Google to restrict modern ad blocking Chrome extensions to enterprise users

Based Google is saving the Internet from pirates.

>Google is essentially saying that Chrome will still have the capability to block unwanted content, but this will be restricted to only paid, enterprise users of Chrome. This is likely to allow enterprise customers to develop in-house Chrome extensions, not for ad blocking usage.

>For the rest of us, Google hasn’t budged on their changes to content blockers, meaning that ad blockers will need to switch to a less effective, rules-based system. This system is how blockers like AdBlock Plus currently work.

>One of the original concerns of switching to this system was the fact that Chrome currently imposes a limit of 30,000 rules, while popular ad blocking rules lists like EasyList use upwards of 75,000 rules. In the response, Google claims that they’re looking to increase this number, depending on performance tests, but couldn’t commit to anything specific.

9to5google.com/2019/05/29/chrome-ad-blocking-enterprise-manifest-v3/

Attached: selection.jpg (2524x1574, 1.66M)

Other urls found in this thread:

spyware.neocities.org/guides/firefox.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

See how the console-war anons haven't chimed-in on this one?

Doesn't matter much..if you are dumb-enough to use Chrome, then you are just fine with ads.

Chrome has a paid version?
What's the point of it?

THIS IS IT BRAVE BROS! WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS MOMENT!!!!!!

Based Google finally giving me a reason to escape the botnet. What browser should I use, Anons ?

gnu icecat

Chromium

Enterprise version, so companies can roll-out their own in-house extensions and such.

imagine switching from a google controlled botnet to another google controlled botnet

Chromium uses the EXACT SAME CODE & APIs as Chrome...no getting around this one.

imagine being tech illiterate like you

imagine being tech illiterate calling others tech illiterate

can ungoogled chromium save us?

'ungoogled' still uses the same code, what Google is going to do is completely remove the code that allows you to use un-restricted ad-blockers like UBlock.

In short: Nope.

>USING CHROME BOTNET

TOP KEK

Going back to chromium ungoogled

They could put it back.

>not manually installing AdNauseam
>using chrome
You deserve this

Firefox. Don't let the autists on here tell you bullshit. It's the only independent browser while every other browser uses modified Google Chrome code.

this + spyware.neocities.org/guides/firefox.html
or gnu icecat

That's not how code works- nevermind.

Literally no security

>spyware.neocites
Opinion discarded

whichever one you want.
do your own fucking research.

tor browser
librefox
tweaked compile time unbranded ESR firefox
waterfox
basilisk
palemoon
seamonkey
kmeleon
conkeror

opera presto 12.18
konqueror
webkit nightly (if on mac)
netsurf
dillo
links2
emacs

The day has come to pirate chrome. Omegalul.

>opera presto 12.18
If on Windows; the dumb cunts never released the update for other platforms

and where can one download the ltsc of chrome?

>no multi-account containers
>no tree tabs
>no adblockers

AAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Now who uses the shittiest browser, Jow Forums?

Attached: cutefox.png (1031x763, 870K)

>It's the only independent browser
>gets funded by google
lel

Imagine using anything other than qt foxes for browsing.

Attached: 16466637497627424.jpg (496x700, 53K)

Sorry, I'm not a tranny.

Can't you already do that though?

CHROMETODDLERS BTFO

Attached: 1548590643722.gif (500x491, 376K)

SAVE US HUAWEI

Time to spin up a pihole