I'm going to make a language very similar to C but with some design improvements. How should I name it ?

DivineC

Attached: FT_18.04.25_typologyBeliefsGod_feature.jpg (640x320, 182K)

C me fail.

Niggerlicious C

Cunt

Ok guys, what about file type names ?

.cm
.cx
.cdx
.cdl
.cit
.bc
.cenis

.clit

SacredC

.cock

kek, i noticed the photoshopped monitors but the legs took me a while

Cggerlicious.

GNU/C

C^2

inCel

sqrt(E/m)

>
•
But as one character.

C-erebral

rather q/V

Name it Cock

++C
You're making it better (+1) than C before even using it

C (Cyrillic Es letter), just to confuse people

Cute & funny

C scharf

>Cenis
This. And make it so good that everyone will want to use it, so we can all say cenis all the time.

Steelies, or Steely. Wachu know bout that? Probably nothin'...

Attached: 15281.jpg (1000x1000, 253K)

G
check em

Ç

longbjarne is long.

Č

C.ubed

verysimiCdesimPROv

sell it for $99 the pop

it will be hot as summer

hiC

Retard Language

BetterC already exists

++C++

C--

You mean Rust?

I think he meant Go.

YACL

Citadel is already taken though

angled half open circle inverted white shade

Attached: unicode.png (1106x296, 38K)

Interpreted languages can't possibly be considered "C with design improvements".

Oh and don't you dare say Go can be compiled. Embedding the interpreter and the script as one binary isn't compilation, it's simply another way of hiding failure.

Objection C

Attached: d156xet-cc1ce7a0-dd33-41a4-89f8-d7977f608e7a.png (448x313, 20K)

++C

G

What improvements do you have in mind, OP?

SuperC

cwc

It already exist. It's called HolyC

B is a better grade than C

>Embedding the interpreter and the script as one binary
I'm not exactly a fan of Go but what the fuck are you talking about?

++Ͻ

Si-Mas-Mas

4words4u

Cmen

c!
Pronounced 'C bang.'

Introducing a packaging system,
Struct-based method (like Rust but without all the OOP shit)
Fixed length data types.
Renewed syntax (more coincise)
and **maybe** templates.

Attached: benis.png (500x315, 57K)

Someone need to make the logo!!!

unny

D sign

>Struct-based method (like Rust but without all the OOP shit)
Wouldn't struct based methods just end up being OOP shit but more obtuse?

Attached: 1503889730033.png (485x500, 118K)

sipp

C major

only other acceptable choices

name it 'tips fedora'

kek

Kill yourself, degenerate

>like Rust but without all the OOP shit
I think you should first learn what the existing languages are like before you waste your time on doing something nobody ever needed.
>Fixed length data types.
What do you mean by that? Isn't uint16_t fixed length?

Reminder that C++ was supposed to be 'C with classes' before it grew into an abomination.

Nope, frequently is necessary to call function and procedure over struct variable. Pass everytime the variable as parameter is redundant.

It's more an hobby project to master the C programming language and other tools such as flex and bison. I'd like to remove unfixed size primitives like int, long, short, et cetera and introduce only i32, i64, i16 or something like that.

I don't want to introduce OOP shit, but only stuff to make writing low-level stuff more coincise, consistent and especially fun.

I will make the logo

this. fucking THIS

>C

D

If you're not gonna have goto, at least have labeled break
If you're not gonna have real methods, at least have destructors
Bootstrap the compiler in something that targets WASM, and make the compiler target WASM too
Then make a playground that's just a static page with the WASM blobs embedded

Cdeeznuts