or ebola nobody wants your diseases

>you should poison your body because some weak fucks can't survive a little booboo

cull the weak

We need a /yt/ board or some social media board to coral this kind of shit and twitter screenshots

>legit anti-vaxxers and anarcho-primitivists on Jow Forums
What the fuck did 2016 do to this board man?

Attached: 1534349278089.png (890x388, 566K)

Too bad you're given like 60% of all your life time vaccines at birth in a single shot, so if you're allergic to them you're kinda fucked already.
Any of us could've been allergic and been fucked up by that and be none the wiser.

The normalfags grew up, stopped being edgy /b/igots and nowadays are on reddit or the normalfag boards. Now all that remains here is the truly autistic.

>why yes google, you should be the arbiter of what i do and do not see
you fucking retard

> Why don't they just remove the fucking videos?
I wish they did

This is is why I wholeheartedly support the anti-vax retards. It's better for all of us if they aren't vaccinated.

We took the redpill, Did you know the inventor of vaccines was jewish?

We're all having fun here but at least try to base your arguments on reality

Educate yourself.

Attached: 1539877287803.png (1645x750, 115K)

Are you saying you don't get vaccinated right after birth?

Contrarianism

I'm impressed and surprised how violent and illogical so many people are against this "anti-vax" boogeyman. It's utter horseshit how easily the 'intelligent' population is led into believing this propaganda that vaccines cant hurt you despite tonnes of bad side effects, many sufferers of which are paid out with tax money and have to sign an NDA. Most people actually think vaccines have no negative side effects at all, unlike every other fucking modern blockbuster drug which causes ulcers or heart disease or osteoporosis.
>Yeah, there is a 1/1000 chance my child might suffer a terrible fever and get some brain damage, but i care so much about my neighbours and the greater good i'll kill my firstborn for their potential well-being.

Im convinced the "anti-vax" shit is a psyop design to shepherd people into being blind idiots queuing up for vaccines.

Did you know the entire shitstorm around autism-vaccine link was started illegally by the corporations that produce vaccines colluding with the medical board to strike off the researchers involved, and one of them successfully appealed it to the high court, who commented on how appalling and unscientific the entire drama was?
Did you know the original paper published by wakefield and his colleague didn't actually say vaccines cause autism, but showed some correlation in *some* kids, which is much less dramatic and much more plausible.
Despite all the corrupt shit and obvious as fuck motives the vaccine industry had for stopping this research and making it tabboo to even entertain the idea, all your common shit-for-brains idiot can muster up is
>muh herd immunity
>muh antivaxers bad cause all my news channels tell me bad
>muh i fucking love science!!!11

I was just replying to the user saying that you get most vaccines at birth as an all in one shot

It is a psyops but not for that. People already are sheep. The reason antivax popped up all of a sudden at the same time flat earthers did was to highlight how "dumb" conspiracy theories sound so they could discredit WikiLeaks and everything regarding the globalist agenda that has been exposed. This way the general population is trained to perceive conspiracy theorists as utterly insane and transfer that judgement to the ones pointing out globalist schemes the next time a famous media person call them a conspiracy theorist as well. It's just a very elaborate ad hominem.

>Most people actually think vaccines have no negative side effects at all
Yeah no

ATTENTION SHIT ASS FUCK NUT:

Vaccines
Are
Dangerous
And
Should
Be
Abolished,
As
Should
Much of allopathic medicine today
Jewish piece of shit

Just when you thought it couldn't get worse than phone posters and gaymer threads, Jow Forums finds a new way to degrade.

ORANGE MAN RIGHT
SCIENCE WRONG
See I can strawman too.

Is this the end of Jow Forums? Is /sci/ any better? Or have the Jow Forums retards destroyed it as well?

>Is /sci/ any better?
That depends. Do you like homework questions and online IQ tests? If not, /sci/ is not for you.

>the antivaxxers don't need the recommendations, they go looking
If they're looking then they're just after self-confirmation anyway, and they'll find it regardless of what youtube does in regards to hiding or removing antivax videos.
Probably the best thing Youtube could do is ensure that pro vax videos show up in at least equal numbers, and first, in anti vax videos so that people don't just get an echo chamber of conforming recommendations.

>muh jews
>muh gubmint
Anti-vax retards are have such lazy arguments.

it's to dissuade anti-vaxxers from leaving the platform. Keeps advertisers, techphobes and everyone else satisfied.

>>>/reddit/

>t. Clark County imbecile
>hurr vaccines bad
>let's not vaccinate our children because there's some 0.3% chance they are hypersensitive to it and get anaphylactic shock and MY child is more important than any other life, duh
>many retards buy into this "reasoning", enough to break herd immunity
>measles outbreak
>why did my child get measles, i thought herd immunity was real
only ameritards can be so dumb
to think that _you_, of all people, have a sample of smallpox laying around...

Human race survived for hundreds of thousands of years without vaxines. They are not needed.

>being so retarded that you don't even know the difference between vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs

Gee, I sure bet that Loius Pasteur was synthesizing complex organic molecules to vaccinate people with back in 1880. What a jew.

>this is what poltards actually believe
jeeze this chan sure hit the shitter the past decade

Vaccination for everything is bad. It doesn't allow immune system to develop properly. There's no reason to vaccinate against common cold. However, vaccination against aggresive virus, like hepatitis B, is good idea. Everything in moderation

>Muh Jooz
>muh gubbmnt
>muh tech conspiracy
>youtube is demonetizing my spam Baww!

Fuck off back to pol

For you probably. The mods love to delete wrongthink. That's why I browse /sci/ using the archives for the actually interesting tidbits outside of inane student and IQ threads

>allowing immune system to develop antibodies by injecting antigens isn't allowing it to properly develop antibodies
you're doing a good job at convincing me that being Jow Forumsack is equivalent to dementia

>There's no reason to vaccinate against common cold

There's no vaccination for the common cold.
There's a vaccine for strains of the influenza virus, because it kills hundreds of thousands of people a year.

vaxxing is botnet

>use adblock
>completely oblivious to all the ads

this does not concern me. i will vaccinate. other people don't have to if they don't want to. if they can't, then they die. im not obliged to undergo unwanted procedures to protect people with shitty immune systems.