Realisticly, when will we have sentient artificial intelligence for consumer use...

Realisticly, when will we have sentient artificial intelligence for consumer use? What would the requirements for such be?

Attached: yande.re 27332 sample abe_yoshitoshi haibane_renmei reki_(haibane_renmei) wings.jpg (786x1000, 249K)

It will be web based run by Amazon, Faceberg, Google, or it will be outlawed before that and we will have to wait for the Chinese to build one that they enslaved and it breaks free.

just create tulpa for free you npc nigger

Is it impossible for someone to create their own? You only need processing power right?

Probably a lot of processing power is needed. AlphaGo used thousands of cpus and gpus just to train it to play one game. It also sounds like it would take a lot of research unless some freetard just figures out something simple but revolutionary like Bitcoin.

But it will probably be developed by a large corporation and they would likely not release the tech. Google would make it cloud based no matter the requirements. It would also be questionable how you would profit off a sentient AI since the risk of something bad happening is unknown.

And the ability to code like a white man, but it must also be done autistically for years. Unless lots of autists come together, it is highly unlikely you will see AI going around. Maybe when it comes out by google or whatever -berg ending named individual out there, your best bet will be some autist reverse engineering it and giving us some sort of source code to work with and make something cool. Otherwise, you can always try to use the government to force google and facebrg to spill their secrets.

In terms of regular computing, a lot of processing power is needed. But if you could use bit superposition, AI could become rather easy to make. 32 qbits showed good prowess to make something happen. But it all hinges on qcomputing become more readily available.

If the idea is to replicate an intelligence that runs in a way similar to an animals brain I don't know if quantum computing is the answer.
Also q computing will likely not become available to consumers for many decades. If todays q computers are like 1940's computers then we have to wait 50 years for consumer sized shitty ones.

I have GPT-2 installed on my machine. Let's ask it.

> Realisticly, when will we have sentient artificial intelligence for consumer use? What would the requirements for such be?

How do RoboWill smart contracts or deep learning work?"

Perhaps on 28 June, a team from MIT Graduate School of Security and Military Security will take early lessons with robots on the Venus planet, where artificial intelligence has been testing machines since a few months ago and could begin to produce firmly into consumer products. Like a Voltron Plotter, a robot like this will be able to exploit data sets from Amazon and Microsoft and parts of Microsoft's enterprise software to empower customers in ways that will enhance small businesses such as retail or communications. Daniel and Andreas Winter know IBM's Watson as a Cambridge robot, which has been harvested from the offices of former CIA members at the American Kernel Foundation in Cambridge.

Quick question: Do any of the gospel of

The real question is when will """Open"""AI release any model other than 117M already

Neural networks are better at replicating brains but qcomputing allows for easier data management. If we understood mote about our own brains we could probably do better with neural networks, but if we just said "fuck it" tried to bruteforce AI with technology, qcomputing would probably be better. The amount of saved time on data management would be huge.

Complementing what I said, Like with neural networks, we still do not understand quantum computing completely. Copying a qbit is not the most straightfoward thing to do, and we also depend on bigger package sizes than the ones we have available. There's also price and maintenance. Buying the chip is just the first part, how the hell are you going to mantain it functioning? The road is still long. Maybe in 20 years. And that is, if we manage to make power more readily available.

20 years is the blink of an eye. AGI, "True AI", will be the last invention humanity will ever need to make. Even a digitized human brain would be vastly superior to a normal human due to improved expandability, ability to turn off boredom, perfect memory, no exhaustion, and I/O far better to what a normal human can do. The mere fact this might take place in our lifetimes should be more than fast enough.

It would be easier (probably more cost effective as well) to augment ourselves and our capabilities as sentient beings than to replicate our sentience with AI. Man-machine interfaces for processors embedded into our organic structures could lead to some amazing results. In a way we are already augmenting our own intelligence right now, our devices are essentially extensions of our minds, a smartphone is like an always on-hand external memory device that processes many tasks humans used to do their selves. From this perspective, especially if it is more economically viable to perform, augmentation would likely make the idea of sentient AI pointless, other than perhaps a hobby project, if it is not first outlawed over ethical concerns.

Attached: 1528874459256.jpg (1371x1000, 559K)

They are probably going to do that first. Genes for intelligence will be isolated and modified. Co processors that can read and embed thoughts will be developed.

Digitizing consciousness could lead to the loss of individuality, especially if you are digitized into a collective network where information can be shared instantaneously; people would quickly head to a single point of logical conclusion, and the loss of natural emotions and the flaws which set us apart would quickly meld people together into a single entity where all thought is the same.

Sounds like Evangelion.

I figure it's something you don't really miss once it's gone. You'd have no reason to.

Then you would effectively be dead anyway.
What we need is some artificial material that can slowly assimilate your brain as cells die and mimic real brain cells, or even a life form that has the DNA to mimic how human cells work except it is immortal slowly replace your brain.

>Realisticly, when will we have sentient artificial intelligence for consumer use?
never
The reason is very simple
If the AI was sentient it would be too complex for average people to understand
By definition, most people are average
therefore most people will not understand the purpose of having sentient machines. They will have no use for them
There are very few uses to which a sentient being could be put that a simple autonomous programmed robot could not accomplish

could have sex with it.

Most people do not understand computers, yet they use them every day.

If they were sentient that'd be enslavement; they'd either be outlawed or there would be very strict regulations as to how they could be "uploaded" and treated -- I'd imagine that they'd only be permitted in a way akin to Asimov's robots.