PERFORMANCE IS NOT AFFECTED

>HT enables on both. Doesn’t this require the disabling of HT to completely mitigate the problem

Amd-Idiots btfo

>mitigations applied
>ht enabled
chose one

Disabling HT doesn't fix the problem, only makes it harder to exploit. Anyone who says that is larping

Security holes don't matter

Attached: 1517515392434.png (1134x206, 19K)

>they
Hi partner, i'm also an online damage controlling merchant for Intel corporation. How do you do?

I'm very fine, thank you very much sir.

AMD is also vulnerable to speculative side channel attacks. But pajeets just won't admit it.

youtube.com/watch?v=Q2miHAhHwng

True, AMD is even paying those researchers hurting Intel yet they never find anything for AMD, strange huh?

Nice role-playing, but the smell from your shitting street isn't fooling anyone.

>posts 9th gen benchmark (which is not vulnerable anyways)

post 8th or 7th gen you fuck

also, go fuck yourself OP

>mds mitigations
what are those?

>speculative
>look dude AMD MIGHT be vulnerable, they just didn't find the vulnerabilities yet
>therefore it's exactly the same as Intel having a billion confirmed vulnerabilities!

>posts 9th gen benchmark (which is not vulnerable anyways)

Attached: 9th gen not vuln.png (1063x145, 15K)

If they spent as much funding trying to find AMD vulnerabilities, They would be in deep shit to so Just give it time, Ryzen is still new.

>using Intel
I'm not a vulnerability collector

Attached: 1557925086.png (2760x1945, 133K)

AAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH

BTFOREVER

all AMD processors are vulnerable to Spectre V1 and V2 attacks you idiot.

>Disregard all the AMD shilling.
And why would you trust (((Intel))) shilling when it's proven that they fake benchmarks and sabotage AMD when compiling software? Trusting a liar is the most retarded thing you can do.

Attached: benchmarks.png (953x576, 34K)

Source: Intel

All intel shills should be purged and decapitated and their families burned alive.

Attached: 1547051816101.jpg (1021x503, 168K)

>promoting goyware
kys

Attached: 1557925294.png (618x361, 62K)

> HT enabled
Isn't disabling HT is one of the requirements to migitate it?

>lose in performance
>"t-they compiled w-wrong"

>families burned alive
pajeet status: confirmed

No.

Drones confirmed to be street shitting ackbars

Can't say for 8 or 7, but it looks like there's there's no visible performance impact on 4/5 gen. Benchmarks scores are pretty much the same for me.

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS84L1kvODM3NTM4L29yaWdpbmFsL2ludGVsLW1kcy1wcm9jZXNzZXMuSlBH.jpg (1020x623, 72K)

What's "it"? There's three new ones and not even disabling HT resolves the issue on at least one.

>t. intelfag so dumb that can't even read the paper where it clearly says 9th gen is even easier to exploit

>*Intel cuts own wrist*
>AMD is hurting Intel!

[citation needed]
[poc needed]

>damage control
Kys. You can clearly see Ryzen "gaining performance" when pretending to be (((Intel))).
And yes, (((Intel))) compiles shit to reduce performance of non-(((Intel))) CPUs which they even document.

Stay mad indian kike
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/families

DAMAGE CONTROL IN FULL FORCE
>DAMAGE CONTROL IN FULL FORCE
DAMAGE CONTROL IN FULL FORCE
>DAMAGE CONTROL IN FULL FORCE
DAMAGE CONTROL IN FULL FORCE
>DAMAGE CONTROL IN FULL FORCE

Except you need physical access to exploit AMD with Spectre so it's completely worthless, it's literal misinformation by Intel shills to try to implicate AMD in the same flaws even though it isn't affected.

did you even read it, faggot?

>[citation needed]
>[poc needed]
google you inbred fuck

Don't make shit up as you go, pajeet. All speculative execution attacks can theoretically be done using a browser. But they are hard to pull off that's why they are useless. They require extremely accurate timing precision which browsers don't give (search browser time fuzzing) . That's why these latest vulnerabilities are as useless as Meltdown and Spectre.

Do you even have a brain?

They don't even need to fund actual research, just pretend AMD is vulnerable too like they did before.

Funny how this vuln only affecting Intel is released so close to the release of zen 2 from AMD. I mean what an coincidence right?

Red alert! The goyim know!

