Bluetooth 4.2+ on PC

Why can't I find a BT dongle of higher than 4.0 for my pc?

Attached: 1544288663716.png (321x208, 89K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gigabyte.com/nl/Motherboard/GC-WB1733D-I-rev-10#ov
asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_2011/P9X79_WS/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because m.2. wifi + bt combo cards are significantly better

I don't have emdotmeme on my motherboard

Stop being cheap and get a pcie card

Get a m.2 wireless adapter that fits in a PCIe slot

thanks. gonna buy:
gigabyte.com/nl/Motherboard/GC-WB1733D-I-rev-10#ov

The chinks are 4 years behind on bluetooth hardware implementation.

>bluetooth 4.1
>bluetooth 4.2
>bluetooth 5.0
>bluetooth 5.1

Attached: herro.jpg (480x360, 15K)

this has nothing to do with chinks there are no USB dongles for better than BT4.0

Could you elaborate? First time I'm hearing about this

One thing of note, if you want the bluetooth to function you have to hook the card up to USB header on motherboard

M.2 cards can have real antennas and just overall have a better chipset than cheap BT dongles

>One thing of note, if you want the bluetooth to function you have to hook the card up to USB header on motherboard

That's a positive.

Some machines I don't want cancerous bluetooth that can be MITM or worse something like blueborne that doesn't even require pairing.

At least wifi was ground up designed to obfuscate and encrypt traffic while bluetooth was originally designed to be wireless serial.

Who the fuck thought it was a good idea to make serial port wirelessly accesible?
Use a serial cable for your server/firewall/industrial machine controlling needs.

>One thing of note, if you want the bluetooth to function you have to hook the card up to USB header on motherboard
yeah I read about it in a review I looked up, it's fine though, I have a: asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_2011/P9X79_WS/

Can they run without a kernel module or firmware?
ie just work for debian?

Who do you think makes the dongles?

Depends on the chipset used

Give him a moment user he's slow.

so chinks make everything? then why are m.2 cards way ahead?

pci-e and usb are with qualcomm or intel so are m.2 the same?

Or are they all broadcom/realtek trash?
How can I be sure to identify which ones work.

because that's the newest meme money maker.

It's a sata+pcie interface after all so it's actually useful but it's hyped up a bit too much by every OEM.

pretty much all are intel

Thankyou.
Intel upstreams their networking chips.
It's why my x470 has a intel NIC on it instead of broadcom which requires a kernel module.

Like ALL of them use that EXACT same CSR8510 chip with the exact same board.
That chip is 4.0
There are 5.0 USB dongles though but rare.

I have a usb dongle myself. It kinda sucks and I'll probably get a intel 9260 or AX200 card.