She doesn't use c++17

uh like you got constexpr if/switch you got the if initialization that mentioned, std::any, std::filesystem, bunch of other stuff

Seriously guys, is my skillset the perfect chain of functionality for complete control?

>C DLL
>C++ wrapper
>Managed C++ wrapper around C++ wrapper
>into C# GUI

I can do fucking anything. Yet I still don't have a job in IT because fuck white people right?

>she

bruh, the new scope enhancements in conditional expressions

if(int result = someFunc(); result > 9001)
{
}
if(int result = someFunc2(); result < 3)
{
}

now there's no problem re-using the same temporary variable name

Can anyone explain the difference between "int const" and "const int" in this code fragment?

A variable declared inline has the same semantics as a function declared inline: it can be defined, identically, in multiple translation units, must be defined in every translation unit in which it is used, and the behavior of the program is as if there was exactly one variable.

struct MyClass
{
static const int sValue;
};

// Below
inline int const MyClass::sValue = 777;

nevermind, they are identical unless pointer types are used.

oh fuck yes no more lengthy template args in initialization

codingame.com/playgrounds/2205/7-features-of-c17-that-will-simplify-your-code/template-argument-deduction-for-class-templates

OMFG, is that a typical USA citizen?

"int const" and "const int" are always identical, as is "int const*" and "const int*", but not "int* const".

If you're ever in doubt about a type declaration in C, just read it right-to-left and it should make sense.
For example:
char const * const * const cargv
^~~~4~~~~^ ^~~3~~^ ^~~2~~^ ^~1~^
1) ... is a variable named 'cargv' which,
2) ... is a constant pointer,
3) ... to a constant pointer,
4) ... to a constant char.

This silly example could be used to pass argv from main() while forbidding any modification (the memory backing argv is modifiable and the C runtime may use some bits of it, so careful where you send your argv[x]'s and especially envp if used):
static void silly(thing* const foo, int const argc, const char* const* const argv) {
...
}
int main(int argc, char** argv, char** envp) {
...
thing foo;
silly(&foo, argc, argv);
...
}

You get the idea.

yeah dude that's joey, he is america

>using this bloated abomination of a language instead of Rust
That's how you identity a pajeet.

Attached: dancing-ferris.gif (734x490, 258K)

or you're just shit

I'm a total pleb. I use c++11 because it has for each loops.
Why should I consider c++17?
(Not trolling or anything, just curious why a non advanced user should consider it)

Attached: 1557931043497.jpg (298x288, 25K)

>C++
>white

I've seen more pajeets using C and C++ for embedded shit than Java or webdev.

Better constexpr and templates, more standard library support.

Ok thanks

Isn't that a Flaming Lips song

>caring about someone being 17

Imagine taking the modernistic jew feminist americunt law seriously.

Fuck this fat nigger by the way