128 bit operating systems when?

you can already get the linux kernel to use 128/256/512-bit avx instructions with appropriate compilation flags

Attached: dynamic-isa-simd.png (699x422, 10K)

we dont even need 64 bit

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V
today

>when
well they would be useful if we could miniaturize data servers to the point that one CPU could handle all the load meaning you need more space for memory but this is not happening...

good mouses for notebooks when?
>inb4 that retarded thinkpad red point crap

Attached: 1553304709809.jpg (900x900, 51K)

This desu, very little was gained in the grand scheme of things.

lol we won't need them until 2039. screenshot this post.

Why would you think that?

I can think of a few different use cases.
>if we developed a new kind of neural network capable of growing more complex as it learns
>if for some reason we ever wanted to centralize the entire internet
>if we wanted to run an atomic-precision simulation of a small universe

Imagine the fucking width of data buses required to facilitate 128-bit registers

HOLY SHIT

Attached: 1553719003354.png (400x400, 210K)

>not wanting a 2MB bit computer instead
What a waste

really user I just use my thumb and index on the pad and my ring and middle fingers for the buttons
there's more benefits to thinkpad's extra mouse buttons than just the clit mouse

>entirely possible, almost probable
>pointless
>inevitable

It will be quite complicated, in terms of the hardware. CPU will probably need new arch.
t. former intel fag who asked a tech lead that question

>64 bit systems
>only 48 bit addressing
we still don't even have a true 64 bit systems yet. given the shit in x86 ISA for compatibility reasons with old archs, making yet another larger extension would turn it into complete clusterfuck that no human would want to touch
there are 128 bit instructions if you need some

32 vs 64bit
I don't even know the difference

That is what people also said about 32 bit operating systems...

the progression is 64, 80, 96, 128 actually.

We don't need 4K video too, yet it's here already.

Name one consumer grade 48bit computer

4096 HBM Operating systems when?

Attached: a0da540f-27dc-4433-b10b-cb162a80bc38.jpg (640x480, 23K)

totally, i mean, who even cares about addressing more than 4 gigs of memory? performance improvements are just unnecessary. lets all use windows 95 and listen to shitty formulaic S O M E T H I N G W A VE for "aesthetics." everyone will totally think we are cool then.

What sound do Japanese sheep make?

64bit addresses are plenty of the foreseeable future, and we already have >64bit vector operations.

Baaaaaka

^___________________________^

32bit linux can address over 4gb ram you fucking monkey nigger.

We also have these things called wireless usb mice and touchpads.

Can you post the Ubuntu 18/19 version of the graphic

Yes with slow workarounds

the step from 32 to 64 didn't need intermediaries
the step from 64 to 128 is way more complex than 32-to-64
hell, every jump from here on is going to be a clusterfuck compared to how fucking candid the jump from 32 to 64 was

They are just so far behind. The Sega Dreamcast was 128 bit and came out years ago

Attached: 64bit.jpg (759x509, 57K)

It may STORE more with (like someone else said) slow work arounds, but it cannot ADDRESS more than 4GB you STUPID MONKEY NIGGER.

How do you address more than 4GB with 32 bits? Cmon retard. How many addresses are there with 32 bits...? HuuuuuuuuuuuRRRRRR DUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRrrrrrrr techmonolmogies is hard and maf is made by chinese and whites because day don like us gettin ahead

Wasn't X360 256 bit?

When intel manages to make a CPU that doesn't set itself on fire using AVX

Jeeeesus what a mongrel you do two cycle addressing

>128 bit cpu comes out
>arch drops x64 support
>mfw

Intel's planning 5 level paging with a 57 bit address bus

How do you think the garbage hardware like the 8-bit gameboy cpu addressed more than 256 bytes?

>he fell for the 16 exabytes of RAM meme

Attached: [HorribleSubs] Kono Yo no Hate de Koi wo Utau Shoujo YU-NO - 01 [720p]_00:16:47_06.jpg (1280x720, 105K)

they were not true 8 bit cpus. they had 16 bit addresses.

32 bit architectures are not the same. they are still 32 bit addressable

Can't wait to run the inevitable fork with x86_64 compatibility.

