AMD BTFO

HOW CAN AMD RECOVER FROM THIS?

Attached: dAByfhFYk7Psbve42CZ7k-650-80.png (650x365, 107K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-2600-vs-AMD-Eng-Sample--2D3212BGMCWH2-3734-N/3955vsm697865
youtube.com/watch?v=Y3ryOcZD4Js
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

OHMYFUCKINGGODIT'SSIXLESSFRAMES

getting tired of your bullshit shekel-kun

By being cheaper

...

oh no, 10% slower for.... half the price...

Is noone wondering why i5-8400 is as fast as i9-9900k ? hmm

and thats the thread
hope you had your fun, OP

Games are technology grandpa

...

One, nothing wrong with me

Attached: WoT (1).png (1314x1192, 54K)

Two, nothing wrong with me

Attached: Wildlands.png (1314x1192, 56K)

...

Three, nothing wrong with me

Attached: WD2.png (1314x1192, 52K)

The 12 core ES just got on userbench and it has the same single core performance at 3.25GHz as a r6 2600 has at 3.9GHz
That's a pretty hefty IPC boost. Even without the increased clocks from 7HPC

Four, nothing wrong with me

Attached: Warhammer.png (1314x1192, 54K)

3 MORE FPS OMG HOW WILL AMD RECOVER FROM THIS

One, something's got to give

Attached: Witcher (2).png (1314x1192, 53K)

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-2600-vs-AMD-Eng-Sample--2D3212BGMCWH2-3734-N/3955vsm697865
If you compare it to a 3.7GHz 2200g it's actually faster in single core.

Two, something's got to give

Attached: SoW.png (1314x1192, 53K)

Don't bother. Intelfags are on full denial about Zen2. They're all acting as if AMD somehow cannot increase performance while jumping from 14+ to 7nm. They're all acting as if AMD made no improvements to the architecture to increase clocks and better memory compatibility.
Let them have their party while it lasts. We all know Intel has nothing to counter what AMD has coming. Even if we go by the most negative expectations of Zen2, it will still obliterate Intel on every single end. There's no point trying to fight these shills going on about last year's tech, when the newest and latest is only 2 weeks away from blowing them all the fuck out for at least 2 or 3 years.

>Ryzen 5 2400G only 20% slower than a Intel Core-i9 9900k
Yeah, AyyMD trully BTFO...
Fucking brainlet Intelfags.

Three, something's got to give

Attached: MEA.png (1314x1192, 53K)

AMD will fucking bottleneck my 200mhz display.

NOW!!!

Attached: BF1.png (1314x1192, 52K)

shhhh this is a bait thread

I don't see the problem, the 2600x is still performing great for its price.

Imagine bottlenecking a gpu
Imagine not hitting 5ghz
Imagine having to buy nigger ram
Imagine your new 7nm process trying to catch up to a 14nm process
Imagine being bad OC
Inagine being on a phone plan to upgrade cpu every year to catch up to 2014 cpu technology
Imagine having broken drivers every release

>1080p low
>1080p LOW

>RTX 2080

Playing 1080p Low on a rtx 2080 ever.

Imagine having only 16pci lanes.

Attached: ProGoy.jpg (1098x685, 82K)

so rage 2 has a cap of 210fps then. someone post f1 2018.

Imagine having a 144Hz monitor.
Did you know why 144Hz?
Because they're all reconverted 3D screens from when 3D failed.
And you all bought into it.

>way higher than 144 fps so just buy the cheaper cpu

>neither cpu can reach 120 fps so who fucking cares

Bad editing rabbi

Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor

Attached: Fortnite.png (1314x1192, 50K)

HOLY FUCK 6 MORE FPS
LOOK HOW FUCKING BAD AMD IS

Wow, that 2700x looks like such a good deal.

i don't see the 120p benchmarks.
>intothetrash.jpg

>ultra quality CPU benchmark
Nice, I didn't want to see the performance difference anyway.

This, a TRUE gaymer only plays at 480p on the lowest possible settings using a refrigerant industrial water chilled RTX 2080ti @ 2,600 MHz and an i9-9900K at 5.2 GHz cooled with liquid nitrogen

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 13K)

You can already see the AMD CPU coking even with epic settings in Fortnite. On 1080p low (what people who play FPS games on) will see a massive performance difference.

>3-10 fps difference
>at 200fps
Fuck off

>On 1080p low (what people who play FPS games on)
No they don't, they play on 240p low you lying fuck. What kind of antisemite needs anything more than that?

Attached: AMD_bottlenecking.png (1408x685, 564K)

How could this happen intelbros?

Intard checklist:
>240Hz 1080p monitor even though 99.999% of humans literally cannot discern clear continous movement past ~10ms (ie ~100 FPS) intervals
>lowest possible gayme settings with neat things like AA, AO, HQ shadows/lightning, AF completely turned off to the point where everything looks like a nintendo game
>$1,000+ GPU like a 1080ti/2080ti meant to be used specifically for gaming at 1080p
>play at 144p despite having a monitor fully capable of 1080p because muh 200+ FPS
>$200+ tripple fan AIO to OC intard CPU to 5GHz
>very big nose
Did I get that all correct?

