Cinebench is DED. IRRELEVANT now

techpowerup.com/253317/maxon-releases-cinebench-r20-benchmark
>The benchmark implements Intel Embree ray-tracing engine
So, Cinebench now is a full cuck of Inturd's and is heavily Inturd-biased. Great. To the trash it immediately goes and good riddance.

Attached: 1551790429102.jpg (1280x720, 131K)

SEETHING AYYMD POORSHIT

|
|>
|
|
|

Attached: result.jpg (2879x1396, 758K)

Attached: 1550849278222.png (396x408, 165K)

AMD always has single core scores to fall back on.

With singlecore score

Attached: result2.jpg (3334x1406, 422K)

And now multicore won't matter anymore until anons post oced Intel results.

Cinebench should implement GeForce RTX ray-tracing to remain impartial.

Figured i'd post a result at 5ghz

Attached: lol.jpg (1647x798, 371K)

Attached: 1488462576190.png (882x758, 316K)

That's pretty cool, it'll be interesting to see how ryzen 3000 competes

AMDJEETS BTFO

Attached: bullied2.gif (480x270, 2.49M)

Single core?

What are you trying to prove?

running now.

Ive got a 4k Monitor ?

Look at the setup, Intbecile. Those Xeons are multi-socket. 2S and 4S versus single THREADRIPPER that's not even top tier model. Disgustingly lame. And then there's also this factor in the play:

Attached: 1543201660279.png (631x310, 14K)

I can install Software im so smart :)

>7700K

Attached: 5685jn65n.png (1323x375, 3.79M)

>US Dollars (higher is better)
I feel like taking crazy pills here. Better at what? Emptying my bank account?

Attached: 1524204671120.gif (245x210, 1.84M)

Only thing you're trying to prove is that you're poor and stupid.

Attached: 2ldenj.jpg (640x845, 108K)

Why are the cb points getting higher for the same processors? What does cinebench mean by this?

But there are single die Intel CPUs that have the same core count, and the capabilities to match it's speed, or be faster.

Figured i'd run multicore one more time.

Attached: lol2.jpg (1644x795, 376K)

is this a cinebench thread now? result from thinkpad t480s

Attached: cb.png (1920x1170, 2.29M)

Are you an amdpoo? More expensive means betterer of course.

btfo

Attached: haha.jpg (925x921, 287K)

thx4that user. gonna be a wild ride with benchmarks soon.

Why would I get a Ryzen 2700X if I can get an i7 9700K for $60 more and about 10 fps more at 4K? Serious question. I don't understand why people think it's MUCH better value for money.

9700k btfo 2700x by like 20-40% in some cases.

how much power did it draw during the test? does CB R20 have a stresstest where you can check system powerdraw from the wall?

Attached: intel-i7-9700K-f1-2018-1440p.png (981x896, 128K)

HWmonitor showed a peak draw of 177watts at 5ghz. Not very efficient but i don't care

seems kinda low when compared to other reviewers but thanks for the answer

oops i lied it was 184.7watts

Attached: fh.jpg (535x1013, 206K)

Because the extra threads allow more leverage for other tasks, especially multitasking. I'm planning an ESXi server for the near future and have been seriously considering TRs/8core Ryzens for that because of the extra threads and pcie lanes.
If otoh all you do is gayming, then sure, grab the 9700k instead.

Why not get a cheaper overclock able older gen xeon CPU?

0/10.

>single die Intel CPUs that have the same core count
>Intel
>60c
>single die

thats more like it, still think it 'should' be around 200W.

>1700X
FFS, who's having 2700X?

They're called Xeons.

see

Took them long enough to "fix" Cinebench.

Yes, BTFO'd indeed:

Attached: 1543241975159.png (1327x1222, 69K)

2S and 4S only, again, you coping Intbecile.

I undervolted as much i could

>server that will most likely run 24/7
>overclockable
Why would anyone even remotely consider that?

bet he delided his 9900Kelvin. wish there was a option to buy a CPU without IHS so you can do direct die cooling for both Intel & AMD

I don't come anywhere near those temps....The stock voltage the motherboard gives the chips is beyond retarded. This is a stupid chart.

Here's delidded and with liquid metal applied:

Attached: 1546961725525.png (1024x576, 252K)

>2S, and 4S only
Are those the only Xeons that exist in your head cannon?
Maybe I should just keep the big secret to myself then since I'm about to buy a few more 16+ cores with motherboard, and ram for pretty cheap.
MFW the CPUs are actually $49 on their own right now.

Cope & denial = the post.

Lol i don't care, You keep buying inferior hardware, I'm not stopping you.

Again, Intebecile, for the third time - there's no 1S 60 core Inturd, you dumb fuck.

>Why would anyone even remotely consider that?
Because they don't have to be used as a server. Also Adobe products, and black magic seem to like ecc ram.

>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Checks out, mateys.

Attached: 1512498277886.png (645x729, 99K)

Why are you posting your passport photo?

>Adobe products, and black magic seem to like ecc ram.
How so?

I never said 60 core, and 16-28core is good enough for me (especially since 16 core mobo/CPU, and sometimes ram can be had for $299).
And going for multi socket isn't a bad idea considering that Intel has more core density per die, so that curbs any latency issues from infinity fabric.

what kind of load needs a fuckload of cores as well as low latency, are you a hwtrader ?

