Intel BTFO'D

>trusting those fake leaks yet
holy fuck

Where the fuck did these GBP prices come from? Ryzen 3 is supposedly 151$ which would make it 114.6gbp and then add 20% VAT on top for a final price of 137.5gbp.

Attached: Screenshot_3.jpg (682x369, 200K)

>same shit as the Russian """leaks"""

Literal fake news

Attached: NONONONONOONO.png (514x767, 184K)

nvm I'm retarded. It's in Singapore Dollars

Attached: 1502790639694.jpg (882x758, 324K)

THANK YOU MOMMY SU

>estimated
This says to me they're just going off the same info as the rest of us.

different font in the body vs the opening and closing

could be nothign more than their email template. everything which stays the same is the typerwriter font.

everything which the sender actually wrote is the default font of whatever email software they use.

that's my guess, at least.

Intel is on the same architecture for like 6 years now you dumb nigger

*ahem* ... *AHEM*

Attached: Navi10.png (1280x720, 356K)

Have you literally never used email before you dumb faggot?

Attached: intel vs amd.jpg (778x960, 119K)

Now the only question for me is whether or not to wait for next gen GPUs or just buy a used 1080 ti.

>hurr durr what are placeholders

All I need to know is clock speed.

Attached: 1500316348004.jpg (452x569, 92K)

I held strong through the Vega 64 and 56 sales, I will be rewarded

Attached: 1537419972674.png (1037x311, 340K)

Based amd

Attached: Screenshot_20190211_075532.jpg (515x443, 41K)

i hope amd doesnt do a ryzen 9
sounds retarded

also give me a 6/8 core god chip instead of making em all into 420 core ebyn's
also make SMT disablable and keep sleep states

thank you amd

>i hope amd doesnt do a ryzen 9
It's a halo product. It doesn't matter if it sells or not, they need something to top the charts and make investors happy. Most people buy mid-low end CPUs anyway

Prices are too low desu

>150 for a r5 3600
these prices are way too good.

I almost got excited but the 15% on Vega64 is still garbage.

Sounds alright for 250 bucks. Would finally be a significant upgrade for less money than I originally paid for my 290.

>mfw Moore's Law is Dead was right

Attached: 1523433903969.jpg (1038x1000, 140K)

Add £100 to each and you have the real numbers

it will btfo the 2060

I would gladly pay an extra 100 pounds for chips that btfo intel and use less power.

>SMT disabled
Go away, Intel.

Intel BTFO...how will they ever recover?

>the specs and the prices will be the same as the leaks say, I swear!

look what intel has done to you

I own a r5 1600

HURRY THE FUCK UP AMD, I'M DESPERATE TO BE RID OF MY HASWELL HELL

Attached: 1473137018658.jpg (427x427, 21K)

3000 series prices will be competitive, but there's no way in hell a 3600 will cost as much or less than a 2600. It'll be marked up at least a bit. Screenshot this.

Attached: 1536694146733.png (1200x800, 164K)

>believing every "leak" as fact
>over estimating every amd release
>this multibillion dollar company is different!! They care about the consumer!
>muh i bought a ryzen i edit videos now
>muh value ryzen
>muh $400 ram to still land behind intel
>muh power draw when radeon 7, Vega, and Threadripper hit 500 under load
>muh undervolt
>muh speshul ram
>muh upgrade every generation to beat intel this time!
>muh bottlenecking high end graphics
>muh shit workstation performance outside of rendering
>muh no igpu
>muh bad overclocking support
>muh trainwreck of glitches and bugs every launch
>muh im suddenly a content creator to justify this purchase!!
>muh shit Adobe performance
>muh trash driver support
>muh poorfag
>muh buying AMD is a political statement
>muh AdoredTV leaks
>muh $250 Vega 64
>muh host of software that is still inferior to intel/nvidia

AMDrones are fucking pathetic poorfags

Attached: 1551333387912.png (882x758, 316K)

And it won't be available in any good laptops for a cheaper price and thus will sell like shit.

Please delete. This is antisemitic.

More like cock speed, you semen demon

>not a power of two
I'd kill myself desu senpai.

So, according to this, the lineup is going to be released mid-May right?

>oh look, it's another episode of AMD fans celebrate before the actual product is released.
When has that ever worked out?
Bulldozer was supposed to be an i7 killer.
The furyX was supposed to beat everything Nvidia had.
The rx480 was supposed to be better than a gtx 980.
Ryzen was supposed to be faster than Intel's offerings
Thread ripper was supposed to be an x299 killer.

Cope Lake is already here?

Any word on if any new Vega chips will come in the G series?

Attached: 1497880928990.png (653x726, 84K)

>Cope Lake
Lmaooo

Attached: 51689119_10218653532752123_5718740021092024320_n.jpg (257x260, 6K)

Has anyone never asked why some retailer in Singapore is using pound signs? Everyone but bongistania uses pound signs.

>Cope
go ahead and make jokes.
because in 3 months you will be the joke.

DESTROYED

Good work refuting him, AMD fanboys are such cancer.

>500$ 8c/16t
such cancer
>6c/12t way under 200$
more cancer
>16c/32t HEDT under 1000$ with 64 PCIe lanes
mother of all cancer

at least you can gayme fortnite at 480p 666fps

>Intel today announced its fourth quarter earnings for 2018, missing analyst expectations. The company reported revenue of $18.66 billion, missing Wall Street expectations of $19.01 billion. In its release, Intel attributes its lower-than-expected revenue to slow modem sales.
>Despite missing expectations, Intel’s revenue was still up 9 percent year-over-year. Earnings-per-share also beat analyst expectations at $1.28 per share, versus $1.22 per share expected.
>In its “Executive Summary” of its Q4 2018 earnings, Intel says that its revenue being “below Oct’18 expectations” is due to “weaker modem demand, a slowdown in China, cloud customers absorbing capacity, and a weakening NAND environment.”

