Oh no no no no no

Oh no no no no no

Attached: file.png (640x360, 238K)

Other urls found in this thread:

digiworthy.com/2018/04/28/ryzen-7-2700x-memory-opt-benches/
youtube.com/watch?v=HsQAtsKX3mE
newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113428
hothardware.com/news/intel-spolier-speculative-execution-spectre
youtube.com/watch?v=8e3W6jaUiq0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>LESS CORES
>MOAR SOCKETS
well worf it m8

Attached: 2019-03-08-10-26-10.jpg (967x1080, 102K)

whats the problem here, its just the simplest way of showing exactly 2x performance

>Ebin zeppins

Attached: 364.png (448x357, 3K)

Anybody got that similar benchmark but had a nazi windmill inside a jewish star on the logo?

Yeah, you definitely need a chart to describe the complexity of the situation.

Ehem...

Attached: relativeperformancegames19201080_1.png (500x1490, 96K)

they might feel the need to treat the audience like retards because the audience might often really be retards

delete this or I'll post the nigger word.

AHEM

Attached: Vega56 (1).png (1323x1665, 104K)

I also love spending 200 dollars on 8% vihdeyo gayme improovmint

Raakesh open your fucking eyes the 2700x is worse than the locked i5 no wonder amd endlessly slashes prices

But Jow Forums said ryzen is better

Attached: 1552016122346.png (500x279, 15K)

wow amd is so far behind lmaOOOOOOOOOO
what a joeekeeeeeeee
sike

What's really interesting is the 2700X is 95% as fast as an i7-8700K BUT only if you use good RAM. Oh well hopefully this gets fixed on zen 2. Still good to know you don't have to use swiss cheese as your CPU if you want to play vidya.

digiworthy.com/2018/04/28/ryzen-7-2700x-memory-opt-benches/

Attached: Comb10102018092249.jpg (641x2895, 423K)

>Ryzen 7 1700
>over 140 FPS
fake

bait

Yup, it's amazing what faster RAM with tight timings can do on ryzen.

youtube.com/watch?v=HsQAtsKX3mE

Not for 1700 its dogshit all around

Nope, at worst you'll get a 3.9GHz 1.4v OC which can easily be handled by a hyper 212 evo. That's only ~3% slower than that 1800X @ 4.05 GHz.

>tfw zen 2 will drop the 1700 to around $100

newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113428

b-but I dropped my life savings on a new ryzen build...

Attached: 1521080600510.gif (647x363, 650K)

i cant believe there are posters itt shitting on amd because they didnt see the joke

>the newer and/or more expensive product is better
Did you really need a chart to figure that out?

Attached: 1551489373017.png (294x256, 197K)

>i cant believe there are posters itt shitting on amd

Attached: 1550849278222.png (396x408, 165K)

2700x and 2600x came out after the i5 8400

Attached: 1546164463229.png (300x350, 131K)

Nope, the 1700 is shit

There's nothing really to fix, better RAM will give you better results if the CPU can utilize it.
If Intel CPUs were as optimized, they would blow the 2700X into oblivion with better RAM.

Kek.
How will amdrones ever recover

Okay well when intel releases an 8c16t 5 GHz CPU for $100 you let me know and I'll drop AMD on the spot.

thanks for cutting half the post to strawman im sure no one will notice

But the 8400 also costs more than a 2600X. On average a whole 3 USD.
Try again, shill, you're still factually wrong.

Attached: 1551986317337.png (780x720, 457K)

>bigger number is better
And this is why retards bought bulldozer

Attached: Abo.jpg (618x462, 253K)

>less wattage
>performs better
>not amd
>only 3 dollars more

Attached: 1545411375230.gif (192x291, 363K)

GIVE ME 3700X ALREADY

>tfw 9900k performance for half the price and power

Attached: 1544151118468.gif (498x427, 2.52M)

Why is Ryzen even considered budget king then? Even by unbiased reviewers?
Is it simply because less vulnerabilities for the same price and power?

>less wattage
lolwut?

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9DLzkvODA1MjU3L29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDA3LnBuZw==(1).jpg (755x561, 109K)

>>not amd
[spoiler]You say it like it's a good thing.[/spoiler]

Attached: 1463493102580.gif (280x250, 2.58M)

>[/spoiler]
kek

because pic related intards desperately don't want you to see

Attached: 1534326485713.png (1824x1026, 431K)

Nice synthetic lmao meanwhile in real workloads

Attached: Power_01.png (1338x1436, 84K)

lmfaooooo your tags dont work here retard newfag

Attached: 1551807517270.gif (360x176, 2.65M)

Oh thanks. I didn't even notice that one was ShillPowerup, Hardware Unbiased is more credible.

>system power consumption
fuck outta here rabi, we're onto your plot to burn everyone's house down

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9PLzUvNzY1NTA5L29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDA4LnBuZw==(1).jpg (712x1435, 244K)

hothardware.com/news/intel-spolier-speculative-execution-spectre

Attached: 1551730933106.png (244x278, 71K)

Prime95 isnt a real workload lmfao enjoy the housefire

Attached: Power_04.png (1323x1510, 77K)

Twice the fucking wattage lmfaooook

Attached: power_cinebench-nt.png (849x803, 95K)

>system power consumption
Okay lad enjoy that intel processor turning your AIO into a bomb.