The difference isn't amazing, but it's there (in Photoshop). I imagine that it depends on how much you're loading into ram, and how long you keep it in there.

I guess it's time for the amdfags
>Doesn't use x software, or play y game argument
Everytime.

You dolt, im just honestly curious.

What type of workload doesn't improve with improved latency?

nice 4core 8 thread intel shitting on my 2600 ryzen. Thanks amd

Don't worry about it. Buy AMD.

I hate intel and i love and, but those multisocket xeon Xxxxx and Exxxx are 10+ years old, you fucking idiot

With Powerlimits removed for PBO on Stock RGB Madness

Attached: result3 light pbo.jpg (3334x1406, 433K)

My 1700x @ 3.82 ghz barely beats a fucking E5-2697 V2 @ 2.7ghz and that's a processor from 2013.
I live in the asia pacific and got my 1700x at launch for $438 USD while the E5-2697 V2 + brand new motherboard combos are $360 USD not to mention the 1866 16GB Samsung ECC ram being half the price of a single slice of Kingston DDR4 2666 mhz 16gb value ram. Even with the recent 2700x price cuts they still go for near $370 USD here.

How do I cope?

Attached: 1700.png (379x621, 40K)

>197 vs 240 FPS
AYYMD IS LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE

sell all that shit away
get a girlfriend instead?

You didn't understand the question: how does a system designed to prevent data corruption by electrical interference affect performance of very specific software in a noticeable way without falling into margin of error?

Attached: i-do-not-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means.jpg (600x400, 138K)

>intel pentiumg5600 is 145 FPS
>LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE, I should get a 8 core ryzen for this!

Based.

no please good sir, do the needful and get ryzen instead
that 2 core 4 thread intel CPU for 50$ is not good enough you need ryzen!
but don't get intel that is even better than ryzen because rolf lamo who needs 240fps vs 197 fps
but you should definitely get ryzen for 163fps vs 145 fps

>buying the X modell
>crying your 8c CPU 'barely' beats a 12c CPU
kys yourself

Hmm performance not looking so hot, better buy more benchmarks.

>(higher is better)

Attached: homr hapi.jpg (426x436, 36K)

Notice how "fps differences don't matter when you compare ryzen to intels mid-hight end because "all you need is 60 fps"
But then when you compare ryzen to the bottom end intel suddenly 145 fps is not good enough and you most certainly need to get ryzen thread ripper because it's the only way to be future proof against my multithreaded games that any day now will use 100+ moar cores

You use Intel tactics and cope with having better single thread score

Barely beats a cpu from "half a decade ago"
Bought the X model because of all you faggots saying moar TDP for higher overclocking headroom.

Seething AMDumbs will never learn.

that xeon retailed new for like 2700$ according to intel website it's not really fair to compare these 2 products even if they are few years apart

>fucking 7700k getting best 0.1% and 1% frametimes due to the fact it has lowest latency while also having enough cores and threads compared to slower 8 core variants be it intel or even worse so ryzen
It's just so stupid. CPUs are designed for latency sensitive tasks and GPUs are for throughput. Getting more cores and threads is nice, but not if it comes at the cost of latency.

Attached: latency-pingtimes.png (602x389, 124K)

Probably by keeping that data free of errors while it is stored inside ram for an extended period?

AMD sure loved to compare Ryzen with the 6900K and other products on their own slides.

AMD shills won't ever understand what latency is. It's best to just let it be and let them have their pity party.

>7700K getting best frame times
Enjoying your s-s-s-s-s-st-st-stut-stutter-i-i-ing yet?

>I never said 60 core, and 16-28core is good enough for me
Look at the pic, Intbecile. That was the whole point. The Intbeciles comparing 2S and 4S Xeons with a single non-top THREADRIPPER to somehow make Inturd seem look like a better scoring poocessor.

Enjoying your constant screen tear yet?

It doesn't, you imbecile.

Nigger if you don't know what you're talking about just don't make stuff up.
You want ecc to prevent from crashes and data loss. The performance loss from using ecc ram is in most times neglegible.

I very much understand what latency is, my friend.
It is a very special word for my chai latte thungienes.
-t. Rahmalahmadingdong

oh they do understand what it is, they just "conveniently" forget to mention it when shilling it to other people who have no idea how PC or CPUs work.
I am just tired of people acting like moar cores is literally the only thing that matters.
If that was the case, we would use GPUS instead of CPUS, as those have lots of cores, high throughput but suck at latency sensitive tasks.
Idiots don't know or understand this though.

>770k has
>79.5 0.1% frametimes
>139.9 1% frametimes
>226 average frametimes
AHAHA St-t-t--t-tt-t-t-t-tsuterssss intel LAMO

>okay lets look at ryzens "smooth performance"
>ryzen 2700
>60.8 0.1% frametimes
>120 1% frametimes
>201.4 average frametimes
It bothers me that retards like you can't even look at the graph.

>10+ years old
Yet the pricing is same, you fucking idiot.

>FreeSync 2.0
>Screen tear

Attached: 1539237186694.png (400x400, 13K)

an other metric nobody takes but rizen excels in is actually the intercore latency consistency. that is what actually makes the Zen chips a smother ride.