If you use Intel or AYYMD NO DRIVERS on Windows which are proprietary, kill yourself faggot
Luis Fisher
>If you use Intel or AYYMD NO DRIVERS on Windows which are proprietary, kill yourself faggot This is a mind corrupted by brand tribalism. Proprietary drivers should be illegal.
Jason White
>spend millions developing your hardware and drivers to go along with it >hurrrr just give it out for freeeeee
Jaxon Brown
Who said anything about free hardware?
Mason Robinson
Free drivers, which are included in the development cost of the overall project
Owen Myers
So include the driver development cost in the hardware price. Thousands of vendors seem to have no problem doing it.
You're paying for it when you buy the GPU, retard. What do you think funds the development of said drivers?
Alexander Thomas
You act like AMD GPU's were usable at all before they merged with mesa
Jason Mitchell
There are plenty of people that are more than willing to make those oh so expensive hardware drivers for fucking nothing. Just look at AMDs open source drivers they stomp their shitty windows ones.
Xavier Jackson
>give it out for freeeeee Who said open source drivers need to be given out for free? Open source does not mean you don't have to pay for it.
Henry Cooper
found the fucking communist
Zachary Sanders
>Who said open source drivers need to be given out for free? By giving everyone the source code you are essentially giving out for free all the research you poured a lot of money into
Easton Brooks
>.aspx So glad I'm not working there.
Grayson Rivera
Your autism should be illegal.
Thomas Perez
>willing to make those oh so expensive hardware drivers for fucking nothing
Search all the meaningful contributions on amd drivers, look who did them...
they're not doing it for free, they work for amd.
Ryan Rivera
This is a mind corrupted by brand tribalism. Proprietary drivers should be illegal.
Nathan Robinson
Not an argument. I'm not defending any specific brand when I make the point that companies should have a right to do with their own drivers what they please.
Colton Reyes
Also why should they be illegal?
David Martin
Non-free drivers usually have built-in planned obsolescence, which is harmful to the environment. Many perfectly good devices are wastefully discarded because nobody but the manufacturer can update the drivers.
Real-life shadows aren't razor sharp for everything.
Isaac Perez
In certain scenes it looks virtually identical and cuts fps in half The draw distance is literally dog shit and looks worse than the games software version of distance shadow cascades/umbra
RTX is a meme. You lose half the FPS for prettier shadows.
Jeremiah Johnson
And what's the problem with that if you won't lose a cent of profit since everyone has to pay to use them anyway?
Carter Lee
Competitors learn your secrets for free while you spend millions in research
Parker Smith
whats the difference between these imgs
Xavier Carter
That sure has fucked up a lot of open source commercial products! Hasn't it?
Juan Williams
I don't see what Nvidia stands to gain from giving away tech they poured millions into developing.
Oliver Robinson
If both AMD and NVIDIA open sourced their drivers they could benefit from each others research, in addition to contributions from the community.
Blake Hill
Yeah and if everyone just got along with each other we wouldn't need police anymore. How fucking naive are you?
Sebastian Jenkins
If it works for everything else why can't it work for GPU drivers?
Elijah Clark
AMD has ALREADY open sourced most of their drivers and somehow they're still in business.
Ethan Rodriguez
That's my point. Most of the research goes into the GPU architecture anyway which can't be "stolen" by competitors.
Levi Edwards
That's because NVIDIA/CUDA is the de-facto system for GPU computing, and NVIDIA generally does a lot more interesting R&D that they need to fund somehow (self driving cars, neural network image processing, TensorRT, etc)
Cameron Parker
see Most open sourced projects aren't sinking this much money into actual R&D
Gavin Watson
Customers.
Ethan Mitchell
This is literally hairworks 2.0, but even less noticable.
Ah yes, I'm sure the people who constantly whine about muh open sores will definitely start buying Nvidia overnight
Joseph Morales
This is a mind corrupted by brand tribalism. Proprietary drivers should be illegal.
Evan Collins
>self driving cars, neural network image processing, TensorRT How about they keep these proprietary so no one can "steal" them and open source the consumer drivers? What exactly would they lose by this?
Ryder White
Blender cycles performance increase is usefull
Angel Diaz
>open sores You almost make it sound like open source is a bad thing.
Wyatt Torres
Stop repeating yourself and actually explain your reasoning you deluded faggot
Noah Brown
Nouveau drivers have trash performance. Of course I don't trust hobbyists and amateurs with making drivers.
Jordan Flores
It's not, but the people naively whining about why massive corporations aren't adhering to their idealist fantasies are annoying as fuck.
Bentley Robinson
>which are included in the development cost Because it is impossible for third parties to do the work for them. These are consumer chips used to play games and watch high resolution video, not advanced supercomputing hardware. Almost all of the money goes into the hardware, the driver packages are secondary to that. NVIDIA would literally make money from free software, it wouldn't be done out of kindness.
Noah Lewis
Yeah, why make your own in-house drivers where the devs can directly communicate with the hardware division and are beholden to their managers and shareholders? Nvidia should just wait a few years for some greasy NEETs to make sub-par drivers for them, provided the project team doesn't disband from personal falling-outs in the meantime. I'm sure the shareholders would be delighted.