Literal wizardry

did you watch the video in the OP? they used even multiple sources and angles.

What language did they use for this? I bet on Python with C++

And how would you convince russians, chinese, and indians (and dumb westerners) that the fake videos of a politician going apeshit are indeed fake?
It's still being debated whether Khruschev hit the table with his shoe in an outrage. There is no need for this shitty technology to ruin the only way to verifiably send information across the globe.

So you think video can't be doctored right now?

Not by every angsty loner shitposter on the planet.

your retardation is showing.

you have never seen deepfake porn videos?

You can officially not trust anything on youtube again.

reproduce

I have, they look like shit and I'm glad they disappeared.

I never did.

Dilate

>I'm glad they disappeared.
>they disappeared
are you retarded? they became better and now have entire porn sites dedicated to them

>porn sites
With what, 5 angsty loner visitors a month? Good riddance.

It looks too good to be true. And you know what they say, "if it looks too good to be true..."

COPE more faggot, but web traffic is easily looked up if you're not a retard

What prevents your enemy from taking your signature and adding it to their fake video of you saying you like to eat shit?

I'm not obsessed with porn, especially not fake porn. It was mostly tolerable when a bunch of incels used this tech recreationally, but now it has worldwide implications.
Get fucked. Literally.

>I'm not obsessed with porn
neither am I, I'm just not delusional about video editing like you are.

Asymmetric cryptography?
This is nothing new.

There is nothing to be delusional about. This should be banned immediately.

>Get fucked. Literally.

Attached: 1553064904773.png (648x636, 240K)

>This should be banned immediately.
>Because banning things actually makes them stop happening

Attached: 1546435506526.png (782x758, 143K)

Sure some "usage of AI" is equal to child soldiers, chemical/biological warfare, etc. Brainlet.

It's almost as bad in the sense that now we have the tech to create, for instance, personally targeted CGI content for radical islam or see-once fake news. That, as well as inconsequential defamation and slander. There is no law to protect against such fabrications anywhere. This tech's sole purpose is to act against the peace of society.
What are people going to do, start mass spamming fake videos and then get shut down by their ISPs?

*prevents binural audio from being a thing in games for 20 years* (patent is still active)

Attached: Aureal_A3D_(logo).png (212x300, 24K)

Internet journalism was already in a bad place, before this happened. Unless journalists find a good way to prove that their vids were not altered, we are looking at the end of journalism.

>tfw humanity will be forced to go back to doing EVERYTHING in person because all video and audio can be faked in real time

Thank Creative for destroying them.

you have to be really low-iq to post something like that

>muuh porno
>noooo dont ban my porno!

Finally, something good happened.

So we can all agree that the entire field of journalism is dead for good now, right? And so are things like conference calls, phone calls, etc. for transmitting sensitive information. We'll be forced to see and hear things in person or it will be written off as completely made up.

So what are some GOOD uses we can gain from this technology?

Pretty much this.

Just make an AI that detects deepfakes if you're so scared.

How utterly convenient that the streets are filled with cameras and microphones.

NICE :D

Attached: hqdefault (2).jpg (480x360, 41K)

all video games can have gigantic storylines all fully voiced with realistic video of the people talking without having a huge budget

Awareness of this

An actual believable voice changer. (Current voice changers morphvox/diamond/clownfish were last updated in 2010 and sound fake)

making voices =/= voice acting
Sure, you can have lame ass indie games

How is that good?

>making voices =/= voice acting
what do you think is voice acting?

All surveillance has become useless too. Anybody can modify it, so why bother with it?

there's already a video of some deep learning thing changing the tone of voice and making someone sound excited, sad or angry.

Did fake stories kill text-based journalism? No. Death of journalism is when people start believing everything without checking sources.

Free Steam games from beta males.

Attached: 1549657908906.jpg (880x720, 68K)

People in poor health can digitally do the things they used to be able to do in person.

Conveying an appropriate emotion through voice given context. Making voices anyone can do for cartoon shows.
Except the authorities have men working round the clock to verify the feeds.
I've heard it and it didn't sound convincing at all.

>I've heard it and it didn't sound convincing at all.
>he thinks he knows of the current progress
>he thinks it will never get better
>he thinks it's not already better than the average video game voice acting
kys

>Except the authorities have men working round the clock to verify the feeds.
Hahahaha. Nice meme. There are thousands (if not millions) of cameras out there. You think somebody verifies their live streaming 24 hours a day?
Cameras have become obsolete. There will be a new generation of camera hackers that will do just what OP's vid showed.

Anyone can go on a mic and sound "happy" or "sad". Not anyone can actually convey an emotion and play with his intonation. It's deeper than some fag's trial and error algorithms.
It's not as hard as you think or do you actually imagine the police raging about because some 12 year old hacked their cameras? Hacktivism is fucking dead, nowadays it's too easy for law enforcement to ruin you and nobody in this or the next generation will have the balls to stand up and take a hit.