>2MB bit

Attached: 1551056535525.jpg (1024x768, 120K)

I hope you enjoy your 16+ exabyte memory.

What is she drinking?

nice face swap in that bottom left pic

Horse cum.

ubuntu will use 8 out of these 16 exabytes on idle

>128 bit operating systems when?
you have no clue about what you're asking for, if you had any idea you would have known how retarded your question is

64 bit CPUs are generally 48 bit anyway.

Exactly. 128-bit is possible right now but there's no money in it.

is that a double down?

A protein shake. Are you illiterate?

Attached: horse-semen-shots.jpg (400x266, 18K)

>higher = better

Attached: 1533496212416.png (645x729, 58K)

Except the gameboy had 8MiB ROM on some carts. How do you think they did this, hmm?
You can keep stacking bank selects until you can address all the memory you want. It's still addressing even if it's a little slower.

It'll be a long time until programs need to address more than 2^64 bits, retard

they already exist but both 128bit software and 128bit hardware are just research projects at this point.

there has been no need to advance 128bit architecture when we're able to do just fine with 64bit + specialized 128-512bit instructions (SIMD).

I want x32 to become popular instead. 99% of the users have no need for full 64bit support and x32 has been shown to improve cache locality due to reduced space needs.

128 bit address space have some advantages, not likely to outweigh the disadvantages.

At the current rate, it'll be a long time until programs need to address more than 2^48 bits, which is what we actually have for addressing right now. Last I checked 8gb of ddr4 ram still cost more than 8gb of ddr3 did when I bought it in 2011.

AVX is 64 bit units put in parallel though, so not true 128 bit and above. You can approximate it (>106 bit) with double double representation in the software though.

128 bit address space = 309485009821345068724781056 TiB addressable RAM, you can't afford it

This.

>t. former intel fag

Spill some beans on backdoors in Intel cpus.

Wasn't Sega Dreamcast 128 bit?

dumb thread
sage.

you dont need more than 64bit
its max for now or wait for 100-200 years when we need higher computing power for space exploration

Don't know any. Unironically learned about IME on Jow Forums

We already do. Even 256 and 512 bit instructions. Just not in the memory space.
Yes, they are very much used.

How come Jow Forums is such a retard when it comes to simple things like that?

bigger wordsize could mean bigger instruction size, meaning more memory needed ie cache is smaller

I can't believe they never got a workaround for more than 8gbs of ram on 32 bit Windows. How embarrassing!

Only on the encoder/decoder level, AVX has it's own part of the die that works with either 128, 256 or 512 bits directly.

>The Sega Dreamcast was 128 bit
The Sega Dreamcast used a 128-bit FPU.*
It was a 32-bit system.

>all the misuse of bits
>all the console faggotry
>all the retarded assumptions about old CPUs that are incorrect
>all the misunderstandings of addressing
>all the misconceptions about 32 bits
>all the cluelessness about instructions
I love Jow Forums.

Attached: 1554588810508.png (631x660, 556K)

despite being only 13% of the bits, 32 bits commit 50% of the crashes

The only benefits to 128-bit CPU's is the ability to carry out crypto calculations faster, nothing else deals with numbers big enough to make a difference, and we already have ASIC's for every crypto algorithm anyway, so it's literally pointless.

yea but do you really trust them?
They are not the actual arch people. They are just some random people that took the initiative to steal the name

Like fucking 16 byte pointers? Even 8 byte pointers can be bloat.

video gayms

(non-soft) sciences can make use of it

osti.gov/servlets/purl/860342

>he thinks memory is the only benefit of increased bits

KEK go back to /v/ brainlet.

I still useing 32 bit PC.

Fuck off miku is mine

Attached: a00a6e987934a7d8b8e3e5649bb155c6482ae09693f152347b85e67af3549b95.jpg (900x750, 225K)

I think the for now would be implied

macbook pro with touchbar

>he thinks higher CPU bitness is useful for *anything* other than memory addressing
>what is GPU/SSE/...

Why not 1024? Maybe the size and number of instruction words?

Isn't it obvious? 64-bit benchmarking software on a 64-bit OS on a 64-bit system with 2GiB of RAM will score better than a 32-bit benchmarking software on a 32-bit OS on the same system.