is the pic related fast enought to do things like block microsodt telemetry, run snort and block all facebook domains? it does ansi so compatible with future PFSense.
What do you think?
is the pic related fast enought to do things like block microsodt telemetry, run snort and block all facebook domains? it does ansi so compatible with future PFSense.
What do you think?
Other urls found in this thread:
instructables.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Yes, should be plenty for a home network.
Yes, just don't expect some crazy fast VPN speeds or IPsec.
why do you need to hardware block facebook?
also, you'll need some RAM.
I meant this one with 4 gig ram and quad core
so he doesn't have to set up blocking connections to facebook on the 20 different computers, phones, security DVRs, audio receivers, automobiles, refrigerators, or alarm clocks he might have connected to his router.
I want be able to find out and block the whole facebook ip range. fb.com facebook.net etc ...
>he doesn't know that most routers have firewall settings built in
I know, but their slow cpu with packet filtering is slowing my gigabit
Instead of snort look into suricata. It supports multi-threading.
thanks a lot
Are you paranoid of Facebook or is this against employees?
Why?
are you justifiying spending 300usd for just copy pasting host?
>$35 rpi
>free hosts file
>no mom I NEED to drop $320 on this thing!
Fuckin ell man, people really buy this shit? Pic related, I just got all sorts of awesome business ideas.
>what is a router
ur dum
Why the literal fuck are you purchasing this.
t. Network Engineer
Explain, OP. Let me help you.
>$300 when you can get the same chinkboxes from aliexpress for $70~$100
>what is a router
It's something any Linux distro post 2000 can do. Fag.
>RPI can be a router
You're a fucking retard.
>paying 300 dollars to fucking block Facebook
The lengths that people will go.
literally anything with a network port can be a damn router. gtfo cisco shill.
Unless you are doing gig-e it can,
>plug in wan to pie
>usb->rj45
tada done enjoy shit up to like what 300mbps?
>with a network port
>a single network port
I guess you didn't want to have WAN and LAN? What fucking use is this?
>what are subinterfaces
Yer in over your head, kid
More like 45mbps after you consider the CPU and USB bottlenecks
>virtual interface is somehow going to sprout an Ethernet cable and connect to physical devices
????
>what is a $20 switch
keep running away, mr cisco man
No, you need to throw down more money
>mr cisco man
lel
ciscoman is the best superhero
>More like 45mbps after you consider the CPU and USB bottlenecks
Nigga you what? USB 2.0 is rated at 480mbps, it's realistically going to handle 300 after all is said and done. There is no way it's going to cut down to 1/10th of speed. There are multiple discussions on this if you just fucking google it, all stating they get at ISP level performance for what they pay
>one nic
>has to be used for connection from modem to RPI
How the fuck do you plan to use a switch you god damned monkey brain?
With that CPU I am assuming the raw throughput with just normal rules and such will be 500 meg to a gig for a few networks. I have personally pushed a few n3150 boxes that eat a gig pipe without complaint and room to spare.
AES bases VPN will I would guess be 30-50 mbit without AES-NI and around 100 mbit with, some VPN methods can use it, others can not.
Throughput after snort can be expected to drop to below 300mbit - possibly way below depending on your rules sets and such.
As you start tacking more features in expect the bandwidth to drop even further
Commercial deployment option for that hardware spec with pfSense would be SOHO with up to 100mbit connection, a small services box, a edge VPN terminator for a 10-100mbit line. - I spec those options by lowest expected performance.