Try yourself Jow Forums your daily 5 min IQ test

Three boxes, x in the top right

Your IQ is at Down's level if you think something this simple is accurate.

Real IQ tests take half a day at least.

>Three boxes, x in the top right
k...
and that?? Is the same on the top right right?

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-135532_Samsung Internet.jpg (720x1280, 290K)

the IQ test was not to press the link.
How many failed?

No it's a pretty good IQ test desu.
If you sign up it's guaranteed your IQ is lower than 90.

Anons how good is this?
123test.com/iq-test/id=ZSTIAUOK3UBK&version=

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-12-07-04-49.png (480x800, 76K)

Top right.
3 boxes and one x

>13:05
>11:13
>11:47
>06:50
thank you for the time zone FAGOTS MUHAHAHAHA!!

Attached: 1oy4gf.jpg (640x400, 38K)

Attached: Screenshot_2018-05-28 The Curse of the High IQ Aaron Clarey 9781522813750 Amazon com Books.png (978x745, 174K)

why do you publish a Type D book
user?

Bluepilled.
I got most of them right and it still marked them wrong.

Attached: jews.jpg (1439x2300, 595K)

Got 129 but apparently answered everything correctly, can someone explain pic related though? I picked the left option but the right one could be correct as well

Attached: Capture.png (652x717, 38K)

Bottom left user

This

It's the bottom left.

>They fell for the online iq test meme
Why do you people have such a high inferiority complex?

lol guess I'm retarded.
I tried to go fast cos I thought there might be a time component.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-12_13-29-40.png (596x105, 9K)

Brainlet

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-082555_Chrome.jpg (1440x2560, 608K)

>128 to 144
With standard deviation this is in the range of the administered test I took so maybe a general since it gives a range for some reason. The Norway one test.mensa.no/ is better than this one, this one is too short.

Fine, idk really but it looks ok.

>no fun allowed.jpg
You guys just failed the social test.

Attached: 7RDGMLENKBEA.png (671x673, 76K)

Are you just retarded? Judging by your browser, you probably are.

Looking in columns, the x's move one down each row. In the third column, second row, the left x should move down one, but there's no space below it, so it wraps around and goes to the top left. So the answer is the bottom left option.

Although, both the options you pointed at can be argued as well. Wrapping around is not necessarily more intuitive than going back (up) or staying in place (stuck).

Got 115 on Mensa.

Attached: h.png (1080x2114, 196K)

123test.com/iq-test/id=OXA1RGGQSVOZ&version=

gonna take the others now

Attached: Screenshot_1.png (688x217, 14K)

123test.com/iq-test/id=CGE70HOIJPPI&version=

boring

Attached: Screenshot_2.png (706x278, 18K)

this is an avrage score you fucking asshole!
you probably did it 10 times untill you get that range

I hit all random answers and finished the test in 7 seconds, and still got near the average intelligence. This test is bungo.

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-093221.png (2048x874, 135K)

Anyone who scores below 133-149 is retarded. This is the dumbest IQ test I've ever taken

>test.mensa.no/
tried this one instead. last 2 questions I had to go fast because I ran out of time wondering why one of them was so gay.

Attached: Screenshot_3.png (801x600, 24K)

ITT: "Geniuses" who've never actually took a real IQ test out of fear that it might actually be accurate so they take online fakes to feel better about being a failure

123test.com/iq-test/id=TKKHGBGHUDR3&version=

can I keep browsing Jow Forums

Attached: Screenshot_20190512_191009.png (752x157, 13K)

>never actually took a real IQ test out of fear
it doesn't help that it's something that costs money and has zero return on investment, compared to doing the exact same test for free and it being equally worthless

>answer randomly
>get 91
wew

am I a Jow Forumsenious now?

Attached: Screenshot_Firefox_20190512-230233.png (1080x2160, 169K)

>the exact same test
Really now? Which one of the credible standards is this based off of? Surely you're aware that there's not an individual test called "The IQ Test," right?

