It's that time again

It's that time again.
acid3.acidtests.org/
Post em

Attached: untitled.png (651x440, 29K)

What's up with this? I also got 97

firefox?

>To pass the test, a browser must use its default settings
so this thread is useless

100/100

-sent from my iPhone

This test is deprecated btw, it won't get 100 on Chromium or Gecko

To see what tests you failed, click the "A" in acid (or shift-click it to open in a new window)

>iPhone 4S gets 100/100
>OnePlus 3T gets 97/100
Ok. iPhone using Safari and tried both chrome / Firefox on OP3T.

>you should not see this at all
Based

Is this a fingerprinting resistance test, or a standards compatibility test, or what?

Attached: 2019-03-08_13-48-27.png (668x446, 37K)

I got the best score possible
>Scripting must be enabled to use this test.

i7-3770k with 16GBs of RAM on Firefox.

Step up :^)

Attached: Capture.png (655x444, 29K)

Attached: Firefox 56.0a1.png (671x792, 256K)

It's an old standards compatibility test from back when IE7 was popular. Modern versions of Chrome and Firefox don't get 100/100 on default settings though, and the test is really old, so it's considered obselete these days.

Edge and safari does get 100, iirc.

Firefox and Chrome users cucked

Attached: lmao.png (684x558, 32K)

So is this normal?

Attached: screenshot.png (440x278, 9K)

Honestly, IE9 wasn't bad like the older versions, and IE11 was a good browser when Windows 8.1 released. All it needed was better extension support and it could've taken on Chrome and Firefox. It's just that it took too long for MS to make IE9, and by the time they had released it, everyone was already making the switch to Chrome. Also, IE9 dropped support for Windows XP when it released, while Chrome 11 didn't.

Get on my level faggots

Attached: 2019-03-08-155541_679x322_scrot.png (679x322, 35K)

>By April 2017, the updated specifications had diverged from the test such that the latest versions of Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox no longer pass the test as written.
Test hasn't been relevant for 2 years

Attached: 9283509.jpg (1024x768, 112K)

This

>nightly
>from 2017

Attached: 1532735098246.png (612x491, 106K)

Attached: int.jpg (1627x853, 174K)

Do standards really matter when web devs simply write for the most popular browsers?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-09 The Acid3 Test.png (644x433, 30K)

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-08 The Acid3 Test.png (1510x715, 62K)

I stopped updating as soon as they got rid of the old add-on API, i have too many useful addons that can't be recreated with the new one.

You should run the latest stable version or ESR version at the very least, you're missing even more security updates by using a nightly release.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-08-11-13-50.png (1080x1920, 70K)

Attached: Capture.png (639x413, 25K)