Pixel Geometry

What is the best pixel geometry, subpixel geometry, and color set?

Attached: 1556834744652.jpg (1024x683, 670K)

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/dp/B00004YNSR
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>raster fags

Excuse me?

red/green/violet
1px is square
1subpx = 1/3.3(3) of the square
horizontally laid
480ppi
fite me

1nanometer pixels
Circular
Cyan, magenta, yellow

Whatever looks best to you. Who cares what autists say

I actually like shadow mask

pentile

>violet
Wh-what?

>he doesn't know

Attached: 1540706313266.png (1267x785, 99K)

Imagine not using vector monitors

>2019
>still using RGB
You should use RGBW

Attached: huawei_p8-4.jpg (600x329, 77K)

Pentile

My CRT doesn't have this problem.

But CRT limited to 480i and no digital input.

Some CRTs can go up to 1080p, like the one John Carmack used.

Attached: john_Carmack_working.jpg (468x332, 18K)

>But CRT limited to 480i
What? There were like 2 or 3 1440p CRTs.

LCD pushed back monitor technology by a decade senpai
We had 1080p+ resolutions, high refresh rates, true blacks, perfect contrast, good viewing angles etc. before lcds took over and took away everything.

Doesn't CRT cause eye cancer?

Y not CMYK?

1280x1024 and 1024x768 were the most common resolutions in 1999. Pretty sure 1600x1200 was common by 2004 and that 1920x1440 was possible on some CRTs back then.

but not all of those combined. Higher res would mean lower refresh rates.

Also a 19" was fuckheavy, I can't imagine what a 27" would weigh.

I can imagine however how awesome a 27" 2560x1440 144Hz would look as a CRT.

Monitor technology isn't evolving nearly fast enough. Where are our microled monitors.

Imagine carrying CRT in your pocket.

haha, imagine not having a 300dpi x 60fps color laser printer

You'll get a fucked up system where the sum of the primaries does not equal the max brightness. Awful.

Square, no subpixels, RGBCY in field sequential color mode.

They're all memes.

Attached: pixels.jpg (1502x930, 483K)

Attached: ips03.jpg (550x345, 76K)

>You'll get a fucked up system where the sum of the primaries does not equal the max brightness. Awful.
[Citation Needed]
Just look at how Huawei is doing.
Better than the butn-in OLED

Use your head. in RGBW, the combined max brightness of R+G+B will be lower than maximum brightness. You have a choice of washing out the color gamut, or introducing a non-linearity to the system.

But why can I see the difference on my RGB monitor?

Attached: graveler face.png (824x402, 362K)

Red/green/cyan/violet 2x2 square.
More of the CIE horseshoe, plus not nuking your retinas with blue/violet photons just to display grayscale/desaturated colors.

>Higher res would mean lower refresh rates.
amazon.com/dp/B00004YNSR
75 Hz 1440p iirc. The lower refresh rate was a LCD problem like with the T221 being 48 Hz.

Lots of CRTs could do 1920x1440, but few of them had h-scan bandwidths high enough to drive usable refresh rates at that resolution (without interlacing at least), and no CRT/DAC combo had perfect timing/pixel stabilities at those settings either.

t. Iiyama VM Pro 510 owner

I've been meaning to pick up a 2048x1536 CRT. There's actually a nice one in use at my local job center, I've been meaning to offer to replace it with an LCD monitor

Attached: 1328712988808.jpg (240x292, 16K)

Is a joke

who cares?

It matters when you want to actually look at a screen. Some are monumental shit, like the type that uses those chevrons in the OP.

Are there any cmy monitors? If yes, why aren't they more common and if no, why not?

Apple did some work on one a decade ago. I don't think it went anywhere or I never heard of it again anyway.

Attached: rgbdelta.jpg (219x218, 26K)

>why not?
All digital devices assume sRGB primaries, there is no color management system embedded deep enough, and it would pointlessly decrease effective bit depth.