I clicked on the link and it said my IQ is between 115 and 131. I guess I'm above average then. Don't understand how it can give a result without asking any questions though.

>Really now?
yep

heh, nice

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-192906.jpg (1080x1920, 524K)

the link is just a proof to your results..
just navigate to the test..
but by your question i think your iq is below 100 so dont bother mate..

Umm it shows mine is 133 to 149
It's somewhat accurate, my actual one would be 135ish imo

You guys know this shit is a meme right?

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-140656_Firefox_Klar.png (1080x1920, 166K)

I would argue that if you look at them horizontally (left to right), they move left one space each time and wrap to the next row on the last image, giving you the indication that they wrap. which I confirmed by getting it right.

>between 135 and 155

Yeah, I already knew this, since I was 6, I mean really.

says the brainlet who couldn't even get the 133 minimum

1, 1, 1
2, 2, 2
3, 3, 3

rotation pattern is shown diagonally (top-right to bottom-left).

Lol that was so fucking easy you must be a litteral tard to not figure out all the questions.

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-191500_Firefox.png (1080x1920, 151K)

This shit is too funny.

123test.com/iq-test/id=QSEVHLVTXDEP&version=

I got 140 on the Mensa one and "within a range of 133 up to 149" on the 123test one.
I find I normally get a way worse score when I'm sleepy but I'm surprisingly clever today.

Attached: 2019-05-12-192302_752x599_scrot.png (752x599, 34K)

Well I did get scored at 125 when I was a kid, but that was part of a general diagnosis to treat adhd and lowkey schizophrenia.

123test.com/iq-test/id=73AOZ628X1CW&version=

Attached: 1555812012027.png.webm (550x309, 1.16M)

Internet IQ tests? Is it 2008 again? Going to whip out the Meyer's Briggs as well?

tfw you take both types of tests and the ranges don't overlap at all.

>when I was a kid
There's one every thread.

Spoilers genius, this is a test that you get better at as you practice. Only the very first result counts, everything else and the sample is contamined. Nowadays, given the proliferation of these tests even on facebook feeds, any results of even pen&paper evaluations will likely be skewed towards the higher end of the spectrum. Well, it filters out actual retards I guess.

I've never done this test before and the last time I did an IQ test was probably a year or two ago.

Any kind of test because it's always find the pattern questions. Just being familiar with the mechanisms behind the test is enough to spoil it.

Maybe so. I feel like I didn't recognize any of the patterns when I just did that Mensa one though and I had to figure them all out. But now I have done, I feel like I'd easily be able to do a similar test again since half the questions were either adding shapes together or XORing shapes together.

if \/-
and -\/
should the answer be /-\ ?

>if you know how to find patterns you can't take an IQ test
Amazing, truly a revolutionary discovery that you should bring up to the field of psychology. Never mind that there are several different types of IQ tests (that I'm certain you couldn't even name a single one of), you sound like you know what you're talking about.

gg ez.
but seriously those pattern matches were too easy and too few to justify that score

Attached: SmartSelect_20190512-191354_Brave.jpg (1417x2060, 361K)

In online tests I get 135
In a real IQ test I got 106

>meme
this is false they have profesional certification, from the international high IQ society. you should sighn up and check it yourself..

ihiqs.org

Considering almost everyone here is over 120 it's pretty obvious.

Attached: Screenshot_20190512-175028.jpg (1080x1920, 361K)

Is there a single IQ test thats even worth trusting?

Is there any benefit to having your IQ tested and showing it off to others other than for bragging rights?

What are you GNU with their timezones?

No, because the whole point of IQ is a meme. It measures how quickly you can recognize patterns or do simple calculations/transformations in your head, but it doesn't mean you are "smarter" than anyone else.

