Which do you prefer? Programming or scripting?

Same with Sasha Grey. Hot as fuck, but the ONLY way to watch her is muted. Jesus fuck that dumb whore never shuts the fuck up.

That's Angela White for me. Her whole personality is a meme.

What even is the difference? A script is small and interpreted, a program is big and compiled?

the only girl I've found who's good at talking dirty is Cindy Starfall. The accent is a bonus.

I really hate how "dirty talk" has degraded into just repeating "fuck" as loud as possible for an actual hour.
>oh yeah fuck me, fuck me!
>fuck me in my pussy
He is fucking you, shut up.

A program is interactive. A script runs to completion without additional input. Compiled/interpreted has nothing to do with it.

>bananas aren't fruits though
Ironically, that's in the same sense that scripting isn't programming.
So false actually. Bananas are fruit because their the seed bearing part produced after flowering. Bananas are berries and berries are a subset of fruit..

Scripting is creative. Programming is just handiwork.

Does that mean cd, ls, mkdir, and the like are scripts?

>Angela White
Programs don't need to be interactive.
Scripts are allowed to request input.
Scripts are a subset of programs but not a very good definition of them.

Strictly, a script is a series of instructions in sequence.
A program is any kind of stored instruction for a computer, including a script but also including configuration data and even formatting markup. Writing HTML is a subset of programming.

Once you store it in a file to run on demand then yes, it's a script.

#!/bin/bash
cd /tmp

Would you argue against that being a bash script?

>tfw ex-gf looked exactly like Alina Li with longer hair

Total nympho, fucked 6 to 8 times a day like it was her one and only mothafuckin lifeline

So cd is a script because it can be run from a script. Does that make firefox a script because I can run firefox from a script?

I'd say the dividing line is that a script's primary operations are invoking other programs, while a program does more local operations of its own as opposed to calling pre-existing utility programs.

In order for a language to be considered programming, there has to be turing completion.

>wuts goin on itt?
script -> interpretated
program -> compiled
Yes I watch too much porn but this is weird.

Absolutely correct. why get some stupid gun tattoo to appear "gangster". i wish she didn't stop desu

kimchi and pusy smell

bash ftw

thank you, botany side of Jow Forums

Such a pedantic distinction. Are you telling me as soon as my script asks me if I want to do this or that, it magically becomes a program? Either way it's just a series of coded instructions.

>Such a pedantic distinction.
Programming languages themselves are very pedantic and nitpicky. If you have to be 100% specific with what you want, or else it won't understand you.

>at least with classic languages like c and assembly, this is the case. don't know much about the newer languages.

True, but I've never told the compiler whether what I was writing was a program or a script. Seems like it's a semantic distinction, not a technical one, or at least not a technical distinction that matters, in my view. In my work I've never thought about the difference between the two, I just wrote whatever was needed.

>True, but I've never told the compiler whether what I was writing was a program or a script.
Compilers are traditionally specific to whatever language you're writing in.

>Seems like it's a semantic distinction, not a technical one, or at least not a technical distinction that matters, in my view.
It's a functionality and capability distinction based on Alan Turing's theories.

I'm rather leaning on 's definition of it

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness

Though it goes over the heads of most people.

Bananas is a herb.