Raid 5 or Raid 10 ?

Raid 5 or Raid 10 ?

Attached: 8F54ADB0-65B9-401B-AF95-3942D7222F3C.jpg (374x374, 19K)

RAIDZ

6

Do you have 5 drives or 10, retard?

6
Or 10

patrician detected

this

RAID 0 or striped vdevs and a daily incremental backup.
Every other choice is for betas.

JBOD and distributed copies of data or RAID 10 or 1 If just two disks.

Any parity array is prone to racey, bad implementations and all of them suffer potential write hole from uncontrollable power loss. Don't let zfs shills claim otherwise.

6

ZFS is safe from the write hole. When it reports a synchronous write is completed, it's guaranteed to be good. Of course async writes can be lost, but hopefully you're not relying on async writes since they're not guaranteed on any filesystem.

+ btrfs file system

Raid 0 is the only answer

and disable memory compression

SHR

Raid 10. 5 is obsolete now that HDD volume is dirt cheap, speed is the same as 10 years ago so speed is the king.

/thread

RAID 1 because:
- In case of a dropped array (it happens) you're still left with 2 working copies.
- You can easily make backups just by swapping one of the drives out and rebuilding.
- Moving to a new system is super easy.

The extra performance of RAID 10 isn't worth it.
If you need that much performance you'll probably want an SSD instead.

RAID 0 on 8 drives
>that picture

RAID10 hot spare always always

Don't you mean 7 drives. :^)

Lets compromise, Raid 7.5.

I don't know what raid actually is, something about mirroring maybe.

Attached: Fuck3d.gif (400x400, 9K)

Get the fuck out of my way poorfags

Attached: 1556768839576[1].png (850x798, 551K)

hot damn

What about high usage enterprise operations with databases? Aren't they slow to adopt SSDs due to concerns such as power outages (I know you should have some sort of UPS, but still)

what kind of datacenter has a power outage for a whole month?

>576TB of NVMe storage
ಠ_ಠ

Attached: Exploding-head.jpg (1280x1133, 205K)