Attached: ibm_q_00.jpg (1100x615, 564K)
What do you think about quantum computers?
Kevin Richardson
Other urls found in this thread:
smbc-comics.com
ibm.com
vimeo.com
twitter.com
Charles Morales
that they dont work because quantum stuff is made to not work in stable conditions,
now they are trying to hybridize quantum stuff with normal binary and its slowly just becoming a normal computer as they realize that you cannot force qubits to do anything
Dominic Edwards
Is it a story when using the superconducting method?
If we can find a way to realize quantum gates stably, it would be hopeful.
For example, microsoft uses topological insulators as a way to realize quantum gates.
Jordan Jackson
its slowly just becoming a simulated quantum computer running like a normal binary one
Owen Gutierrez
Substitute the word "bullshit" for every occurrence of "quantum" and suddenly things become clearer.
Jacob James
For example, it is Fujitsu's Digital Annealer using pseudo-annealing method ?
Bentley Lewis
No. Just no. There is no "quantum" anything, this isn't poorly understood near magic effects of some mythical theoretical particle. This is simply electrons being so small they can move through any material at the path of least resistance, because nothing can exert 100% perfect electrical control over them. It is current leakage. It is nothing but current leakage. It is current leakage in short channel devices, and it happens at literally every feature size, it is not exclusive to small FinFET devices like upcoming 5nm EUV FinFETs. Even planar devices have extremely high degrees of leakage through their channels, directly under the gates, electrons still leak out. Yet despite this the transistors still function.
Quantum tunneling is a meme regurgitated by people who know nothing about the field of FETs.
Jordan Hill
It's the future because it means really, really fast computers!
Liam Edwards
botnet
Nathan Taylor
an actual real quantum computer would need a 0.1 kelvin cold shell and for the "quantum qubits" to actually work by themselfs these small ass particles need to ltierally time travel back and fourth constantly as they collapse the wavefunctions lmao, im pretty sure we wont have 0 kelvin-timtravel boxes in our cases any time soon, its probably impossible
Benjamin Howard
he posted it again xD
Grayson Lewis
ITT Jow Forums shows they don't understand quantum computing while still feeling entitled to have a harsh and overly simple opinion
Andrew Allen
>time travel back and fourth constantly
I guess quantum state superposition is real, you can post on Jow Forums and be a retard at the same time, but the moment you click that "post" button, everything collapses and you're just a retard
Gabriel Kelly
Too theorical
smbc-comics.com
Jack Roberts
underrated post
Lucas Cooper
They're useful. Retards will spend their lives working on this shit, and leaving open positions to other useful stuff. Then everything will die, and they'll be unemployed, while I have a comfy job, a job they didn't do because they preferred to work on this bullshit
Carter Parker
Jack Campbell
They are mighty good grant chasing fodder.
Joseph Torres
Only correct answer
Isaac Hughes
>tfw every method of quantum computing turns out to be viable
William Cooper
They are the modern equivalent of vacuum-tube transistors and punch card mainframes. Useless today but will be a game changer in a few decades.
Christopher James
I think the HAL9000 was real 60's tech, so these must be Skynet tier.
Julian Phillips
Viable, yet completely useless for anything worthwhile.
Tyler Peterson
They don't exist, like sharks and aids. Have you ever seen a shark?
Charles Davis
Uh yeah, many. Have you not?
Austin Rogers
It looks like a chandelier on the inside!
Matthew Ward
What were these made to do to begin with? Let's get that clear.
Lincoln James
I hate them, how the fuck do they work?
Adrian Ramirez
Triple letter agency tools to break encryption.
Noah Mitchell
everyone calls it the chandelier at work
Owen King
There are certain tasks in which we can prove that there is a "quantum advantage" when compared to attempting the same computation on classical computers.
Shor's algorithm is the obvious use case, but needs lots of qubits. Actually, most use-cases you can think of, from combinatorial chemistry to monte-carlo rendering require a lot of qubits.
Fortunately there are some use-cases that do have a quantum advantage given few qubits.
ibm.com
Angel Carter
Unless you can play DOOM on it, I'm not interested.
Blake Baker
Magic, but downgraded into a room-sized component so people feel more familiar with what is ostensibly beyond computation.
Carter Wilson
given a large enough machine you probably could, at least you could perform raytracing on it.
vimeo.com
Cooper Morales
most of that stuff is isolation and refrigeration, since everything affects the output. it's missing the glass that's supposed to form a faraday cage too. the chip is super tiny.
Caleb Stewart
Total meme until they can combine 30 qbits or so.
Parallel computations are easy with graphics cards.
Jason Ross
>reading about superposition measuring
>they use fucking lasers and stretch atoms like play-doh
>somehow people think we're going to be using these soon
Christian Young
What? Leakage and quantum effects are not the same thing you retard
Wyatt Watson
PhD student in quantum information for 2 years reporting. I'm still very skeptical about them. Not even the machines, but the algorithms themselve. There just seems to be too much weird things going on.
Cooper Reyes
Breaks RSA
Jaxson Anderson
>unemployed
I don't think you know how research works.
But then again, I don't think anyone in this thread understands how literally anything works.
Ethan Martinez
Lol?
Michael Nguyen
Maybe okay
Noah Watson
Newfag
Levi Diaz
A waste of time unless we can harness quantum entanglement to eliminate internet lag.
Levi Allen
it is going to crack all current forms of encryption