Is this how slow copying large amounts of data from drive to drive is?

Is this how slow copying large amounts of data from drive to drive is?

Attached: 1531537649839.png (416x261, 37K)

That looks like usb 2.0 speeds

Physical or logical drive? For two physical drives this is unacceptable.

Depends on the drives, of course. Those look like USB2 speeds.

no

Depends on the drives, the files, and how they're connected to the system.


If local transfer over SATA3 7200RPM HDDs, that's pretty shit

If it's a transfer over older 5400RPM drives, depending on the files you're transferring that could be acceptable.

Its over USB 3.0. The backup drive is external, I;m coping data from the internal storage drive: 0

Attached: 1545863389373.png (1074x259, 34K)

>USB 3.0
the connector might be usb3, but the link speed might not be. use a shorter cable and untangle it.

Wow, you have large disks... How big is your meme folder?

Attached: CoGv9RhXYAE11TM.jpg (851x584, 43K)

I think ill Just buy 2 fourteen TB hard drive. The eternal drive is probably shit

4U

cp -v
or if you must be a clicklet, copyhandler or richcopy

What’s untangling going to do? It’s electrixity it doesn’t matter

>not fast copy

Why are you such a stupid idiot?

What the fuck why do you have so many drives? Nobody needs 6TB of data

What the fuck are you storing? Porn?

>he likes his ugly Japanese software

Kek

>form over function

I’m being serious

It's limited by your upload rate to microshaft servers

xD
>magnetic field has nothing to do with electricy
you made my day

Do a tangled vs untangled test right now to prove it has any effect at all on USB transfer rates.

low quality bait

>Medium sized movie collection
>A couple seasons of GoT
>Large sized music collection
>Small comic book collection
>Medium audio book collection
And its gknr

Gone*

>Nobody needs 6TB of data
Hmm

Attached: drives.png (544x216, 15K)