>Anyone can go on a mic and sound "happy" or "sad". Not anyone can actually convey an emotion and play with his intonation. It's deeper than some fag's trial and error algorithms.
you clearly have not played enough games if you think the average video game voice acting is good.

First of all, publicly displayed technology is 100x worse than whatever the US and Chinese governments have for personal usage. Based on the information on the OP, we can safely assume that state actors can convincingly fake real time video.
>Except the authorities have men working round the clock to verify the feeds.
All of them? All the intelligence agents in the world would be unable to real time monitor every camera in NYC alone. And besides, in the future, people could potentially bug all the relevant cameras and fake the footage in real time for this very purpose. Nobody would ever know that it was fake.

I think you're missing the bigger picture. Videos and audio used to be proof that backed up the text. Now everyone can distribute fake proof that backs up their fake story. When there's multiple contradictory stories that all have convincing evidence to back them up, you have no way of knowing who is lying and who is not.

>Did fake stories kill text-based journalism?
OP's vid doesn't kill text-based journalism. It kills online journalism. Paper based journalism will be revived by this because you can't alter a paper's contents.

That's true, I mostly play games like god of war and uncharted. I'll give it to you, Metro does sound like dumb robots voiced it.

>could potentially bug all the relevant cameras
And then get found out and get fucked.

>Videos and audio used to be proof that backed up the text.
Just as photos used to back up text but people learned to take them with a grain of salt when image editing became easy.

>So we can all agree that the entire field of journalism is dead for good now, right? And so are things like conference calls, phone calls, etc. for transmitting sensitive information. We'll be forced to see and hear things in person or it will be written off as completely made up.
no nigger, mainstream use of cryptography and PGP will finally reach mass adoption

>tfw journalists will post checksums with every article or video they post

Useless. The checksum is to see if you downloaded the content correctly. What about a checksum of the checksum?

idk about checksums but I was thinking more along the lines of people actually maintaining their own private/public keys and signing their statements with them. Pretty hard to fake that and can be made user friendly with qr codes.

If a video is tampered, the checksum will not match the one posted. So checksumming with a strong algo like SHA256 is one way to go.
>you'll have to download the full video before seeing it tho

>OP's vid doesn't kill text-based journalism.
I'm not saying that. I say that you could fake stories since the dawn of time and journalism didn't cease to exist. Then you could fake photos and people learned not to brain-deadly trust what they see. Now that techniques exist to fake videos, the public will start to question the authenticity of videos and not take them for "truth". This is a good thing IMHO.

Good post.

>mainstream use of cryptography and PGP will finally reach mass adoption
lol

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signature

If it doesn't happen, analog media (like radio and newspapers) will get more attention because they are by default more reliable.

i mean mainstream use of crypto aside from TLS

i think, in the future, videos from politicians will absolutely be "signed" with somebody's private key stored with their twitter account or something like that.

>i love the smell of __________ in the morning
fix it Jow Forums

Attached: apu.gif (116x116, 54K)

clean streets you twat

Attached: 2019-06-17_175109.png (327x325, 172K)

How do I guarantee the .html Im looking at is the html the server hosted?

Same way you do right now, TLS?

https is everywhere these days.

You're right, we might even be inside the matrix right now and even talking to people face-to-face is subject to editing and falsification.

>from now on all twitter/fb posts are automatically signed with your unique private key that is kept safely in twitter's/fb's servers
Users of social media deserve this.

>analog media (like radio and newspapers) will get more attention because they are by default more reliable
What plan do you think they will come up with to become reliable in the first place?

>i think, in the future, videos from politicians will absolutely be "signed" with somebody's private key stored with their twitter account or something like that.
But a signed video wouldn't be anymore true that a signed text. Cryptography doesn't solve that problem.

DNSSEC and HTTPS.

and certificates have proven to not be trustworthy. have you never heard the news stories of them fucking up?

Now you understand why a secure web server on a secure OS is useful.

Attached: openbsd.png (1400x1270, 384K)

>Did you hear about the crook that stole a calendar, no I did not.

Reliable because their contents can't be tampered.

>Reliable because their contents can't be tampered
This isn't the problem with OP's video editing technique. If the authentic video is released publicly who would bother to tamper with it ?

*yawn*
They should have made her say "I'm a fucking slut" or something
Changing up some numbers is boring and unimpressive

But wouldn't they have to start printing the truth instead then? Altering the content isn't a problem for the most part.
I would assume the US has been able to do this video editing live for years.

Depends on how the signature functions. If it functions in some way as to "embed" itself in a video such that you could hold up your phone to it or run the video through a command line program and check if the video is authentic or that the owner of that signature has verified the video's authenticity. If the video has been fucked with by DL, the embedded portion breaks. Or at least, that's the ideal.

Kind of like a cross between a cryptographic version of "I'm Donald Trump and I approve of this message" and watermarking.

Saved as Cortana image

>posts video on youtube
>everybody sees it
>decides to modify it afterwards
>who can prove that it wasn't like that in the first place?