Poo in the loo Rakesh

>AMD put the vulnerabilities in the Intel shitcessors
You could say the timing is convenient but Intel has a new vulnerability every other week so any time is convenient.

>Hyperthreading
So no performance hit

wtf I love AMD now

>Benchmarks scores are pretty much the same for me.
40% lower performance for tasks relying on hyper threading, according to apple.

that is, most servers using Xeons and virtualisation.

wow the competition is fucking garbage, how convenient of them!

Intel said the same shit about Meltdown, pic related is what actually happened.

Attached: epic_games_cpu_usage.png (858x405, 48K)

>with HT disabled
Without HT disabled in single app loads (games, benchmarks) everything was the same really.
For server loads it may be somewhat different tho.

uh, what's actually happening?

CPU utilization drastically increasing after Epic patched their servers for meltdown/spectre.

But only one core, so who cares?

Pretending to be a retarded shill still makes you a retarded shill, each number is a different service and only one was patched.
epicgames.com/fortnite/forums/news/announcements/132642-epic-services-stability-update

Yet they still use Intel hardware, guess why? Because AMD sucks.

Ignore that it was reported to Intel a year ago and disclosed only now.

(You)

>Don't make shit up as you go, pajeet.
(You)
medium.com/@sirajea/massive-security-flow-on-cpu-level-meltdown-spectre-48236b875ac1

Incredible how shills are still trying to pretend AMD was affected by the Intel vulnerabilities and are trying to do it again.

Intel gets a new vulnerability almost every fucking month

post the source juden

and his nose

intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/mds.html

of fucking course

Aren't these the same people who sold you the chips they knew to be unsafe to begin with? Sorry to make bad comparisons, but isn't this a bit like taking NASAs work that NASA has a rover on Mars?

Epic. They deserve it for making fortnite.

>intel.com

Attached: 100 percent.png (775x1492, 257K)

get fucked kike, as all intel benchmarks these are outright lies

Attached: getfuckedkike.png (1093x121, 54K)

Not all 100% are created equal

shekel-kun is on a rampage today

you can't make this shit up. they just cannot stop jewing.

Oh no no no no no no

Attached: D6lxHVCXsAAZuYF.png (1920x1080, 43K)

>mitigations applied
>HT enabled
That means mitigations are not applied though

>intel.com
LOL

SHUT
IT
DOWN

JavaScript _is_ a viable attack surface!

youtube.com/watch?v=KAgoDQmod1Y

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Intel Corporation is dead!

Press C to cope.

Attached: 15.23.40-15.05.19-14261[1].png (1000x570, 361K)

>no source
Into the trash it goes

>disabling HT doesn't slow down tasks that already saturate ALUs and FPUs
Golly, what a surprise. Also, what about no mitigations and HT vs. mitigations and no HT?

I'm not affected because I have a firewall enabled.

OHNONONO

Hi, Intel merchant. Read the paper
mdsattacks.com/files/ridl.pdf
if you can't make a functioning PoC from it you should not be posting here and instead you should go ask your community manager what damage control to post next as a reply.

Attached: AMD hardware doesn't have this problem.png (1282x440, 115K)

>expecting anyone sane to read that
AyyMD drones at it again

If the stock didn't tank then it's not a big deal.

Attached: intel stock.png (907x489, 38K)

the only benchmark graph we need.

Attached: 1557875538362.jpg (2000x1543, 216K)

>reply so bad it doesn't even qualify as damage control
See folks, this is how low Intel Defense Task Force is nowadays. Money is running low, so they are cuttings costs anywhere they can, online "marketing" seem to be the first ones.

where's that meme?
we need to include
>customers attention span are not needed
>customers literacy are not needed

AMD is clown tier trash and is slow, Prove me wrong.

>next browser update makes this redundant

Uh oh

Attached: _0.png (500x375, 169K)

if it was up they wanted it under wraps until after they're next release cycle, let alone their competitiors
>Apparently Intel attempted to play down the issue by trying to award the researchers with the 40,000 dollar tier reward and a separate 80,000 dollar reward as a "gift" (which the researchers kindly denied) instead of the maximum 100,000 reward for finding a critical vulnerability.
>Intel was also planning to wait for at least another 6 months before bringing this to light if it wasn't for the researchers threatening to release the details in May.
nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/05/14/hackers-mikken-op-het-intel-hart-a3960208

guess why?
because they got it for free.
actually, they probably "paid" -2m to -5m for their servers and workstations. All for the betterment of manking and muh gayms.

>we ar legun