Alright fa/g/s, time to do some OPSEC tests. Post your results

Alright fa/g/s, time to do some OPSEC tests. Post your results.

Attached: gogogo.png (671x649, 148K)

Other urls found in this thread:

panopticlick.eff.org/
browserprint.info
browserleaks.com/
youtube.com/watch?v=Hds9tFMuU8o
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

fuck, forgot link
panopticlick.eff.org/

Attached: Screenshot_20190601-144406_Firefox.jpg (1080x2032, 440K)

What do I win?

Attached: 1551467866241.png (663x709, 228K)

same here. Fingerprinting never finishes

Haha these faggots take points off if your browser does not give a shit about do not track bs. Do not track has always been a scam that is just going to get taken advantage of by malicious third parties for tracking.

Same here. Even when I whitelist tracker.org or something

What points lmao

>panopticlick.eff.org/
>Click "Test"
>Page won't even loadbecause IceCat blocks all scripts
What do I win?

>panopticlick
Good to get a first impression of the problem, but for real tests try these
browserprint.info
browserleaks.com/

>Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 209,183 tested in the past 45 days.
oops

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-06-01 at 22.17.23-fullpage.png (1966x3918, 628K)

>tfw same settings as
This actually gives me hope. If more people use the browser fingerprinting + no javascript combo, it will be much harder to identify people.

Attached: 2019-06-01-172641_grim.png (1522x358, 76K)

Really makes you think

Attached: 02-06-2019_44-27-00.png (585x130, 14K)

Yep, whitelisting domains as needed is the way to go. It's very easy if you know what you're doing. Unfortunately, most people don't.

Thanks for these sites, I wasn't aware

If you can run this test without having to enabe javascript and allow tons of shit through your adblockers, then you've already failed.

Attached: 1536648460853.gif (231x274, 38K)

Thank you kind anons, I don't even need to pay anyone for this data

Thank you. I may want to disable javascript more often and whitelist sites like suggested here.
I already do that with umatrix on my laptop.
Yeah, I just disabled javascript to start whitelisting sites with it instead on Bromite, and my fingerprint is unique every single time I run the test at browser browserprint.info now.
>implying there is any useful information at all there.

>data
It's firefox with fingerprinting protection on and javascript disabled. Go have fun with all that "data" friend.

*these

Privacy Possum on Panopticlick

PP obfuscates, but I failed the unblocking and fingerprinting. How should one read into this? I suspect that the developer is correct considering credentials.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-01 cowlicks privacypossum.png (946x536, 40K)

How to spoof another OS using firefox?
When I did a fingerprint test on Icecat before it thought I was using Windows while I was using Debian. Is it a about:config setting?

Set privacy.resistFingerprinting to true. It takes care of the user agent and canvas shit for you.

useless

How do I get a non-unique fingerprint?

privacy.firstparty.isolate;true
privacy.resistFingerprinting;true
browser.display.use_document_fonts;0
webgl.disabled;true
Block all javascript by default and whitelist the least amount of domains as possible with ublock origin and umatrix.

JUST

Attached: IceCat mobile.jpg (1080x2135, 559K)

>mobile
That's your problem

fug

Attached: fug.png (187x80, 2K)

this is meaningless. you won't get any good score without disabling javascript and you'll end up enabling javascript for 90% of websites anyway since they just straight up won't work without it.

Attached: 1535728086621.jpg (615x703, 92K)

But what does it mean.

Attached: yes.png (630x715, 85K)

This is Firefox mobile

Attached: Screenshot_20190602-102211_Firefox.jpg (1080x2032, 643K)

>privacy.firstparty.isolate;true
enjoy breaking half the net for yourself

I've never had a problem. What site(s) didn't work for you?

online payment services

I use amazon and other sites all of the time. Are you sure it's not a different setting that's giving you problems?

enjoy having down syndrome

Fennec with wbgl disabled is pretty safe.

Attached: Screenshot_Fennec_F-Droid_20190602-175548.png (1080x1920, 222K)

impressing counterargument

youtube.com/watch?v=Hds9tFMuU8o

t. your level

How can the results be so different?

Attached: Confused_Gabi.jpg (400x476, 113K)

>mf@ everyone ITT that thinks a fluid unique fingerprint is bad

Attached: 1550389292214.jpg (237x213, 10K)

Use brave

as if im using this site.

>brave
Pic related, it's a test I just did in brave.

Attached: pic-selected-190602-1825-39.png (664x928, 163K)