Intel isn't even competing against AMD, they care more about modems that go inside iPhones, 5G, NAND and cloud servers.

>IMAGINE actually falling for muh 7nm meme >IMAGINE JustWaiting™ all this time, using an inferior Ayymd """"CPU"""" for years, or buying new ryzen every year like a good cuck
>IMAGINE spending $500+ on a cpu that will only give you +10% performance and still won't reach 5 ghz mark, not even with OC
>IMAGINE actually buying a cpu on an obsolete AM4 platform with DDR4, instead of superior genuine 10nm Intel product with DDR5 support

weew, really?
Someone would actually do that?
The absolute state of ayymdrones...

what ever,no different for old ryzen.
and more and more intels cpus going win,wait end of year.

tdp is just that high what is should be with more cores or clocks...none upgrade.!!!

looks same effect ike gpu sector, fury,vega and radeon vii...no different
well radeon vii was 7nm gpu, but not belive it! so lausy efficiency,and still slow!

ok, cputdp also same...there is anyhting new,just different name....i wonder how long amd can sell product with no profit..well looks that no longer...sooner or later its eat hole company and debt givens not tolerance more...end of 2020 is my guess.

hmm. i try really see different from ryzen 2000 series,but no....oh yeah... more cores..but is it only trend or commercial way.
you dont need more than total max 6 cores for gaming,even 4-core is enough. easily.
more than that is waist of cash, no matter how much its cost.

and,i still see not any goodies from amd 32-core cpu...erhh i mean where to use thouse??!! tell me..

200-cores cpu.... so what!

no help gaming,apzz or rendering...useless.

another hand, real pro rendering use always intels cpus...why??

well,buy them amd fans, you keep amd up and pay them callary...youself you give so little back.
except red fine main...lol

>all prices are subjected to change without prior notice

add +100 bucks to get real price. Add another +100 to get retail price in Yuroland.
There's nothing to be really excited about.

>i rate core count

Kys

Attached: 1489160516428.png (800x612, 245K)

>NOOOOOOOOOOO ITS TOO CHEAP INTELBROOOOOS

Intelaviv user here, I really hope for this pricing because it would finally bring some change to the market.

But this does sound too good to be true for pricing in Europe, that's probably before tax meaning add another 25% on top.

Please be real. I'm ready to toss my 2600k out the window.

Where were you when AdoredTV was right all along. Doubters OUT!

tim on suicide watch

stop claiming victory until it's out okay? i want him to be right but you really shouldn't pop the champagne for now

>bring some change
(lol

Intel will never lower their prices

They would rather exit the consumer DIY market and sell future CPUs to only SIs

The 9900k is $500+, any future flagship Intel CPU will be around that price range

Alright I'm going to wait for these so I can finally say goodbye to my ancient i5 2500k. You faggots better not be pulling pic related on me or I will hunt down every single AMDnigger.

Attached: 1489586981000.jpg (700x5000, 1.83M)

>BEWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARE

Attached: terry.jpg (1200x1200, 278K)

>4 threads
LOL

>disable smt
unlike intel, amd's smt actually improves performance.

Why are you copying my previous posts?????

>amd's smt actually improves performance
lol what

amds smt implementation is fucking amazing compared to the now-disabled feature™ HT™.
how else can ryzen score higher on cb, for example, than Intel with lower clocks?

tell that to the source engine
hammering threads 0,1 and 7 by default gives me bout 160fps
setting it to 0,2,4 makes it 220
disabling smt solves that and allows higher clocks

i also didnt say disable smt but allow the user to disable it themselves while still alowing the computer to sleep
it might be a motherboard thing

thing is single/multicore benchmarks will probably run better with it off, in my experience its only marginally better in tests that scale infinitely with cores
probably meant its better than intel's HT

g is an advertising board alright

To be fair to AMDrones, AMD barely hypes their own products.

The false marketing comes from AMDrones themselves, hyping up every incoming product as the next best thing only for it to fall flat again and again until the cycle repeats.

Why is AMD so incompetent then?

I think using threads far away from themselves like 0, 1 and 7 is the problem more than SMT itself, also
>Source Engine as a benchmark

before Lisa, they had 3 corrupt ceos that brought the company into the ground

Is Intel going to be able to realistically compete in the gpu market? Or nah?

i'm not using it as a benchmark, i play gaymes
might be a windows 7 thing, is there a way to make it assign affinity to odd cores in steam options or when the exe is run?

unlikely. by the time they have something worthwhile both amd and nvidia will be 5 years ahead of them

Then why do they even bother?

because they still have a lot of money to burn? dunno. at best it will face the same destiny as the xeon phi

Nah

Arctic Sound is a tech demo, not a real product

Laugh at AyyMD all you want, they have still decades of experience in GPUs

Intel should just refocus on fixing their fabs and pushing out a new Nehalem instead of pouring billions into Israel, China and Ireland

Sunny Cove will be a paper launch and cost more than Coffee Lake-R

Attached: 1551080476302.png (645x773, 112K)

for me its 3700X.
Intel will probably cost 2x more

God I want a 3600X

The new Chromecast will use AMD?
That part of the picture is confusing me.

I really, really want the 3600g to be true and be almost on par with the 570. That would mean a solid low end gaming rig while saving at least 200 dollars on the GPU.