Attached: mF9Mn0l.jpg (1150x1266, 214K)

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=Y3ryOcZD4Js

they don't have water chillers big enough for that.

Thank you for the best chip I ever owned.
I'm going to get a 2700x next...which will be to touch for my needs but fuck it.

Attached: Capture.png (638x553, 30K)

How many vunerabilities does Intel has counting today's new one? I am fucked should toss my 6700k out of the window

Security issues dont matter, getting better performance matters more

Wait for zen2.

With all these patches I will have an ssd with hdd speeds

>IT'S NOT ONLY ONE FRAME -- BUT FOUR!FOUR -- FRAMES -- MORE! AHAHAH AMD ETERNALLY BTFO
i want milennials to gtfo out of Jow Forums

NOW ITS 6 MORE FRAMES

Proprietary benchmarks are worthless.

OPEN SOURCE BENCHMARKS ARE BIASED TOWARDS AMD

Fix the bias then. It's open source after all.

>LOOK AT ME IM RETARDED

Attached: index.png (233x216, 4K)

i'm honestly laughing at your employment choices m8

definitely getting a 2700x once zen 2 hits, the deals will be insane

WUT THE FUCK
I JUST BOUGHT A NEW PC, NOW I HAVE TO TRASH IT AND BUY ALL NEW PARTS

>167 fps vs 173 fps
Intelfags are autistic

Why are you comparing a 400$ 8700k to 280$ 2700X? The 2700X is on sale on amazon, but even the standard price is 330$.
So on the worst case (400-330)$=70$. Now let's see here 2 more FPS at 1440p, so I'm paying 35$ more per each FPS on Intel. Here I'm paying 23$ per each extra FPS. And on and the 2700X has higher FPS, so Intel is more expensive and objectively worse. Great shilling OP, compare a Xeon to a 80$ APU next.

Attached: 125769165298.png (625x626, 66K)

No. Not all Intel users are /v/ toddlers who replaced their personality with international corporation brand identity, engaging in le epic X vs Y threads.

1700 is already near $150 and it fucking DESTROYS the i7-7700K

Attached: Ryzen-R7-1700-vs-i7-7700k-Average-Gaming-FPS-Benchmark-1.jpg (750x410, 36K)

153 vs 154 fps BTFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO INTELBROS WE WUZ GAYMEN KANGZ

Now do these benchmarks again after applying patches for all these brand new Intel vulnerabilities.

Performance will decrease by 3-9% according to Intel.

IKR

>2 more cores than 8400
>10 more threads than 8400
>LESS FPS
tip top keke

shut your mouth you stupid goy.

You do realize that at ultra quality 1440p that the bottleneck is the gpu right? Even a 1080ti

This, the only fair benchmark for gaming is 144p on ultra low settings. Anything else is extremely antisemetic and you should be executed on the spot for even considering it.

Attached: 1539012742538.png (2176x104, 572K)

>2 more cores than 8400
>10 more threads than 8400
>double the FPS
>2 more FPS
TOP KEK

>This intelkike thread again
Hold my Flammenwerfer hans

Attached: oyvey.jpg (1324x2868, 415K)

SHUT IT DOWN!

Attached: oyyvey.jpg (1314x9536, 1010K)

>>double the FPS
more than double the price*

oy vey

Attached: shut it down.png (805x809, 53K)

B-but Jow Forums told me Ryzen can't push games past 60 FPS...

>8400 double the price of 2700x
>8400 double the price of 2600x
Are you okay retard?

I mean those measurements are important for real use scenarios, but that doesn't actually test the strength and speed of the CPUs. It's not a CPU benchmark or measurement test.

>Ryzen 5 3700x 12 core 5GHz boost on 4 cores
>$329
Post your dick when

Attached: 1537487450826.jpg (1000x676, 138K)

Ummm you didn’t used the approved ashes of singularity benchmark so these results don’t count

heh I'm talking about the 9900k :-)

Colé fi, que tá pegando?

Games don't always matter

>ultra quality cpu benchmarks

If you ain't first youre last

i have to admit, intel is pretty consistent with this shit.

Attached: funwhileitlasted.jpg (375x363, 159K)

>buy intel
>forced to update microcode every time another hole is found in the microarchitecture
Let's just admit that all of Intel's gainz are from steroids

Attached: 1556888995876.jpg (728x729, 200K)

Attached: 1555686600647.jpg (2620x3416, 1.74M)

mfw

Intel shills in full damage control

>204 fps vs 208 fps
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: 1544653439765.jpg (810x587, 328K)

And then you install all the security patches and your shitel cpu gets destroyed even by bulldozer.

>video games
Fuck off back to /v/

remove 40% from incel performance for real up to date comparison

is this post ironic?
who bitches about a 4 fps difference? (protip: its useless nobodies)