OH NO NO NO

Fake news.
Navi is GTX 1080 Ti performance for $250

I thought it was supposed to outperform the RTX 2080 Ti

Nah, you're confusing it with the future magic drivers for the Vega VII. It will definitely beat the 2080 Ti once AMD releases them

youtube.com/watch?v=Xg-o1wtE-ww

OH NO NO NO NO

Still better than the 90 threads about Firefox.

Zen2 better make up for this

Attached: ds.jpg (653x726, 138K)

youtu.be/xoLKgRfNKBo
6:40

Who said that?

BAHAHAHAHAHa
Navi 1660 level at 300W confirmed

Attached: AMDnogi.jpg (224x250, 10K)

Attached: 1552837001737.jpg (640x550, 53K)

Are ya drunk mate? He said 10% UNDER 980ti.
This is for the non-existent 480x/490.

The 480 is right on the money.

Attached: 1547747819686.png (396x408, 165K)

Please do the needful!

Attached: xyYhFMkeAXota8U3giTDJC.jpg (1280x720, 105K)

It doesn't need drivers, it needs Mantle.

Attached: World-War-Z-1920x1080-Vulkan-706x820.png (706x820, 126K)

If this is true Nvidia will definitely fuck us for at least the NEXT 2 YEARS.

Attached: 4133.jpg.png (256x192, 54K)

He said Poolaris10 ~10%slower than gtx1070 you fucking pajeet, it doesent matter how the called the card, he asured that the poo10 GPU would match a 1070

Attached: poo_in_the_GPU.png (1920x1080, 1.23M)

Amdoredtv BTFO

Imagine if it is true and that navi 60 CU cant beat Vega with 60CU.

How can AMD fuck up so badly every single time even tho they have had so much time to solve these issues. If navi fails then im forever going novidya. I just cant wait for the fuck ups upon fuckups.

> clocks higher than Vega
They're going to release hourefires again, aren't they.

duhhhh

youtube.com/watch?v=ckJIy0L7LHY

2x8 pins

AMD shills

HEY
LISTEN

Didn't hear that one, all i know they claim 1080/ti Performance for less money but according to
I think it will be a underperforming like the rx580 again

Navi better have something going for it. Probably more VRAM than the Nvidia counterparts since Nvidia always cheaps out on the VRAM. Navi 10 will possibly have 10-12GB of VRAM.

They still will be inferior shit with more vram, as always

I'd personally take an 8GB R9 390 over a 3.5GB GTX 970 any day, even though it consumes much more power.

>source my ass

based vulkan chart poster

t. same guy that believes him when he says zen2 will be 16c 5ghz

old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/bkoa3o/analysing_navi_part_2/

r/AYYMD IMPLODING AGAIN

Based

Based.

It's on GCN again. What the fuck do you expect? I want AMD to actually challenge Nvidiachads but they need to drop GCN and try new shit. It's got to the point where fucking Intel might be the second runner in GPU tech because AMD refuses to accept that India shit into their hands and they refuse to clean them.

>60 cu on navi doesn't give you the same performance as 60 cu on vega
I'm guessing because navi is just full on using gddr6 instead of expensive hbm

Incremental updates to an arch are standard, nvidia and intel do they same thing.

That would be based if Intel actually brought something to the table. The GPU space desperately needs competition. I don't give a fuck who brings us better value, I just want better value. Matrox could come back from the dead and I'd be happy.

Attached: D4QfzQ7U4AAJiUh.jpg (1536x2048, 611K)

>listening to AyymdronedTV
That's only one step above wccftech

Like Navi from SEL?

Wccftech is a legitimate source. Wccftech is not run by Pajeets. I repeat. Wccftech is not run by Pajeets.

Navi is last GCN

THOU SHALT ADD REFERENCES TO STATEMENTS NOT THINE

“Engineers can’t wait to be done it”
It like they say “fuck we give up with this arc”
RIP GCN and never ever see you again.

...Does anybody remember how it's supposed to be the PS5 arch as well?

No, it's run by pakis instead.

Well it’s console we don’t need to push clock speed too much I think it will be fine

just because the PCB has solder points, doesn't mean the card will actually use them

Attached: CoolerB.jpg (800x704, 170K)

Bro it is AMD. it might not use them, but lets be real here.

At some point, AMD's inability to deliver an efficient GPU will kill their console business. When Nvidia on 7NM can offer superior performance at lower TDP, even the integration of AMD CPU + GPU might not be enough.

Nvidia SoCs are expensive trash, Sony would never use them..

Next gen consoles aren't using APUs :O

youtube.com/watch?v=6__TvBzAVj8

PS4 already had loud fans, can't imagine how bad PS5 will be with AYYMD POOVI HOUSEFIRES

They should just make it xbox hueg with BIG heatsinks

Why are AMD GPUs always so fucking shit? Nvidia are smug but you have to give them credit, they consistently release solid products.

If RTG continues to flop, then soon it'll be Nvidia's 2x performance at 1/4 TDP vs whatever housefire AMD releases. There is a breaking point where Sony & Microsoft will be forced to switch to Nvidia so they can hype up a new gen of graphics without haven't to install a literally ton of heatsink in the console.

I'm currently intel & amd, looks like I'm going to be going back to amd & nvidia like when I first started out when a phenom II and 560ti. That little guy was so based. I'm honestly now rooting for intel to bring the heat to nvidia in the gpu space, I'm tired of radeon disappointing over and over again.

