Post your valids Jow Forums

valid.x86.fr/gr54l1

valid.x86.fr/0xw6rw

Attached: Selection_001.png (411x416, 34K)

>valid.x86.fr/41n0e9
how much did bdie cost ya

>Screen #2 Spec 27.2 inches (69.1 cm) / 3840 x 2160 pixels @ 56-61 Hz

huh, weird. It thinks my 4k monitor is 27" but it's actually 43".

Odd.

whats more odd is you are running at ddr4-2133

This is my laptop's CPU.

Attached: Capture.png (403x402, 28K)

valid.x86.fr/nruvxb

Anyways, forgot to include my valid link. valid.x86.fr/dscj3g

did a BIOS update a few days ago and it disabled XMP

i'll fix it next time I restart probably in a few weeks.

Not a big deal for me, as you can see i'm running a GTX 1660ti, not like i'm concerned about AAA gaming performance.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-15-19-14-31-747_com.cpuid.cpu_z.png (1080x2160, 218K)

>8192 MB
>Single Channel (64 bit) DDR4-SDRAM
fuck you doing retard?

Single-Channel vs. Dual-Channel only really applies to APUs. Source: I have an AMD A12-9700P APU in my laptop and have 16GB Dual-Channel RAM.

valid.x86.fr/ayi6nl

something is fubar after the microcode update... lost a fuck ton of performance.

last time i buy intel.

Attached: ass.png (402x401, 32K)

memory bandwidth can matter in many circumstances.

For gaming, that's generally true though, most games wont see a difference from single vs dual unless you've got an APU relying on the memory bandwidth for GPU performance.

B-b-but those guys on YouTube said...

Yeah, that's essentially what I'm saying. Here's my valid link, I think I already posted it along with a screenshot in this thread: valid.x86.fr/dscj3g

always believe in yourself no matter what happens in life bud.

7900x was literally the worst HEDT CPU intel ever made.

It was made entirely irrelevant a year later by the 9900k which could get 8 cores and 16 threads to 5ghz on a much cheaper consumer platform.

I don't know what this advice has to do with any of this? No offence.

valid.x86.fr/xtcep9

Attached: xtcep9.png (403x402, 34K)

>something is fubar after the microcode update... lost a fuck ton of performance.
oh nononono

Im running off spare ram because my 16gbs dont POST at all.

>hynix m-die 2400 ram upped to 2933 with tightened timings
how's your voltage user?
>1.76v

Attached: 1499487036615.jpg (208x200, 13K)

So far stable at 16-17-17-17-38 on 1.21v. Not sure if i should try to push it further or wait few days to check on stability.

>t.buttblasted voltlet

what the actual FUCK

you are confusing the 7900x with the rebranded 9900x

7900x was a early 2017 cpu, for its time only a well binned 7700k could push the main core farther, and at that point the 7900x it had 6 extra cores over it so it would crush it on HEDT workloads, which is what i do most of the time. (Multiboxing)

by the time it was relaunched as the 9900x, yeah it was crap on price/performance compared to a 9900k (having o get much more expensive MOBO is the real deal breaker), not to mention when compared to a 2700x

and once you factor in the performance losses due to security flaw patches, AMD looks like it owns the HEDT space.

im not a fanboy, i go with the best performance at the time i make my purchase and as far as i can see, only a miracle can save intel after the zen2 comes around.

>early 2017 cpu
June doesnt = "early"

> 1.591 Volts

Attached: 1453081431608.jpg (410x416, 87K)

Attached: 132231.png (400x399, 23K)

at the time it was competing with the 1700x/1800x from AMD and the 8xxx cpus wouldn't be launched till much later that year. (not that they were any good)

so yeah it was on the first batch of releases intel made that year, and the moment it was launched it was the best money could buy.

and by best i mean an HEDT platform that could do single core tasks matching mainstream desktop cpus, while still delivering massive multicore performance. so that leaves out the14+ core meme CPUs from intel launched at the same time and the embarrassment that the first Thread-ripper was.

the purchase decision was fine at the time considering money is not really an issue for me, and if you poor ass is so adamant about bitching about something, then bitch about the ram being dual channel and 16gb per module, now there you would have a valid point... that was a a brain fart.

Hello fellows.

Attached: R52600.png (805x401, 43K)

SGI Octane 2

IRIS 1% hinv
2 600 MHZ IP30 Processors
CPU: MIPS R14000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.4
FPU: MIPS R14010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 0.0
Main memory size: 4096 Mbytes
Xbow ASIC: Revision: 1.4
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 2 Mbytes
Integral SCSI controller 0: Version QL1040B (rev. 2), single ended
Disk drive: unit 1 on SCSI controller 0
Disk drive: unit 2 on SCSI controller 0
Disk drive: unit 3 on SCSI controller 0
Integral SCSI controller 1: Version QL1040B (rev. 2), single ended
Integral SCSI controller 3: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Integral SCSI controller 4: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Integral SCSI controller 6: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Integral SCSI controller 10: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty1
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty2
IOC3 parallel port: plp1
Graphics board: V12
Integral Fast Ethernet: ef0 version 1, pci 2
Gigabit Ethernet: tg3, PCI slot 3
Iris Audio Processor: version RAD revision 12.0, number 1
IRIS 2%

>5.8GHZ
>1.76V
>2700X
how can one user be so based?

oldie but goldie
valid.x86.fr/2yqwuk

Attached: file.png (401x401, 48K)

>tomahawk
based