WinRAR or 7-zip?

7zip, except there's an odd problem where I can open an audio file from a rar archive just fine if foobar isn't running yet, but as soon as foobar is already running when I try the same thing it'll say it can't find the file. So if I wanna skip through a downloaded album without unpacking it I have to close foobar between every track. Wasn't an issue with WinRAR.

.ISO
Get fucked
Based & Redpilled
Back to Prove me wrong
>pro tip: you can't
/thread

unrar

Don't you have to pay for Winrar? I downloaded 7zip years ago and it does the job, why bother with anything else?

Whatever the fuck is used when I click "Compress..." in Nautilus.

bandizip on Windows for sure

7zip is b&rp

Literally same thing

>free (as in freedom) libre software or icky proprietary shareware
hmmmm what could the answer be?
Nautilus just links to File Roller, a GTK3 application. For example, Xubuntu, by default, includes File Roller but uses Thunar, as the file manager, and works identically to the typical GNOME DE setups of Nautilus and File Roller . Please excuse the pedantry.

Attached: 1478831153654.png (1500x2085, 3.08M)

LHarc.

Attached: 165468746877.jpg (240x240, 4K)

Attached: 1552095013681.png (645x773, 49K)

xarchiver

Winrar has more powerful batch processing options. Like "compress each selection as an individual archive."

Winrar, because I would never use a product made by someone with the name of (((Igor Pavlov)))

extractnow

seven zipomatic technologik, teknologic.

7zip
Free
Can unzip most of compressed files

>not using PeaZip
and you guys call yourself tech professionals LMFAO

7z format
ark for GUI program

Winrar, for it' s free.

>*crack* *sip*
LHArc. now that was a compression program

wait, people still use winrar?

7zip cli (GNU+Linux)

spbp

Winrar is somewhat faster
7-zip has better compression and is free
So 7-zip

Some people on Jow Forums still use XP lol

both. 7-zip for backup

bros, we really should buy copies of winrar, they so deserve it

so is 7zip

This.

PeaZip >>>>>>> all others.

why are the seventeen gorillion different archival/compression algorithms, systems, methods?
why do ~3-4 dominate on win, and 2-3 on gnu/linux os's?

Winrar (paid version)

>not just renaming file extensions to .zip for the ultimate lossless compression

Attached: 5d4b97ab80429271306d0d23.jpg (256x256, 14K)

tar -lzma

pkarc

But you can just write a script to do that with 7zip, wintoddler.

Is the 7-zip encryption still secure?

you don't have to compress. i have bunch of small files in zip archives so they don't fragment my hdd.

both russian/ukrainian
literally no difference

Linux

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (250x248, 15K)

7-zip

Eventhough i still have working keys for Winrar from some Russian/Chinese banks since 2004

Peazip is the only correct answer.

Based user of Yevgeny Lazarevich Roshal's masterpiece

Peazip

>not xz

lrzip with zpaq
anything else is worthless

I purchased a winRAR key after my first trial ended, so I stick with it. 7-zip is still good though.

obviously winrar just for the convenience of having the "extract all archives to a different folder" context menu item.

cpio with lz4

>winrar is a dumb shitty program that lets you use it even though it costs money

>zoomer doesn't know what shareware is

>not using ARJ

I bet more people bought winrar or total commander this way than if they just ceased to function after the trial period expired and you had to buy them so they work again.
The best proof is that both software are on the market since fucking forever.

>Winrar
>rreg.key
>flateye theme