Apparantly 5g is being rolled out in every major australian city and I am shitting bricks is 5g bad or not

SOMEONE FUCKING ANSWER ME WILL WE BE OKAY????

Attached: 1554578546628.jpg (250x249, 7K)

you're fucking fucked cunt mate

FUCK

As much as an australian can be, which is not that much.

>get telstra unlimited 5g plan
>$200 / month
>plug phone into switch or whatever
>get cheapest gigabit service with unlimited downloads

If you have a gamen house or a few house mates, its unironically the right play

Attached: PochNuk.png (597x384, 351K)

>wireless
>gamen

doesn't 5g have sub-10ms latency?

(((Unlimited)))

you are australian so probably not

the latency is fine, it's the spotty connection

It will give everyone cancer within a month and humanity will fall

Attached: 1537378965595.png (1296x1458, 217K)

>Australia
who cares

Can anyone give me a quick rundown of why 5G is bad?

5g is thousands of times less radiation than what have been constantly expiriencing since the day you were born.

>5g is harmful

Attached: mmmeme.jpg (639x358, 52K)

Explain

Yet another causality of the whole "lets burn the media credibility to stop trump".

>Not wearing sunscreen in winter here
How do you not instantly burn? Even with a hat on I'll burn after a bit outside from UV reflected off the road and shit.

>$200 a month
OH NO NO NO NO AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
7 usd a month for a month of unlimited data for me

The moment any human in history is born, they are bombarded by the same radiation that 5g is. It's called electromagnetic radiation. Visible light and thermal radiation are the most common, and each individual element of these (photons) are orders of magnitude more powerful than 5g photons. On top of this, there are orders of magnitude more of them bouncing off every surface that you can see.

The only time these cause harm is when you have so many that you can feel it thermally heating your skin (magnifying glass in sunlight, hand in microwave) or its ionizing (uv, xrsy, gamma).

This is the problem with "5G causes cancer" thing. If it DID have an ounce of merit there would already be HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of people dying from brain cancer right now due to ALL of them being exposed to "5G radiation" in levels ways higher than exist right now.

From 2005 to 2012 cellphone ownership went up from 2 BILLION to 5 BILLION. So we SHOULD have seen AT MINIMUM 20,000,000 cases of brain cancer in 2005 and AT MINIMUM 50,000,000 cases of brain cancer in 2012 with over 200,000,000+ deaths worldwide from said brain cancer (especially since cancer treating tech was dogshit back then).

So can you point me to the mass graves of dead people that died directly from "5G cancer"? Remember this is with a relatively high 1% incidence rate among cellphone owners ONLY.

Finally isn't it extremely interesting that brain cancer associated with "5G radiation" is NOT at the top of the list in pic related? Could it be just a huge coincidence that that over 1 BILLION people smoke worldwide and that the majority of cancer is pulmonary?

ourworldindata.org/how-many-people-in-the-world-die-from-cancer

Attached: Screenshot_20190601-112642(1).jpg (720x493, 139K)

I dont go outside often or very long

>$200/month
user i

yikes at that quoting

user your pic doesn't actually work because the scrotum actually contracts the closer you are to cumming.
In comparison they hang lower after ejaculation.

Ty, what about
>Active Denial System uses almost same frequency as 5g, that is coming soon to our homes. The military truck that is equipped with active denial system emits 100 kW of the radio frequency beam. ... Active denial system radiation is similar to microwave oven radiation.Feb 3, 2019

youtube.com/watch?v=FOkh5hxPY6s

It's tuned specifically to cause minor skin burns and lacerations (if improperly used) but again the damage comes from it literally cooking your skin from the inside out NOT from causing cancer.

Anyway this kind of portable energy weapon system won't become popular due to how much electricity it uses how how un-lethal it is. A better alternative would be gamma ray beam emitters that DO emmit ionizing radiation (aka mythical grazer). Such a weapon would not only cause initialy undetectable cancer but would make the target become radioactive and spread the cancer to others (ie terrorist going back in his cave. It has been widely discussed by the military but currently there is no known way to properly create a portable one man operated grazer.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_laser

Attached: michaelbaygifs11.gif (400x300, 1.53M)

5G is not harmful to humans, however it can cause problems for meteorologists who use the same radio bands to study weather patterns

Forgot to mention that pretty much only American meteorologists use those bands, so it will literally have no effect on Australians except giving you faster internet.

