Holy fuck I didn't expect the file explorer in Linux to be this fucking shit...

Holy fuck I didn't expect the file explorer in Linux to be this fucking shit. Even Windows 98 explorer had more functionality than this garbage.

Attached: nautilus-in-ubuntu-18.04.jpg (1280x752, 112K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285711
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Literally what the fuck are you talking about

use KDE

But unlike windows, you can use ANOTHER file explorer.
Just do like everyone here and use KDE.

Get nemo instead

>there's no address bar that you can type a path into
literally unforgivable

Just look at that bar at the top of the window. How many fucking icons are there. Oh, noo, is that a hamburgler menu to the right? Hahahaha. Holy shit.

>the file explorer
>the
>singular
What the fuck are you going on about?

Attached: 1453303001612.png (700x700, 362K)

>But unlike windows, you can use ANOTHER file explorer.
>But unlike windows
are you stupid?

Attached: 1516470286151.jpg (1440x900, 58K)

What the fuck do you need from a file manager?

a functional fucking address bar? Is that so much to ask?

use thunar mook

>falling for this kind of bait
weak

>no thumbnails
>can't use different folder views on different folders

>he fell for the loonix meme

Attached: 1534284013190.jpg (1200x1000, 677K)

Imagine being the kind of autist that install total commander on windows though

Ctrl+L

spamming the "ubuntu is so slow" threads times a week didn't work so you came up with a new excuse eh?

>not based freecommander

>GNOME
>Ubuntu

OP really IS a faggot!

>Holy fuck I didn't expect the file explorer in Linux to be this fucking shit. Even Windows 98 explorer had more functionality than this garbage.

Attached: trash.png (96x30, 3K)

You have more than one way and more than one program to browse files. Command line, terminal file browsers, gui file browsers, etc.

this is the worst fucking bait ever
sage and move on

So is it finally ok to admit that most graphical file explorers in linux are shit?

>he doesn't use a real desktop, such as KDE or Xfce
>he's using IBM Gnome(TM)

Attached: Desktop Environments_major DEs only.png (2281x831, 189K)

Imagine being autistic enough to use Linux as a daily driver.

You should be aware that Nautilus (the default file explorer in Ubuntu) is much maligned by the Linux community and you can decide to install and use another one

>can't use different folder views on different folders
Really? Nautilus too? What's up with file manager devs being so scared about this functionality?

Why does this shit distro run worse than Windows 10?

Linux is bad

/thread

The power of Gnome shell

>I was just pretending to be retarded!!

Ubuntu did lock Gnome's frame rate to 30 to hide the choppy animations.

linux outside of servers and dev environments is fucking retarded
and even then you should just be sshing in lol

I can't afford a Mac, sorry.

t. soidev

>THE file explorer
this is your mistake, retarded sir.

There is a canonical file explorer, it's called the shell. Literally nothing easier and more powerful than ls and cd'ing your way across a filesystem with system utils at hand.

Press Windows+L.

> and dev environments
I can agree with that. I don't think normie users should be using linux.
The problem is the faggots who are too lazy to use linux and yet call themselves "programmers" or "developers" and instead use macOS.

Also this is written from my fresh hackintosh install as I was testing out macOS for the first time and I must say it's the biggest piece of shit I've ever seen. It's like a fake linux I feel so dirty I had to type commands such as "diskutil diskPartition" what the fuck.

So why is Ubuntu 18.04 lacking in so many features but at the same time using more resources than fucking Windows 10 of all OSes?

>using Linux
>not iteration over your files with grep and bash

Go buy a Mac you retard

Attached: 653D29F7-E3AF-47C7-ABE3-FF39B3DA7BA1.jpg (426x282, 108K)

Can you install dolphin on gnome?

You can use every file manager with every DE. How good the experience will be is a different story though.

>install ubuntu
>dont now how to use bash
>complain about shitty functionality
Fuck you

yes, but it is going to install a shit load of dependencies

This. Installing pcmanfm is pretty much the first thing I do on a fresh install. Files is only useful for it's use with Firefox.

>Files is only useful for it's use with Firefox.
What do you mean?

It's what opens up when you download shit and go to the file from the browser.Filepicker, too.

Due to dependencies you need to install all of Plasma. Better just go with KDE overall.
I tried to install Dolphin on Ubuntu Gnome once, but I just couldn't get thumbnail previews working. Switched to KDE and never looked back.

Nautilus is an absolute piece of shit.
Install Kubuntu. Dolphin is the best file explorer for Ganoo+Loonix

Attached: 1554119456371.jpg (640x483, 62K)

I was ready to write how you can use your default file manager to open download destinations, but as it turns out I'm just a lucky bastard with Firefox using Nemo instead of Nautilus as intended.
bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285711

gnome as default in ubuntu is driving away more new users than ever before.

This pizza knows things.

Nautilus is a giant piece of shit just like almost everything in gnome.

>in Linux
you mean the gnome desktop environment? install a different de/file browser you fucking retard

>Dolphin
>Silently corrupts your files on transfer

Very true. I tried all the popular file managers listed on Arch Wiki and they're all shit in one way or another.

None of the freetard file managers have the functionality of Windows 10 File Explorer or the elegance design of macOS mojave Finder