Warn my sister about the dangers of the botnet

>copied the wrong link and sent my sister the edward snowden wikipedia page
>3 days later she's using arch and browsing the web on a tails vm
should I tell her he's not real?

You're assuming I'm the same person, and that I don't support your stance. Stop being so hostile and come up with better arguments. I can do it for you if you can't.

lol, no one is ever going to share that online, actually when you are browsing social networks you only share what you want, and collecting that data is on their EULA, shit argument.

If she has nothing to hide, I demand photos of bobs and vagana

I feel bad for her for having such an insufferable cunt as a brother desu.

>It's not hard to come up with compelling arguments for privacy
What are some examples? Not trying to say that you're wrong, I'm genuinely interested in hearing compelling arguments.

will you read all that shit?
if you're not doing fake purchases in my name, aka stealing, I have no problem in showing you my emails

mating-press-mindbreak her

You privacytards are fucking idiots for taking everything to the extreme and treating privacy as something binary. It doesn't have to be either full privacy or no privacy. I choose what information I share and with whom.

of couse she is, she's addicted to it, the corporate suits have your sister around their little finger

Based schizo.

um
oh you do choose that eh
so you got source code for all your applcations
on all your operating systems
on all your devices
down to the firmware that boots it?
like librebooted pc or lineageos phone
exclusively?
and you have fully read and fully comprehend (ie in legalese) the tos of every applciation you have ever instaled or web service you have requested?
you got all that going for you and your choice this morning was to say the word 'privacytard'?

I like the quote by Snowden that saying privacy doesn't matter because you have nothing to hide is like saying free speech doesn't matter because you have nothing to say.

Really, privacy limits power. An entity that can inspect any aspect of your life can influence your reputation and decisions. To say you have nothing to hide, you have to make the ridiculous assumption that you're completely perfect. Even then, "perfect" can't really be defined. If you hold opinions that go against the grain of society, you probably wouldn't want to let just anyone know that, lest you be shunned by society. But who's to say if you or society are right in their opinions?

Of course, if someone is just saying they don't care that Facebook knows their interests and activity, then that's fine. However, that's also their decision. Privacy is a personal liberty, and I think it's silly to say that liberty should be denied because someone thinks they have nothing to withhold. Really, an entity should have to justify accessing your information rather than you having to justify preventing them from doing so. If they're just grabbing at as much of your information as possible, then it should be criticized, even if the intent isn't malicious. If society and government were to actually take the "nothing to hide" argument seriously, then it would have serious implications on personal thought, speech, and security. Security is honestly a better word than privacy I think. It's a better description of what the issue is actually about.

I think just saying "if you think privacy doesn't matter, then give me your bank info" is honestly a terrible argument. Allowing someone to steal your possessions and allowing the degradation of your ability to control information aren't really the same thing. And to someone that just doesn't care how much Google tracks them, they're going to find that argument completely nonsensical.

Hopefully something in that mental diarrhea sounds a bit compelling.

No, but I can tell you my email provider, my bank and when I usually use them. Do you want that?

Yo post pics

>be 2028
>the left have gone full crazy
>use Facebook and social media data to hunt anyone center or right leaning
>alt rights are imprisoned

You had this coming user

I'm not american.

Stupid frogposter.

She's got alot to hide m8 it is pretty much common knowledge by now all women in their teens years get fucked by dogs she probably got some of those videos getting knotted and thats illegal

If you have nothing to hide, show me your browser history.

Attached: 1515560283384.png (514x438, 20K)

What? Only I will know and I _swear_ I won't pass it around.
Probably won't correlate it with all the info I already have about you.
And definitely won't share stories about your weird browsing to my online friends, who may not know your name, but know what you fear, who you are in love with, what illnesses you suffer from

>security is privacy
based retard

sure thing lad

Attached: history.png (1280x800, 149K)

Shilling privacy to people when everything seems fine is hopeless. You have to wait for them to be personally caught in a data breach before you can convince them of anything.

>No, I don't watch porn.
>No, I don't read news.
>Yes, my whole life is dedicated to Debian.
No wonder you're on Jow Forums

Now stop being a pussy and show your whole history, from all browsers. Also from incognito modes (recreate it, or just ask Google).
Post it in it's entirety, and watch as folks come to sell you serum for feet fungus, or 20% off subscription to sissy-school.co
Du it.

>I don't do anything illegal or socially inappropriate so I have nothing to hide on social media platforms
>lol then give me all your emails and accounts n shit haha
what an absolute retard holy shit

>implying this would be a bad thing

>mom hears about faceberg privacy scandals in the news
>comes to me, concerned, asking about it
>"user, you mean facebook knows everything I do on my phone just because I have the app installed?"
>"they know all the websites I visit just because I have an account and I'm logged in?"
>"this is awful! How can I stop this, user?"
>"well, mom, for a start you need to stop using facebook on your phone, unsinstall the app, and stay logged out on your computer"
>"What? surely I don't have to go to that much trouble?!"
>"no, mom, that's just table stakes, that's what you start with if you don't want facebook knowing everything you do"
>"oh... well, I guess they're not THAT bad, I'm sure all this is overblown and I can trust them..."

This exact same sequence of events happened with Google, too. The moment she hears that she'll have to change her habits in the very slightest in the name of privacy, she rationalizes an excuse not to. She fundamentally doesn't want to accept that "free" ad-supported services are inherently spyware, even though she knows they are. Because, you see, that'd be inconvenient.

Most people are like this, sadly.

That's what "nothing" means genius. If you refuse to give out a single piece of information then you do have something to hide.

can't wait for the future

>just trying to use facebook
>autistic NEET older brother lecturing me on foot eating guy ricardo tallman again
UGH

I bet the Jews in Poland felt that way too

You know why people are still on FB? I wonder how many black guys your mom has blown.

>>>/reddit/