Who here still on sandybridge or haswell?

Never Obsolete™

Attached: X230%201.jpg (3858x2894, 3.07M)

4460. I'm an overclocking autist so let me tell you that it hurts.
Fell for the waiting forever meme.

Attached: 1486791253589.jpg (528x480, 37K)

i5 2410M, still waiting for something less impressive

pineview

Attached: 1920.jpg (1920x1080, 548K)

4790 in desktop. Sandy bridge i7 in laptop

3770k here. Still going strong.

Aquí

Attached: Sin título.png (849x602, 36K)

>i5 2310
Works perfectly in optimized games, not bottlenecking my 1070
Works like shit in any game that's very cpu intensive or badly optimized like apex, pubg, battlefield or escape from tarkov

dual x5680 reporting in

Attached: Screenshot_20190421_113524.png (588x286, 131K)

4670k GANG

2500k, 3770, and 2690 v2 reporting in

Attached: 1523716681700.jpg (826x1200, 738K)

11 years have passed

Attached: 920.jpg (800x745, 95K)

I'm on Skylake? I think. I have the 6800k whatever that one is

Of course Satan would choose the biggest meme processor to ever exist

Yep, I use a an X220 with and X230 motherboard in it. Love this thing.

>I use a X220 with a X230 motherboard

Attached: 1492607426755.jpg (800x1200, 719K)

I'm on Lynnfield.

5930k @ 4.6 here.

No plans on "upgrading"

xeon e3-1231v3 here

4770k as well. Not going to upgrade for a good while longer

This and 4570.
Never obsolete.

on 7700k planning to upgrade to zen 2 if good

3570k here, upgrading to ayyymd with 3rd gen ryzen

Three IvyBridge i7's reporting in

i7-5820K here. Still an excellent chip

Same. Will upgrade the coming winter.

4810-MQ reporting in

2600k died along with mobo a few days ago pass me the rope pls
"""temporarily""" using G4600 and it's draining the life out of me.

2600k in desktop, 4790 or 4770 in a Dell 9020 I use with TeamViewer only as a """"server""""

8750H or whatever the hell it is in my laptop because I'm retarded and keep falling for the "what if I need to run solid works or NX past midnight when the engineering labs close but then it doesn't matter because I can run a virtual machine through my school" meme

How'd you manage that?

THIS MOUSE MEME IS SPREADING FROM Jow Forums TO Jow Forums AHHHHH NONONONO

Attached: C9808EBF-85EC-4467-9515-498096AF77FB.png (1080x1076, 560K)

i3-3220 reporting it. Anything more powerful is a waste of energy.

Reporting

Attached: xeon.png (1324x857, 176K)

bulldozer still rocking in

2600k reporting in

Got Ryzen 1200 for muh office PC instead of i3-2100. Clearly an improvement for both performance and power consumption.

Got a beautiful 2600k overclocked to a stable 5ghz here.

Fucking great CPU.

I was just repasting this bad boy.

Attached: 20190413_191450.jpg (4032x3024, 3.16M)

>2600K

Truly a great processor. I almost went with a 2500 back in the day but I'm so fucking glad I bet on having hyper threading.

Feels comfy. Only upgrades I did was scrapping a spare battery, scrapping an extra 4gb of ram from a similar machine no one uses in this house, and replace the HDD with an SSD

Attached: 2019-04-21-214610_1366x768_scrot.png (1366x768, 295K)

Yeah, whatever they did to manufacture the 2600k must have had really great yields. Everyone I know who has one has been able to get some great overclocking out of them.

i3-2310m reporting in.
after all these years it's still really good compared to the fucking celerons the put in cheap laptops nowadays

Also another 2600k here.

Easily the best processor of this decade.

Had to do minimal upgrades, like scrapping some ram and putting an SSD in there, but the comf is real

Attached: 2019-04-21-214610_1366x768_scrot.png (1366x768, 291K)

Guys, is it worth upgrading from a 2500K to a 4C8T Xeon E3 for another two years or so? Do Xeons overclock well?

Keep in mind that it was released back when I7's meant something.

They would be equivalent to I9's nowadays.

>Ryzen 1200
The only problem is the lack of onboard graphics.

i5 4670K, 16GB ram, and gtx760 here, runs great

>tfw i7-2600

It's not like Intel HD could've run 4K and 1080p or triple 1080p, so it's ok to have a dedicated card.

