Is there any software that is NOT malicious in some way?

Is there any software that is NOT malicious in some way?

Attached: 09DA7447-8472-4564-9E6C-AF941354A6DA.jpg (1125x1385, 106K)

Other urls found in this thread:

grc.com/misc/truecrypt/truecrypt.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

not really, assume everything is malicious unless the code is audited.

Attached: tools.jpg (190x191, 6K)

Libre software is not malicious in any way.

show me FOSS that's externally and independently audited. i'll wait.

TempleOS

This is a very naïve statement

OpenBSD

the software that you write yourself.
unless you make it malicious, that is. trust no one, if a guy from /dpt/ can write an os then so can you.

If you want the software audited so bad, why not just do it yourself? That’s the entire point of libre software. So that you can look at it your fucking self. There is not one big mommy-like entity who’s gonna audit the source code ans tell you if it’s safe or not. Fucking retard.

>it's open-source so do it yourself
fuck off.

This is true

cat

That’s the entire point, though. If you’ve ever listened to Stallman’s rants, he always says that users should be examining source code themselves. If you don’t want to do it, no one’s going to do it for you, tardo.

how is this whore doing nowadays anyway

best thing you can do is use commercial software, companies would then have a heck of a lot more to lose if they are caught doing something fishy than a dev group on github

>baww doing work is hard
i bet you are the type who refuses to pay for any software and then complains when you get a virus from torrented photoshop

Don't call her that. :(

Attached: an07xd1dm1z21.jpg (640x844, 79K)

Would "slut" be preferable? Maybe "thot"?

Attached: qgxi6RJHSKgBkHUcYHcrnn[1].jpg (1121x663, 158K)

>ball travels right down the middle

Attached: 1552841232150.jpg (550x549, 35K)

Well what's your definition of 'malicious'?

Pong

This software is a virus that consumes all your time.

TempleOS

The programs (You) wrote and audited

/thread.

I write viruses. What now?

My Arch install has never betrayed me.

TAD approves this message

Try auditing systemd retard.
It's a lot of code for just one individual.

Serenity

no coc, no botnet, just pure autism

God tested, God approved.
>programming in heaven

Attached: 1544038666980.gif (300x424, 2.56M)

TrueCrypt 7.1a
grc.com/misc/truecrypt/truecrypt.htm

is this the new hit or miss

fpbp. This is undeniably the best response to the entire thread. The code is either audited by the community or it isn't. Feel vulnerable? Audit the code yourself. Does this mean you need to audit everything yourself? No.

Information comes out all the time concerning security vulnerabilities and cracks occurring throughout "trusted" companies. I have yet to hear a compelling argument pro-side this.

>Well what's your definition of 'malicious'?
Characterized by malice; intending or intended to do harm.
This includes: privacy, security, job security, personality/character sniping, etc...

Spotify

autism

retard

This picture looks way too fucking much like my ex and it's been driving me crazy all evening as I scroll through the catalog.