Sony/MS will never: the APU, NVIDIA can't x86

>It's true when adored says navi is going bring 2070 performance for half the price
>It's false when adored says navi is a hot, loud piece of shit like every other amd release this decade

Attached: AMD Austin.jpg (540x720, 257K)

It could become AMD + Nvidia or even Intel + Nvidia. If they're not going for an all-AMD SoC, where's the incentive to stick to AMD for CPU if Intel can offer a competitive contract?

youtube.com/watch?v=YkyhvCdJ_vM

As I said, Nvidia SoCs are hot garbage. And no matter how good the GPU portion performance is, Sony will never go for them. Can't say the same about Microsoft, we'll have to see.

Yeah but two chips are more expensive than an APU

Normies are spoiled by 200$ console bundles. Moving to discrete graphics would increase performamce it would also increase cost. I don't think either Sony or MS have the balls to charge 600$ for a console like they did at the beginning of 7th gen.

>that paste job
>that huge gap between the pipes

Can't wait for 7nm Nvidia to start a wave of mass suicides of ayymdrones.

>I can't wait for pay 600 dollars for a 2660 :)

>citing youtube
Ask me how I know you're uneducated

some mutt who can barely speak english is a valid source now? cool

Honestly, 7nm Nvidia will be a bloodbath. I'm probably going to keep using my GTX 770 until then.

>scottish
>mutt
american education

I want to see what they'll do. To match a 2080ti they'll need a really big chip, and they can't even cut out all of the meme ai stuff as that means dropping features. 350-400mm^2 seems realistic and a bit bigger than vega20. Nvidia can maintain their margin, say 2080ti performance for "cheaper" but getting above that in performance sounds like it'll be very expensive again. I long for the days before this price gouging.

I WAITED ALL THIS TIME NONONONONO

MS and Sony worked with Nvidia before, and stopped after that.
Once someone works with Nvidia once, they won't work with them again.

>mfw this leak
what now lads? all buy second hand 1080s?

Attached: D5k8PGDX4AIdejN.jpg large.jpg (675x1200, 143K)

OOOH TOMMMMMY ROBINSOOOOOON!

our Tommy was really upset by the amd news

Attached: D5k8-9uWkAAvBJG.jpg large.jpg (528x389, 35K)

Dirty, dirty smear merchants.

Why is Navi 10 faster than Navi 12? I don't get it.

Why is TU102 faster than TU104? I don't get it.

Nigger, you're the one who said that Polaris is 10% ABOVE GTX 1070 here Look at the fucking image you posted yourself, it is for the nonexistent 480x/490 that were eventually out and is called RX 590.

He is right on the money with RX 480 performance and overall polaris perf.

The performance will increase along with the price.
The will double RTX performance and call it a massive leap and revolutionary.

Hes not u turd licker, poolaris 10 should be in the Performance range of a 1070 he said, we all know where this shit card is placed
>rx590
Yeah right, it is totally on the same level as the 1070
>300w power draw
Only 10% faster than a 580
Ampoo in a nutshell

Not... like this...

Attached: amdloodie.jpg (633x758, 162K)

Are you blind or retard? Did you read what you just posted? What kind of retarded nigger are you?
10% BELOW GTX1070 is not in the performance range of 1070, and this is, again, for the nonexistent 480x/490.

Nobody said it is on the same ballpark as 1070 except for you.

It is you nigger, a vega56 is 10% faster than a 1070 but they are still in the same class
Again you fucktard, he claimed that poolaris10 would be 40% faster than what it turned out to be
He claimed that poolaris12 would be on paar with the gtx980
It isn't even in sight of that card
Same thing for poovi, will barely match the 1660ti at twice the power draw
Now get a job you welfare leeching pajeet

> he claimed that poolaris10 would be 40% faster than what it turned out to be

You did, not him.

>He claimed that poolaris12 would be on paar with the gtx980

How the fuck is that even logical given the fact the he said that Poolaris10 is equivalent to 980 in this very fucking image and the vid you posted?
The very same fucking video where he said AMD will have nothing on Pascal high end and will not directly compete with it.

You're drunk, got to bed.

Hello again, welfare leeching pajeet
>video clearly shows him drawing shit like poolaris10 10% behind 1070 gtx
You did, not him
Ok
>small poolaris will be on par with gtx980
>how the fuck is that even logical
Idk, amdshills don't have any logic behind their words
Now close your channel you disgusting amd shill

>Ok

Again, 10% below is for a nonexistent GPU.
RX480 ended up more or less right eventually, and so does 1070.
Also do you even realize that Pascal isn't even out when he made that vid and that vid is a prediciton for both lineup and where it stands?

>Idk, amdshills don't have any logic behind their words
Please point out where he said poolaris12 is on par with 980.

It doesn't matter how the card is called you pos, it only matters how the gpu is called, big poo is poolaris 10
They could name it r20 899x,it wouldnt matter because the chip is poolaris10
>please point out where he said
You mean where you said
>small poolaris should be on par with the 980gtx
Yeah right, you didn't even got the rx480 right, as it is still slower than a 980
You are fucking disgusting, you were even banned from plebbit, because they couldnt stand your lies

We will get decent raytracing for under 300 bucks.