Attached: PCxRwPu.jpg (1327x1222, 331K)

I5 8400 btfo the 2600x all day

Attached: power_3dmark.png (849x919, 96K)

I love misleading graphs

>I5 8400 btfo the 2600x all day
Are you actually this delusional?

DELID

Attached: 1551992430207.jpg (640x640, 83K)

>7% performance boost for 200% the price

>twice the wattage for 8% mOre performance with high end ram, overclocking board, aftermaket cooler
XDDDDDD

8400 costs less than the 2700x scam by quite a bit

Oh you mean the one with only 2% performance difference in one specific 1080p task?

Yeah the one the costs way less and pulls way less wattage, that one. The 8400

>>twice the wattage
>20-30W is twice (while the CPU costs the same)

>with high end ram, overclocking board, aftermaket cooler
Same RAM, no need for a overclocking board or aftermarket cooler. The benchmark is a 2600 as you can see, the 2600X is a different CPU that runs at higher clock speeds and comes with a beefier stock cooler by default.

I mean, I know you're just a shitposting retard, probably projecting even, but at least you should know some basic shit.

>performs better
the 8400 can't even touch the 2600, let alone the 2600X
are shills THIS out of ideas?

>costs way less and pulls way less wattage
You mean the one that costs the same but pulls slightly more wattage while getting better performance in return?
Cope harder.

Attached: Laughing Whore.jpg (762x900, 161K)

>it's gonna be a drop in upgrade for current AMD motherboards
YES

Attached: 1551041111975.jpg (500x533, 130K)

wtf who makes a graph like that?

Oh, the 8400! The one that isn't overclockable. Lmao

Hell yeah brother crank it to 1.4 and pull 150w maybe you can surpass the humble locked and much cheaper i5

July™

>you mean this shit i just made with no source
Not at all

Attached: 1491916955985.png (653x726, 42K)

>Same RAM
Fuck me
That means with better memory you could even get better results

Do I really need to post Amazon links to a 8400 and 2600X? I'm sure you can do at least that much yourself. They are usually being sold within 10 USD difference, usually even less.

Performance wise:
Power consumption wise while running a game: Don't confuse the 2600 and 2600X again either.

Shut the fuck up retard a 2600 and a 2600x both pegged at 4.2ghz perform the same and pull the same wattage its the same chip one is just slightly more binned with a better cooler on it for more money

Honestly just have to commend you for this top tier baiting, It's like people don't even look at the actual numbers and i love it

Attached: imagefg0.jpg (272x153, 17K)

No. 2600X is higher quality yield silicon. It supports PBO and boosts up to 4.2GHz automatically.
2600 has no PBO and only goes up to 3.9GHz and you'll be lucky if you can manually OC it to 4GHz, since it's a lower quality chip.

Not to mention, you'd be a huge retard to manually try to overclock Ryzen in the first place. PBO (now with undervolting on even cheap boards) is the best solution in any case.
I don't even own a Ryzen CPU (anymore at least, no AMD at all actually) but at least I'm not a retard on the topic.

There's nothing to even look at, both CPUs are shit. One is slow but cheap and the other is full of vulnerabilities.
GIVE ME ZEN 2

BAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
AMD FAGS BLOWN.THE.FUCK.OUT
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1529001488491.jpg (640x621, 45K)

now post it with all mitigations enabled
especially the rowhammer enabler vulnerability released this month is going to fuck up RAM timing
(literally has to slow down RAM access, because there is no proper firmware patch)
kek

Don't forget kiddies, the intel speeds are taken with spectre/meltdown/etc vulnerabilities unpatched, which LITERALLY HALVES THE SPEED.
Why does Jow Forums constantly forget this fact?

New benchmark, 5ghz, still winning

Attached: Cine r20 8700k 5ghz.png (1042x1929, 110K)

You have to be trolling. This test was running 4GHz all core boost. I'm a lazy nigger and haven't touched any manual overclocking

Attached: autistic-test-meme.png.jpg (352x618, 68K)

post single core

How can I find Ryzen 3 2300X?

>LITERALLY HALVES THE SPEED
lol cope harder

Continuing to fight battles you've already lost will be the end of you and your kin schlomo. You'll never win hearts and minds, you're universally loathed throughout space and time, so here's some free advice - consolidate your considerable resources and go live on the moon - there's nobody there to exile you!

I have something to say. It's better to burn out, than to fade away. There can be only one!

HEEEERE WE ARE!
BORN TO BE KINGS!
WE ARE PRINCES OF THE UNIVERSE!

youtube.com/watch?v=8e3W6jaUiq0

You beat me alittle. I was getting 4.3 GHz for the entire test

Attached: more-autism.png.jpg (364x236, 23K)

Ironically all the people I know who bought Ryzen, except 1, hate it. Said it's slow as fuck and drops to even 15 fps at times and wished they got Intel. They had no idea about RAM speeds, and we're probably running it at 2133mhz. I feel this is what most people would be doing. So AMD need to get to work on lowering latency fast.

Please, can anybody help me?