Oh no no no
Oh no no no
Other urls found in this thread:
>laptop
>Cherry picked sample
>those base clock boost clock speed differences
>2 core i7
What in the goddamn
amd is for poor people and third worlders. deal with it
intel:
>1.3ghz base
>3.9ghz boost
pooramd
>2.1ghz base
>3.7ghz boost
if anything amd has a slight advantage with a 800mhz advantage with the base clock. while intel only has a 200mhz advantage with turbo.
Why would base clock matter in benchmark?
>pissmark
>comparing 10nm pile of dogshit to zen+ and not zen 2
Truly, AMD is finished
>this is ignoring that Mobile Ryzen is just Zen+
Wow, it's fucking nothing.
How long for an actual test? Something that isn't about boost clock
it helps for higher sustained frequencies. intel can throttle all the way down to 1.3ghz do to heat, power consumption, extra. while amd will only throttle down to 2.1ghz in such cases. making single threaded performance come into play heavier in the equation. just like turbo isn't sustained as well.
>200mhz advantage with turbo
>~5% difference in clockspeed
>~20% difference in performance (10,000 vs 8,000)
>200mhz advantage with turbo
>~5% difference in clockspeed
>~30-40% difference in single core performance (2625 vs 1818)
Yeah, no matter how you spin it, AMD aint lookin great here.
Thats not how throttling works. If a CPU reaches temp of 90c @ 3.9 Ghz, it won't throttle down to 1.3 Ghz @ 50c, it will throttle down to 3.5 ghz @ 80c. The sustains on Intel won't be 1.3 ghz, it will be close to 3.9 Ghz as possible, probably 3.7 or 3.6 ghz in long 24 hour benchmark stress tests.
Turbo is sustained as long as there is enough cooling.
Just depends on the laptop design at what point it'll start to turbo down. With good enough cooling, it could sustain 3.9Ghz 24/7.
>n=1
Do we even know what system was used to produce these pukemark results?
Was the 10th gen system used here even available to purchase?
hyberthrading :DDD
It's a quad core with hyper threading
It says 4 physical cores, 2 logical cores per physical core.
So 4 core, 8 threads.
Just like the 3500U is 4 core, 8 threads.
>TDP
>Yearly running cost
what are the chances the Intel chip goes to 15w only when idling?
Intel mobile chips generally had better idle last gen. Not sure about this one but it will likely continue seeing as AMD is still on Zen+
>laptop
>Turbo is sustained as long as there is enough cooling.
you don't say. i feel like someone else already said that. oh, wait, i did.
>intel can throttle all the way down to 1.3ghz do to heat, power consumption, extra
>heat
>power consumption
>extra
>just like turbo isn't sustained as well.
>Thats not how throttling works. If a CPU reaches temp of 90c @ 3.9 Ghz, it won't throttle down to 1.3 Ghz @ 50c, it will throttle down to 3.5 ghz @ 80c. The sustains on Intel won't be 1.3 ghz, it will be close to 3.9 Ghz as possible, probably 3.7 or 3.6 ghz in long 24 hour benchmark stress tests.
>it won't throttle down to 1.3 Ghz @ 50c, it will throttle down to 3.5 ghz @ 80c.
i see you fail at reading comprehension. lets see what I wrote shall we?
>intel can throttle all the way down to 1.3ghz do to heat, power consumption, extra.
>intel can throttle all the way down to 1.3ghz
>can all the way down to 1.3ghz
>can
>can
>can
>can
no where did i say it will. but can. having a higher base clock helps ensure higher clocks during throttling. intel imposing a 1.3ghz base means they are focusing on very low wattage usage. especially at idle usage. along with allowing for thinning laptop designs that impose weak cooling since it can drop all the way down to 1.3ghz if it needs to and not violate spec.
>needs
>needs
>needs
>needs
Dumb retard. The question is how does it help with benchmark. 1.3 ghz base is not a realistic benchmark number.
COPE
my laptop does 10k points in same test, how is this impressive in any way?
So if I follow your logic, I went from being a rich dude and living in a first country to a pajeet third worlder by upgrading my 7700k to a 1950x?
>mobile chip
>won't see desktop chips until 2021
By the time 10nm hits the desktop, AMD will have dropped to 5nm.
>vulnerabilty mitigations off
what benchmark suite is this?
where can I find the 4700QM results?
How long does the benchmark run?
It's passmark performancetest, you can compare results for other cpus here.
cpubenchmark.net
I don't remember I ran that benchmark a long time ago.
3500u roughly on par with 8250u
>Mobile shit
Who cares about laptop/console niggers?