>Apparantly 5g is being rolled out in every major australian city
so thats like, 1 city, right?

>same frequency as 5g
>similar to microwave oven radiation
TIL mmWave == microwave

Attached: open_face_club_sandwedge.jpg (800x450, 61K)

>it can cause problems for meteorologists who use the same radio bands to study weather patterns
then it should have been already causing problems for them since mmWave point-to-point links have been ubiquitous for over a decade

Microwaves are also "non ionizing radiation in the milliwatt range".

microwaves oven radiation is in the kW range and the magnetron is 2-3 inches away from the subject being heated you dumb faggot

I don't want to be cooked like a hot dog though.

>bioinitiative.org
literally thousands of studies show that electromagnetic radiation can have harmful health effects. 5G has no use and could be very bad for the public health. its insane that all concerns are being handwaved away to roll out a technology that absolutely nobody needs.

>the water flowing from a small bottle won't hurt you
>oh yeah? What about water from a pressure washer? That can rip flesh off your body!

>damn that tsunami looks dangerous!
>it's just H2O bro it has no calories

This continues being the most disgusting image I know of.

explain x ray then its extremely harmful radiation but you're only exposed to a short second of it but if you were exposed to it more frequently it would cause cancer. just because you cant feel 5G or even the radiation that you're being exposed to atm from wifi radios electronics doesn't mean it's not harmful.

also cancer isn't the only effect this can cause terrible neurological symptoms like constant sleep disruption, brain fog, chronic fatigue, and emotions.

Use an analogy where people are undecisize about safety.

5g is non ionizing so it doesn't cause cancer.

Attached: 2pzj16.jpg (1200x720, 34K)

>this food smells kinda funny, are you sure it's safe to eat?
>yeah bro it's just pork, it's not lava or something lol

>photons can rot

Attached: 1557754993666.jpg (172x435, 9K)

Reminder that the safety of 5G isn't actually proven and anyone claiming otherwise is a dunning kruger liar who just learned what "ionizing" means.

one word: bremsstrahlung

I should say "don't even know what ionizing means but handwaves it as a reason why 5G MUST be perfectly safe".

ya keep believing that as you become a permanent cancer patient being exposed to radiation constantly. people have already measured the radiation and determined it to be way above what safety standards said is safe.

>it's just PHOTONS bro lol!
>oh, blue light is related to eyesight degradation and diseases like cataracts and insomnia?... but black science man said it was perfectly safe...

Dude, some boomers with a chink E field meter aren't measuring anything useful.

Lack of light, not too much, is what leads to visiom problems, retatd.

No choice. You'll have to wear a tinfoil hat 24/7 from now on.

5G will be the asbestos and blue light of the 2020's.
Screenshot this.

Wrong retard.
forbes.com/sites/fionamcmillan/2018/08/11/how-blue-light-damages-cells-in-your-eyes/#2db6f6d9384b

Turns out that constantly blasting extremely sensitive cells with high power energy is not healthy, who could have guessed that?

Wrong. sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/nearsightedness-caused-too-much-time-indoors

Both things are bad for you retard and the new findings about blue light actually reinforces the same theory.

you must be a retard.

Dude, you live on a continent totally covered in some of the deadliest and most aggressive fauna in the world. You're worried about radio waves?

Attached: 1556399382813.jpg (1200x1000, 805K)

>muh blue light
Fuck off, retard.

china is the future

>You're worried about radio waves?
Fear of the unknown.
Also, being hipster enough to be aware of what's the new craze in the US.

this
i don't know why 5g is shilled so hard
to browse fagbook and jewtube, 4g is more than adequate

>australian
so we will see

Solving datacap and overpopulation problem, 2 birds with one stone, the chinks are genius.

i pay $90/month for my 100/30 unlimited fibre plan