>I almost went with a 2500 back in the day but I'm so fucking glad I bet on having hyper threading.

I know this feel.

I remember people telling me back in the day that hyper-threading wouldn't be a thing for years and to just save money at get a 2500.

Holy hell was it worth the extra couple hundred of dollars. It aged wonderfully and threading became far more important faster than anyone expected.

i5 3579k here

This cpu will still be good in 10 years

Does it really make that much of a difference though? Aren't double the threads just a 10-20% improvement in most applications?

4690K, 8GB DDR3 and 970 here
gonna get rid of this crap once zen2 and navi launches

Depends on application. Certain programs really got sizable improvements once they got patched to handle threading.

I bought a lot of new stuff when Haswell was current, and have upgraded it during the years

Now my household has three haswell systems with some 40 GB of ddr3 ram between them, and I don't feel like upgrading because I'd have to buy my memory all over again

4670k with 1080Ti on a 165Hz 1440p monitor, JUST bottleneck my shit up fampai

That's fair. I only use one low res monitor.

>crap

Attached: pathetic.jpg (700x483, 39K)

Keep in mind the 2700k wasn't originally planned and was more of a victory lap after how well the 2600k sold and preformed.

The 2600k was originally produced as the top of the line i7 for its era and it damn well shows.

since I play games on my PC it is crap since newer ones barely run at 60fps
sorry im not a codemonkey like you

What's bottlenecking what?

Well I can say from having task manager open I can see the hyper™threads© kick in occasionally, but doing NX, handbrake, fileoptimizer all the threads get used

Laptop has Haswell ULT, works on my machine™.

the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU obviously you silly dum dum

I7 4790k and i7 4700mq reporting here.

I was asking because I'm using an OC 2500K with a 970 and I haven't really noticed anything so far, so I would've been suprised if a 4670K bottlenecked a 1080 Ti. If I can throw something at my 970 the 2500K will just as easily handle it.

are you me

Just werks

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-04-21 23-23-26.png (828x396, 68K)

you realize that the 1080Ti is at least twice as powerful as the 970 with almost triple the memory. It is bottlenecking hard in my case.

>165Hz
Why?

Actually I use my 4690k pretty much only for gaming.
And desu I kinda do understand why you would want to upgrade if you like to play games and have some money to spare. This still does handle pretty much anything you throw at it at 1080p 60fps but I wouldn't even dare to try 144 on this.

because i can? i mean the screen is advertised at 144 Hz but it has an overclock option, so why not?

>minty
cute

I'm kinda drunk and not sure where that desu came from.

Probably reduces the lifetime and I have my doubts that you can feel any difference.

I used to be so, but I upgraded to Ryzen

>Probably reduces the lifetime
who gave grandpa access to Jow Forums?

newfags pls go desu senpai

I also realized afterwards that the 4670K is a 4C4T processor, so if anything only slightly better than my 2500K.

let's just cry and wait for zen 2 together.

Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4690 CPU @ 3.50GHz
reporting in, equipped with 32GB of RAM

I have to admit that I am a newfaq too. Been lurking imageboards since around 2010 but never Jow Forums.

I think AMD are making a mistake already announcing Zen 3 so early for only a year later than Zen 2, because now I'm thinking "I could buy Zen 2 but I've held out for so long and if I wait another year Zen 3 will be even faster". Do they want me to buy Zen 2 or not?

> is it worth upgrading from a 2500K to a 4C8T Xeon E3 for another two years or so?
Maybe, if you are into VT-d. I don't know how your 2500K overclock compares against E3-1230.
> Do Xeons overclock well?
They do not, except up to their turboboost value. Nehalem-based Xeons are OCable, with Sandy Bridge Intel cut that away for every model except K. Well, you can gain a bit with BCLK, but it's negligible. anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/3

i can't wait another year with this stutterfest of a CPU.

thats gonna be a big desu for me

Attached: 42906EB4-68E6-4025-8957-D04F537EFBB2.png (388x306, 97K)

I use 144Hz with 4770k and play lots of games at great fps. I am not interested in AAA titles like battlefield though.

Wait, I always thought Xeons were like K-processors, and now you're telling me Xeons are like non-K-processors?

pre 2012 games maybe, your CPU shows horrible min 0.1% and 1% performance at newer stuff, hence the stutter.