Oy vey! What did they mean by this?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-12-18-04-06-1.png (1321x1455, 125K)

No, IQ tests are a meme. I work in a restaurant and the management weeds out tards by having newbies wash dishes and make salads. If you can't wash and put away dishes and chop up vegetables you're literally so fucking retarded that you can't function. I have seen retards who can't handle these stations who get fired. If you have an IQ over 80 you get moved to grill, food prep, etc. Actually making people do a job is the best test, for which there is no substitute. Matching shapes and colors doesn't mean you can think clearly or make quick decisions under pressure.

Attached: DESKTOP.jpg (3840x2160, 1.03M)

99 to 115. I am become brainlet destroyer of worlds

Youre retarded. IQ is one of the most thoroughly studied human measures in existence, for a hundred years or so butthurt egalitarians have been trying to destroy it and it still persists because it is one of the best overall measures out there.

Online IQ tests on the other hand like this ARE a meme. But proper IQ tests are not, IQ is even a better indication of job performance than past experience is many times.

A downward triangle, four dots and a square?

> Your IQ score lies within a range of 133 up to 149, or it may be even higher!

Wew lads

IQ is a measure of potential, not actually how good someone is at their job or how intelligent. You could look at two students studying for a test. One of them might have a higher IQ, but if they don't study for the material at all they will score lower than the other student who did. In that situation, IQ doesn't really matter since even though student 1 had more potential, he chose not to take advantage of it.

>IQ is even a better indication of job performance than past experience is many times
I'd like to see a source for this. It sounds like you're falling victim to the age old causation=correlation fallacy. Better workers may have higher IQs, but you need evidence that shows they are better *because* of their higher IQs.

IQ correlates with job performance, it correlates with wealth. It correlates with much.

You dont know better than a hundred years of people studying this field mate. Sorry.

Here is a decent article also containing the information for job performance and citation.

thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/the-validity-of-iq/

Some high quality pressure there in the restaurant biz. What men of steel

133 to 149 on Culture fair, 125 on classical, fucked up one question because I didn't read it right. IQ is still a shit measure of intelligence.

No, is absolutely correct. Unused potential isn't worth anything when measured. Actual field tests are the best indicator of how employees perform.

It's almost like you didn't read his post. IQ means nothing. You need an average to high IQ, a decent work ethic, and the ability to work under pressure to make it in almost any job. You can score 150 on an IQ test but if you aren't willing to put in the work that's required, you won't succeed. Experience matters. Your ability to match shapes doesn't. Have you ever been interviewed for a job and asked to rotate triangles in your head, dipshit?

Working 14 hours without a break or a meal isn't easy. I do that three or four times a week when I do back to back shifts. I bet you're a NEET or a paper pushing queer.

>IQ correlates
Please read my post again before responding to me.

>didn't read the studies

How about killing yourself you retard? I linked an article that has all the citations. Stop being so arrogant to actually think you know better than an entire field.

Please learn how correlates are measured you fucking ignorant pilock. Look at how its compared to past job experience. Read my original comments. This is all what I said. IQ is a better judge of job performance than all but work sample study.

How do you know you got them right if you're a re-re?

You mad bro? Sounds like you've never taken any stats courses in your life since you're unable to discern between causation and correlation.

Attached: thaymc.jpg (621x502, 23K)

First rule of online tests: don't tell a user they're below average unless you're damned sure.

Go tell the people that conducted the studies they've never taken a stats course. Youre actually retarded if you dont recognize an over .5 correlation as significance and can't even read the other judges it was compared against.

bad news guys, you're both retarded

Epic enlightened fence sitter. The guy posting studies backing up his assertions is "retarded".

The very act of posting about your "high IQ" from an internet test exemplifies how poorly you understand intelligence and proves you're a complete tool.

Attached: wizzard.jpg (645x1000, 107K)

>115 to 131
S'what I get for frying my brain and liver with booze and opiates through my 20's...

heh...

Attached: 1557705590.png (727x119, 11K)

I fucking wish this was true, maybe then I'd have a job.

Attached: big brain.png (695x32, 4K)

you meant right, not left, but yeah, you're right. that's a strong argument that they must wrap, not stop or reverse. cool.