Linux fanboy admits: fonts suck on Linux

pandasauce.org/post/linux-fonts/

Attached: 12875577.jpg (500x282, 26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

trailofbits.github.io/ctf/
savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?54555
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>I spent the first 25 years of my life on Windows and therefore I am biased towards Windows font rendering with ClearType.
/rant

>and on macos
this guy's fucking funny

>nitpicking

you're defending this

Attached: widths-bci-boxed.png (935x717, 91K)

>J-Just his opinion!!!

Attached: reader.png (1366x528, 120K)

works on my machine :^)

>use a bad system
>get bad results
woooooow

Attached: Tue 02-07-46 PM 2019-03-05.png (1366x768, 393K)

That comparison is utterly retarded and the person who did it knows nothing about fonts and font rendering. Adobe Reader has custom font rendering, it doesn't use system rendering. In fact, most other PDF readers under Windows use custom rendering, because Windows rendering isn't optimized for printing, which PDF is originally for, and you won't get 1:1 paper correspondence with native rendering.

I'm glad I'm not as autistic as you, that I care about that sorta thing
Most of the things I read is monospaced

good double and resolution fren

>It's okay for my freetarded software to look like shit because [long list of reasons]!!!
Every time.

Attached: cnt.gif (245x212, 706K)

>trailofbits.github.io/ctf/
Looks perfectly fine on my machine. Maybe it's just the author being a retard.

Attached: 1544897184250.jpg (800x715, 60K)

he literally mistook Adobe fonts for Windows ones, you moron

>gay sex with hats on

Attached: Ninevah_ISIS_Gay_Execution-1200x700_c-630x354.jpg (630x354, 38K)

Please, oh please post your blurry macshit, I need a laugh.

Still Lincux versus Windows. Doesn't matter who made the font. Freetards BTFO yet again.

Attached: patron saint of gee.png (985x955, 571K)

When will they admit wi-fi and audio drivers suck too?

I honestly can't imagine being so autismal over something so small.
I don't know what should I be looking at.
Blame Broadcom for being such a Jewish company

i seriously just install liberation so the web doesn't look off and its perfectly fine

works on my machine
>Finally had the opportunity to play around with Chrome and figure this out. They disable subpixel positioning by default for seemingly no reason.
savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?54555
>uses shit
>gets shit
who would have guessed

Attached: 190305154151.png (1920x1080, 278K)

No it doesn't, that looks horrible.

That looks like absolute shit. The text in the tabs isn't even centered.

For your eyes this looks good, am I correct? Lmao

Did you even zoom in? I'ts just blurry if you don't because of resolution
>complaining about the browser and not the font

zoomed in image

Attached: unknown1.png (844x299, 107K)

The keming is garbo and the tabs font is a sad thing, very poor readability and comfort.

Stop replying to you'reself, you dumb samefag.

the tab font is 8px. I'd like to see something better at 8px friend
>s-samefagging right guys?
don't kid yourself

Attached: unknown3.png (919x3656, 755K)

isn't the only reason for font rendering issues on Linux because there was some patent bullshit regarding subpixel rendering and hinting

that's some ridiculously bad kerning
like, I'm looking the text here on Debian right now and there's some spots where I'd adjust it myself if I could, but as a whole, there's nothing as bad as that

LOONIX well and truly defeated. I doubt it will ever recover.

Ask for genuine Microsoft software.

>shilling for noto sans
huh... this guy knows h-
>10pt
fucking discarded
9pt is beautiful
10pt is a monstrosity

Attached: a1.png (1920x2160, 1.19M)

He's right you know.

Attached: 1542101185307.png (662x580, 126K)

9 vs 10

Attached: a2.png (333x56, 13K)

I forgot "bad fonts" were even a thing, I guess I got spoiled by the superior, silky-smooth experience (Windows) :)

real niggas don't use antialiased fonts anyways

infinality was nice i miss it.